ADVERTISEMENT

Most incompetent VP in history

🤣You know it’s the truth…cmon man don’t be 100 percent obtuse. 99 percent is at least understandable if not forgivable lol
Whatever you say recruiting analyst/psychologist/poker pro/cheese biscuit baker.

I think any reasonable adult is not voting based on winning any pathetic argument, regardless of how you see it as "truth". However, someone suggesting the above scenario is just insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okcpokefan12
Progressives are every bit the idiots the world thinks they are. Mollie Hemingway explains it in detail in Rigged using small words.

As the overwhelming majority here well knows, I have a series of questions designed to measure the ability to reason that proves it.

The question most answered correctly by pure accident? But never by a progressive.

driad and launch were born April 26, 1982 at 5:10 AM and 46 seconds. Which one is older?

And yes, Dave. On my 60 question, 60 minute time limit M test I was lucky enough to provide the correct answer. No doubt you can also.

Sorry, Dave. There's not 81 million of you in a population of 331 million with an average IQ of 98 to vote for a stiff who can't draw 5 cars to a Jack in the Box drive thru. Anyone who's slept through a course in classical mechanics knows it.
 
who picked up more votes among Democrats in the one contest that they were both part of, Harris or Gabbard?
And again, where is Gabbard and where is Harris right now?

The question all you right-wingers keep ignoring.🤣
 
And again, where is Gabbard and where is Harris right now?

The question all you right-wingers keep ignoring.🤣
Gabbard is enjoying life in Hawaii, surfing the waves and relaxing on the beaches. At least when she’s not being sent to missions overseas because of her Army commitment.

Harris is daily making a fool of herself on an international stage.

I’d give the “win” to Gabbard!
 
And fell from a “top tier” candidate (as she bragged immediately after the debate) to a nonentity almost overnight.
And yet Harris is Vice President right now and Gabbard couldn't even get re-elected to Congress. Yet, Gabbard delivered a knock out blow? 🤣🤣

You sure do love your delusions Dan.

First, only a couple of weeks before her precipitous drop in the polls he was insisting she was a brilliant human being that he endorsed (although he now says he was for Bernie all along),
I was always for Bernie. Harris was my second choice.

And Vice President Harris is a very smart lady. For example, I guarantee she knows what democratic socialism is, unlike you who had no clue what it was!🤣

Secondly, accusing Biden of being a racist in bed with segregationists seems a very risky move if she was really aiming for VP from the beginning.
She never claimed Biden was a racist. She just challenged his previous willingness to align with segregationists. And she was right. By doing this, she showed Biden how tough she can be, when needed.

And what is she now Dan? She is Vice President! Biden put her on the ticket.

Clearly she knew what she was doing. Unlike Gabbard, whose political career is over.
 
Gabbard is enjoying life in Hawaii, surfing the waves and relaxing on the beaches. At least when she’s not being sent to missions overseas because of her Army commitment.

Harris is daily making a fool of herself on an international stage.

I’d give the “win” to Gabbard!
🤣🤣

Gabbard is out of politics (literally couldn't get re-elected to Congress) and Harris is Vice President. Yet, you give the win to Gabbard?🤣🤣

Just admit the truth Dan for once. Gabbard destroyed her political career. You probably knew she would, that is why you feign support for her. She isn't a serious political threat to your right-wing ideology, unlike Harris.
 
Last edited:
Harris was not picked because of her political prowess and you know it. Biden played that race card immediately, lol.
I disagree. Harris was picked for numerous reasons. She positioned herself perfectly for the VP spot.

Gabbard, meanwhile, positioned herself for political irrelevancy. And that is exactly what she got.
 
If you even want that scenario to happen just to "win" an argument, you're a phuckin idiot.
I don't want Harris to become President just to win an argument. But when she does become President, there is no doubt Dan will have an epic meltdown. And the sexists/racists will also have a meltdown.
 
I don't want Harris to become President just to win an argument. But when she does become President, there is no doubt Dan will have an epic meltdown. And the sexists/racists will also have a meltdown.
I have nothing against her race or sex...I just think she's a bad politician. I don't think she set herself up more so than the party playing a certain set of cards.
 
I have nothing against her race or sex...I just think she's a bad politician. I don't think she set herself up more so than the party playing a certain set of cards.
A bad politician who has gone from being a local district attorney to being Vice President?🙄

And I don't disagree that the party played a certain set of cards, as they always do when choosing nominees. Harris was smart enough though to position herself to benefit from the cards that would be played. That is what a good politician does. Think, for example, of Harry Truman. Go back and read how he perfectly positioned himself for the VP nomination in '44.

Bad politicians, on the other hand, make
moves that render them irrelevant. Moves that gets them essentially ran out of politics. And that is exactly what Gabbard did.
 
I disagree. Harris was picked for numerous reasons. She positioned herself perfectly for the VP spot.

Gabbard, meanwhile, positioned herself for political irrelevancy. And that is exactly what she got.


I try really hard not to make fun of some of your comments, but sometimes it just can’t be ignored. Think what you want about Tulsi Gabbard, neither she nor I particularly care. But your notion that Harris “positioned herself perfectly for the VP slot” by making a complete ass out of herself in her reaction to Tulsi’s broadside is just too funny to pass up. Harris was chosen by Biden’s handlers for one reason only, and the fact she’s dumber than a nail has proven to be yet another miscalculation by the people running the show.
 
Think what you want about Tulsi Gabbard, neither she nor I particularly care.
Actually no one cares about Gabbard. She is irrelevant in politics now. She literally destroyed her political career.

Meanwhile, Harris is your Vice President. And she will continue to be very relevant in politics moving forward.

Maybe one day you will decide to actually listen to me instead of believing the absurd nonsense you choose to believe on a daily basis.
 
Actually no one cares about Gabbard. She is irrelevant in politics now. She literally destroyed her political career.

Meanwhile, Harris is your Vice President. And she will continue to be very relevant in politics moving forward.

Maybe one day you will decide to actually listen to me instead of believing the absurd nonsense you choose to believe on a daily basis.
Oh, I do listen to you. And I take you seriously most of the time, even though I usually disagree with your opinion. But sometimes your remarks come so absurdly from left field it makes me
laugh out loud. What makes it so funny is I think you really believe what you said is true.

Tulsi Gabbard should not be considered as a professional politician. She made it clear that flying home to her district in Hawaii from DC almost every weekend was wearing thin on her. She made it clear that she was a “citizen” politician representing her district out of care for her country, not lust for power. There’s no doubt Hillary was looking under every rock to find someone to primary her, but Tulsi has shown she is not one to back away from a fight (especially if the opponent is Hillary Clinton). Just because you think she could not be reelected does not make it so. Unlike Kamala Harris Tulsi does not have an insatiable lust for political prominence. But I get it: you are incapable of understanding that.
 
but Tulsi has shown she is not one to back away from a fight
But that is exactly what she did. She knew she wasn't going to be able to be re-elected to Congress and that is why she backed away from the fight and didn't run for re-election.

btw, Gabbard made a lot of enemies in Hawaii. I know in your conspiratorial world, the Clintons are to blame for everything. But Gabbard tanked her own political career. She has no one to blame but herself.

Unlike Kamala Harris Tulsi does not have an insatiable lust for political prominence.
🤣🤣

Sure Gabbard has a lust for political prominence. She ran for President after all.

She is just a lousy politician. She is an opportunist and a fake, and most people have seen that about her. And again, I think deep down you even know this. That is why you feign support for her. You know she isn't a real political threat to your right-wing ideology.
 
Oh, I do listen to you. And I take you seriously most of the time, even though I usually disagree with your opinion. But sometimes your remarks come so absurdly from left field it makes me
laugh out loud. What makes it so funny is I think you really believe what you said is true.

Tulsi Gabbard should not be considered as a professional politician. She made it clear that flying home to her district in Hawaii from DC almost every weekend was wearing thin on her. She made it clear that she was a “citizen” politician representing her district out of care for her country, not lust for power. There’s no doubt Hillary was looking under every rock to find someone to primary her, but Tulsi has shown she is not one to back away from a fight (especially if the opponent is Hillary Clinton). Just because you think she could not be reelected does not make it so. Unlike Kamala Harris Tulsi does not have an insatiable lust for political prominence. But I get it: you are incapable of understanding that.
Tulsi has been in some political employment for half her life lol, in office, working for the DNC, for Bernie Sanders, etc. Trying to paint her as a political outsider is silly at best Dan.

And she absolutely has a lust for political prominence…..so much so that she may get into some trouble for recently making political statements on social media while in uniform.


Your creepy old man attraction to her is empty and feckless.
 
Andrew Johnson!!

who said:

"This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government for white men,"
 
Tulsi has been in some political employment for half her life lol, in office, working for the DNC, for Bernie Sanders, etc. Trying to paint her as a political outsider is silly at best Dan.

And she absolutely has a lust for political prominence…..so much so that she may get into some trouble for recently making political statements on social media while in uniform.


Your creepy old man attraction to her is empty and feckless.
Well, she sure isn't a political insider!
 
Progressives are every bit the idiots the world thinks they are. Mollie Hemingway explains it in detail in Rigged using small words.

As the overwhelming majority here well knows, I have a series of questions designed to measure the ability to reason that proves it.

The question most answered correctly by pure accident? But never by a progressive.

driad and launch were born April 26, 1982 at 5:10 AM and 46 seconds. Which one is older?

And yes, Dave. On my 60 question, 60 minute time limit M test I was lucky enough to provide the correct answer. No doubt you can also.

Sorry, Dave. There's not 81 million of you in a population of 331 million with an average IQ of 98 to vote for a stiff who can't draw 5 cars to a Jack in the Box drive thru. Anyone who's slept through a course in classical mechanics knows it.
I'll answer for you, DCandtheUTBand. The correct answer is, I don't know.

If I know launch and driad's place of birth, then I know which is older or if both are the same age. Time zones or zone.

I happen to know DC can answer the question. I happen to know the board's slow haven't a clue.
 
You just can't trust a person with a double phallic name like Dick Johnson.

It's worse than Peter O'Toole.
 
Oh, I do listen to you. And I take you seriously most of the time, even though I usually disagree with your opinion. But sometimes your remarks come so absurdly from left field it makes me
laugh out loud. What makes it so funny is I think you really believe what you said is true.

Tulsi Gabbard should not be considered as a professional politician. She made it clear that flying home to her district in Hawaii from DC almost every weekend was wearing thin on her. She made it clear that she was a “citizen” politician representing her district out of care for her country, not lust for power. There’s no doubt Hillary was looking under every rock to find someone to primary her, but Tulsi has shown she is not one to back away from a fight (especially if the opponent is Hillary Clinton). Just because you think she could not be reelected does not make it so. Unlike Kamala Harris Tulsi does not have an insatiable lust for political prominence. But I get it: you are incapable of understanding that.
First they had Cankles...

Now they have Cackles...

Why does the left gravitate toward the people with the least personality, talent, and intelligence? It's a loser mentality. They hit a gold streak with Obama and since we've had... HilLIARy and Pedo Joe. And they're acting as if something miraculous has happened. It's the weirdest political cult shit I've ever seen.
 
And again, where is Gabbard and where is Harris right now?

The question all you right-wingers keep ignoring.🤣
Nobody voted for Harris. Some voted for Biden, many voted against Trump

Biden could have won jus as easily with Tulsi as his running mate. Nobody voted for Harris.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT