attempts to smear Ted Cruz.
https://www.conservativereview.com/...mpaigns-unseemly-alinsky-tactics-against-cruz
https://www.conservativereview.com/...mpaigns-unseemly-alinsky-tactics-against-cruz
Mark Levin on Maro Rubio Campaign's...
- Thread starter Marshal Jim Duncan
- Start date
Rubio sucks....he's the best GOP candidate in front of the camera IMO but his policies are garbage.
Here's an interesting article talking about what Rubio's actually done to dismantle Obamacare as opposed to just talking about it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/10/us/politics/marco-rubio-obamacare-affordable-care-act.html?_r=0
I've read that his position and voting record is quite similar to Cruz, with the exception of immigration. I've been too lazy thus far to compare, though. When it's down to just those two, I'll look closer . . .
I haven't figured out why some are so totally against Rubio. I like him. There is no such thing as an electable perfect candidate that will agree with you on every position. Pick the most important issues and see where it lines up.
He gets beat up on immigration, but his stance is not blanket amnesty. His stance is actually something workable. Not ideal, but the ideal solution just isn't workable.
He gets beat up on immigration, but his stance is not blanket amnesty. His stance is actually something workable. Not ideal, but the ideal solution just isn't workable.
Who really knows what Rubio's stance on immigration is? The fact that he walked directly into the Gang of 8 situation suggests he is either an opportunist who was too naive/gullible to understand how/why Charles Schumer invited him in or that he is a dissembler as to what his true intentions were on the issue. The truth probably includes a little of both.
If his preferred policy is fine why does he constantly float false charges about other Senators, including Cruz, Jeff Sessions, et al?.
If his preferred policy is fine why does he constantly float false charges about other Senators, including Cruz, Jeff Sessions, et al?.
Well let's see, he's all about big national government and disregarding the 10th amendment, he's a war hawk in the same mold and Lindsey Graham and John McCain, he supported the nomination and voted to confirm John Kerry, he has been absent for several key debates and discussion, he supports the NDAA, he supported a permanent extension of the Patriot Act, he believes the war on drugs has been a success, he's argued against due process.
Is there any point in going on. It is pretty safe to say he's not an advocate of liberty. He's a conservative in name only neo-con.
Is there any point in going on. It is pretty safe to say he's not an advocate of liberty. He's a conservative in name only neo-con.
Yeah, and he's ripped Cruz for not supporting the NDAA. Cruz voted against Kerry BTW.
