ADVERTISEMENT

Let's peel this onion while we're at it.

You've won! #MAGA forever!
shyster, I don't consider it a win. It's way too easy to point out that you're exactly the caricature that you make Biff Sniffers out to be. Kinda sad really. You kick yourself in the nuts with my foot.
 
I think you're using 'again' very loosely.

Conversing with you is like decoding shit on the back of a cereal box.

shyster, I don't consider it a win. It's way too easy to point out that you're exactly the caricature that you make Biff Sniffers out to be. Kinda sad really. You kick yourself in the nuts with my foot.

Oh, but it is a win. It's a testament to the sheer volume and repetition of your posts. Don't stop though.

I hear Hillary bitch cankles bitch twat has some stretch marks. I love women though. How am I doing? If I don't get laid this weekend can I be a proudboi?
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Conversing with you is like decoding shit on the back of a cereal box.



Oh, but it is a win. It's a testament to the sheer volume and repetition of your posts. Don't stop though.

I hear Hillary bitch cankles bitch twat has some stretch marks. I love women though. How am I doing? If I don't get laid this weekend can I be a proudboi?
I don't know anything about the proudboi thing. Sorry bro. But the good news for you is that you can probably be just about anything you want but honest.
 
Conversing with you is like decoding shit on the back of a cereal box.



Oh, but it is a win. It's a testament to the sheer volume and repetition of your posts. Don't stop though.

I hear Hillary bitch cankles bitch twat has some stretch marks. I love women though. How am I doing? If I don't get laid this weekend can I be a proudboi?

psst FLHOTUS author, you have no credibility.
 
Nope, sorry. This has been cancelled out by your own doing. Calling Melania a whore, transsexuals "trannies," and claiming better dick is the cure for radical feminism and then acting like you have some high road isn't going to cut it. Sorry shyster.

You still don't get it. You rip women for being women ("bitch" "cankles") and when I criticize them it's for their voluntary conduct. Except for Sarah Sanders but I've been pretty reserved, even with her. "Tranny" is bad? Don't they call themselves "Transexuals?" Now I can't even say Tranny here among frenemies? I didn't say "dick" was the cure -- I said your inability to have some minimum sexual competence is one of the root causes of your misogyny. The argument is reduced to "dick" by you - there you go, example #567. It's reduced to "dick." A woman would likely find more sexual and mental pleasure with a retarded, mute, eunich than she would with you and you're bitter. I know these things.

Oh no -- it's too late. And she can't be prosecuted now because of an AIG investigation. In case you didn't know, there's apparently a law that the DOJ doesn't prosecute crimes unless first there's an AIG investigation. Or something like that. We have to have entirely new investigations because the conclusions she committed these crimes and killings and coverups don't count any more because the FBI has moles. At least, I think that's how it goes -- I'm new to this MAGA stuff. But all those crimes she committed weren't crimes now, I don't think.

Help?

Rog and Nurse Ratchet, can you help me get this right? What exactly is the reason why nobody in Biff's administration is enforcing the law and charging Canklesbitchseizure bleeding stretchmarks Hillary? (I love women, btw. This is just how we guys that love women describe them if we disagree with them politically.)

I know how much you and @CSCOTTOSUPOKES care about tax returns, do you might tap the brakes on this billboard lawyer guy.


I'm not endorsing his candidacy for anything. Apparently he was correct, though. I mean... he's right?
 
You still don't get it. You rip women for being women ("bitch" "cankles") and when I criticize them it's for their voluntary conduct. Except for Sarah Sanders but I've been pretty reserved, even with her. "Tranny" is bad? Don't they call themselves "Transexuals?" Now I can't even say Tranny here among frenemies? I didn't say "dick" was the cure -- I said your inability to have some minimum sexual competence is one of the root causes of your misogyny. The argument is reduced to "dick" by you - there you go, example #567. It's reduced to "dick." A woman would likely find more sexual and mental pleasure with a retarded, mute, eunich than she would with you and you're bitter. I know these things.



Rog and Nurse Ratchet, can you help me get this right? What exactly is the reason why nobody in Biff's administration is enforcing the law and charging Canklesbitchseizure bleeding stretchmarks Hillary? (I love women, btw. This is just how we guys that love women describe them if we disagree with them politically.)



I'm not endorsing his candidacy for anything. Apparently he was correct, though. I mean... he's right?

which are you?

 
curving-water.jpg


Dc_TxFwVQAA9HvJ
 
You still don't get it. You rip women for being women ("bitch" "cankles") and when I criticize them it's for their voluntary conduct. Except for Sarah Sanders but I've been pretty reserved, even with her. "Tranny" is bad? Don't they call themselves "Transexuals?" Now I can't even say Tranny here among frenemies? I didn't say "dick" was the cure -- I said your inability to have some minimum sexual competence is one of the root causes of your misogyny. The argument is reduced to "dick" by you - there you go, example #567. It's reduced to "dick." A woman would likely find more sexual and mental pleasure with a retarded, mute, eunich than she would with you and you're bitter. I know these things.
Damn, this is funny stuff shysterkine. A literal bucket of gumbo with your extreme dislike of being called out and your projection of your issues with women as the star ingredients. We'll call this shyster's incredible chicken (dislike of being out) and shrimp (your lady issues) gumbo.

What else do you have to throw in the pot today?
 
Damn, this is funny stuff shysterkine. A literal bucket of gumbo with your extreme dislike of being called out and your projection of your issues with women as the star ingredients. We'll call this shyster's incredible chicken (dislike of being out) and shrimp (your lady issues) gumbo.

What else do you have to throw in the pot today?
Rog and Nurse Ratchet, can you help me get this right? What exactly is the reason why nobody in Biff's administration is enforcing the law and charging Canklesbitchseizure bleeding stretchmarks Hillary? (I love women, btw. This is just how we guys that love women describe them if we disagree with them politically.)

I don't think you really answered my question. I put it in quotes for your ease of reference.
 
Ok. How about this? Sure it’s a cut and paste but it’s on point re: my specific prediction.

I struggle with something you might be able to help me with...

They have transcripts of what Flynn said to Kyslyak - they have transcripts of what Flynn told the FBI he told Kyslyak. How does his body language during the FBI interview in any way change the fact that he lied? Help me understand...
 
Ok. How about this? Sure it’s a cut and paste but it’s on point re: my specific prediction.


I really think you should hang your hopes on someone other than Flynn.

It’s very tough, almost unheard of, to “blow up” a plea bargain where the Defendant has already plead guilty.

This one comes off as wishful thinking approaching cheerleading to me.
 
I really think you should hang your hopes on someone other than Flynn.

It’s very tough, almost unheard of, to “blow up” a plea bargain where the Defendant has already plead guilty.

This one comes off as wishful thinking approaching cheerleading to me.

I’m not hanging hopes. I’m offering a specific measurable prediction. If I’m wrong I’ll own it.

there is a lot of smoke that I’m not wrong so we will see.

 
I really think you should hang your hopes on someone other than Flynn.

It’s very tough, almost unheard of, to “blow up” a plea bargain where the Defendant has already plead guilty.

This one comes off as wishful thinking approaching cheerleading to me.

You might as well engage moonies.
 
You might as well engage moonies.

See, no steam pressure in your posts anymore. I think your subconscious has accepted the winning and the Mondale type beating you have coming.

You’ve lost the Supreme Court for a generation.

I’m not saying we won’t have the ability to get rid of genders and marry our house cats someday, but we have successfully delayed it.
 
at least he has the balls to engage. your passive aggressive meandering isn’t effective. what are you worried about? eventually I’ll be proven right or wrong and you can react accordingly.

Hell he won't disengage. He still has the "balls" to engage NZ too, in the regular and I washed my hands of him way back.

You're proven wrong on the daily. At this point there's no set of facts that would dissuade your faith. Its a matter of personal identity.
 
See, no steam pressure in your posts anymore. I think your subconscious has accepted the winning and the Mondale type beating you have coming.

You’ve lost the Supreme Court for a generation.

I’m not saying we won’t have the ability to get rid of genders and marry our house cats someday, but we have successfully delayed it.

"We" duly noted and recorded.
 
I’m not hanging hopes. I’m offering a specific measurable prediction. If I’m wrong I’ll own it.

there is a lot of smoke that I’m not wrong so we will see.


You do realize Grassley can’t do anything in federal court where Flynn pled.

If you are basing your prediction on Grassley making noise, you are hanging hopes.

I will give you that you have called your shot...Flynn prosecution dismissed/overturned by midterm Election Day.
 
You do realize Grassley can’t do anything in federal court where Flynn pled.

If you are basing your prediction on Grassley making noise, you are hanging hopes.

I will give you that you have called your shot...Flynn prosecution dismissed/overturned by midterm Election Day.

Fair enough. That’s isn’t all I’m basing it on, it’s just the most public thing currently.
 

And you expect people to address the veracity and accuracy of such unverified, but multi-sourced tidbits/arguments without addressing the credibility of the admittedly “hit and miss” (according to you) proponents?

It honestly seems like you are attempting to give a sheen of credibility and reliability to folks that are nothing but rumor mongers.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT