Non sequitur.110 people are talking about this world-wide. And 0 people here.
Non sequitur.
No, those are legitimate observations. It’s seems to be the new “it” hobby on the board.Like the 47 times a day you say "Projection"?
Just pig out at the buffet table, they’ll never know you’re a spy.
Bless your heart. It’s not Secret Services job when it comes guest lists. It’s the Club employees/staff. Who is their Boss?But she was caught, so are you thinking “Good job, Secret Service” or “Bad job, Secret Service”?
Or are you just showing us your hate Trump boner again with something that isn’t related to either boners or Trump?
The article you cited said “expected guests”, right? It says nothing to preclude unexpected guests. Can’t I just show up at a resort unannounced and eat dinner if they have room for me?Bless your heart. It’s not Secret Services job when it comes guest lists. It’s the Club employees/staff. Who is their Boss?
I don’t work at a resort, this is a private club. She told them she was there to go swimming and then said it was to attend a function organized by the Wendy Yang, the Chinese national selling influence to other foreign nationals at Mar-A-Lago, also the former owner of the massage spa the fbi just busted for human trafficking.The article you cited said “expected guests”, right? It says nothing to preclude unexpected guests. Can’t I just show up at a resort unannounced and eat dinner if they have room for me?
What you’re saying makes much more sense after reading an actual news article on the subject instead of something from the opinion page. Here’s one from the same newspaper, only without all the sarcasm:I don’t work at a resort, this is a private club. She told them she was there to go swimming and then said it was to attend a function organized by the Wendy Yang, the Chinese national selling influence to other foreign nationals at Mar-A-Lago, also the former owner of the massage spa the fbi just busted for human trafficking.
Both are Miami Herald. Her opinion is based off this reporting. Glad you read both though!What you’re saying makes much more sense after reading an actual news article on the subject instead of something from the opinion page. Here’s one from the same newspaper, only without all the sarcasm:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article228738969.html
Would surprise me. Imagine how much worse it would be for the President of the United States than the senior senator form California. Glad she doesn’t own/operate a private club open to foreign agent infiltration as President. That’s be a huge scandal.Let's hope we don't find out that Trump's driver of 20 years is a Chinese spy. We'll all lose our minds.
Would surprise me. Imagine how much worse it would be for the President of the United States than the senior senator form California. Glad she doesn’t own/operate a private club open to foreign agent infiltration as President. That’s be a huge scandal.
Would that be like a secretary of state having an unsecured email server in her basement and a bunch of emails on her aide's pedophile's husband's laptop level scandal?Would surprise me. Imagine how much worse it would be for the President of the United States than the senior senator form California. Glad she doesn’t own/operate a private club open to foreign agent infiltration as President. That’s be a huge scandal.
No, you’d have to have a lick of sense to understand that one is vastly different from the others. We’re there charges brought? I can’t remember, seems like Secretary of State doesn’t have the DOJ OLC memo protecting her from indictment like a sitting president does.Would that be like a secretary of state having an unsecured email server in her basement and a bunch of emails on her aide's pedophile's husband's laptop level scandal?
I know, ya dork! That’s why I chose that article! I even referenced that it was the same paper. Go take a nap!Both are Miami Herald. Her opinion is based off this reporting. Glad you read both though!
Trump could get indicted for some Chinese lady showing up at his club uninvited if he wasn't the president? What crime did he commit? That sounds serious.No, you’d have to have a lick of sense to understand that one is vastly different from the others. We’re there charges brought? I can’t remember, seems like Secretary of State doesn’t have the DOJ OSC memo protecting her from indictment like a sitting president does.
You. Are. Bananas.Trump could get indicted for some Chinese lady showing up at his club uninvited if he wasn't the president? What crime did he commit? That sounds serious.
You act as if the suspect wasn’t apprehended.Would surprise me. Imagine how much worse it would be for the President of the United States than the senior senator form California. Glad she doesn’t own/operate a private club open to foreign agent infiltration as President. That’s be a huge scandal.
Mother Jones? L-O-LYou. Are. Bananas.
And we probably already know who the mystery man is. Look at the jacket. It's either Dr. Evil or Hillary Clinton without hair.You. Are. Bananas.
This one, and only because reception thought something was up. Secret Service thought there was a language barrier and brought her in anyway. Ma-A-Lago is a national security risk, wether you agree with me or not. Thems the breaks kid.You act as if the suspect wasn’t apprehended.
You’re assuming they haven’t tightened things up after this incident. I don’t know whether they have or not. Do you?This one, and only because reception thought something was up. Secret Service thought there was a language barrier and brought her in anyway. Ma-A-Lago is a nation security risk, wether you agree with me or not. Thems the breaks kid.
Their tightening up security now doesn’t take away from the previous two + years. The President of the United States should not be operating a private for profit club. It falls in the constitution under the emoluments clause. This fact alone is why he should be impeached. However the constitution is only meaningless scratches on parchment if the words have no meaning and aren’t enforced by the congress.You’re assuming they haven’t tightened things up after this incident. I don’t know whether they have or not. Do you?
That's definitely an opinion.You’re literally an idiot.
I guess they should just put a no spies sign out front next to the no guns sign. That’ll fix it.
Speculative, but am open to learn about other incidents if you have any.Their tightening up security now doesn’t take away from the previous two + years.
So boring.The President of the United States should not be operating a private for profit club. It falls in the constitution under the emoluments clause. This fact alone is why he should be impeached. However the constitution is only meaningless scratches on parchment if the words have no meaning and aren’t enforced by the congress.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/us/politics/mar-a-lago-north-korea-trump.htmlSpeculative, but am open to learn about other incidents if you have any.
Not to those who take our national security seriously. Like oh say, the founding fathers.So boring.
No details about what was said? Well, that pretty much turns this story into a big nothing, right?
I can lead to horse to water but I can’t make it see the glaringly obvious national security crisis the president has created with Mar a Lago. To the glue factory, with this one.No details about what was said? Well, that pretty much turns this story into a big nothing, right?
Give us the details of something other than pics taken from out of earshot.Not to those who take our national security seriously. Like oh say, the founding fathers.
For a crisis to exist, wouldn’t we need to have some evidence that some damage occurred? All you are showing is potentially risky behavior. And I could possibly agree with you on that with more information. But you’re trying to stretch this into something that’s not there, seems to me.I can lead to horse to water but I can’t make it see the glaringly obvious national security crisis the president has created with Mar a Lago. To the glue factory, with this one.
Bwaaahahahahahahaha!glaringly obvious national security crisis the president has created with Mar a Lago.
Their tightening up security now doesn’t take away from the previous two + years. The President of the United States should not be operating a private for profit club. It falls in the constitution under the emoluments clause. This fact alone is why he should be impeached. However the constitution is only meaningless scratches on parchment if the words have no meaning and aren’t enforced by the congress.
It probably is shocking to see a politician get rich before he becomes a politician. I assure you this is how it should be.