ADVERTISEMENT

Jim Jordan for Speaker of the House

Then guilty

You’ve declared guilt with no other fact other than MSM Pussyhats

You’ve also ignored statements in support calling the accusations baseless

You’re wondering into an ideological world David.

Whet makes you so convinced he’s not at fault here?
 
Last thing you want to do is get into circumstantial evidence.

All I’ve been asking for is a realinvestogTion instead of the phony BS that’s taken place.
And your opinion on the appropriateness of an HRC presidency was unaffected by the allegations and investigations, right?
Even if it wasn't, most sane people prefer not to have people under suspicion of doing horrible things occupying the highest positions of nation leadership.
 
And your opinion on the appropriateness of an HRC presidency was unaffected by the allegations and investigations, right?
Even if it wasn't, most sane people prefer not to have people under suspicion of doing horrible things occupying the highest positions of nation leadership.

My opinion was based on her platform and ideology which I oppose almost 100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitter Creek
My opinion was based on her platform and ideology which I oppose almost 100%
Do you think your are representative of the average American Voter in that respect? Meaning do you think the suspicion and investigation had no impact?
 
laughing at loud that proven is now the standard.

How many people have the Clintons killed now?

No clue. I have personally said on this board that I think their number is a big fat 0.

Back to Jim and your laughter, were the accusations proven?
 
I am just seeing if you apply the rules of innocent until proven guilty to all jobs, or just for the position third in line to the presidency.

I eill help you out

I don't apply the rules for innocent until proven guilty as the same for all crimes and/or all jobs. I don't see these acquisitions as endangering anyone if he gets the Speaker job and it turns out to be true.

Maybe you can explain who will be additionally endangered if the worse is proven to be true.
 
I eill help you out

I don't apply the rules for innocent until proven guilty as the same for all crimes and/or all jobs. I don't see these acquisitions as endangering anyone if he gets the Speaker job and it turns out to be true.

Maybe you can explain who will be additionally endangered if the worse is proven to be true.
Thanks for the explanation. If the accusation are true for Jordan, would you want him to still be speaker?
 
Does the increasing intensity of the investigations at Ohio State maybe give you a hint that there’s not 250 kids ganging up to lie, as Jordan has suggested?

You have obviously followed the story more closely than I have since you are able to quote a number. I heard that there were kids that said xxx happened 20 something years ago and that there were also those lining up that said that it didn't.

Regardless, I don't want to see anyone hung, regardless of their political views unless they are proven guilty. Do you?
 
But why? He isn't endangering anyone as speaker. We could probably keep a better eye on him as speaker.

As long as you are willing to penalize candidates on both sides based solely upon accusations, you should keep with your plan.
 
Do you think your are representative of the average American Voter in that respect? Meaning do you think the suspicion and investigation had no impact?

I don’t think the email stuff and other suspicions had a real impact.

The anti-Hillary voter felt more justified in their position

The pro-Hillary voter felt it was a wingnut conspiracy and felt justified in their thoughts about anti-Hillary voters
 
As long as you are willing to penalize candidates on both sides based solely upon accusations, you should keep with your plan.
There are levels to this shit. I don't think Jordan should be impeached over this, but surely the GOP can find a speaker that isn't under suspicion of covering up sex crimes. I definitely didn't think that HRC should be the Democratic Nominee, and would have supported Franken for Senate Minority Leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitter Creek
I don’t think the email stuff and other suspicions had a real impact.

The anti-Hillary voter felt more justified in their position

The pro-Hillary voter felt it was a wingnut conspiracy and felt justified in their thoughts about anti-Hillary voters
Hard to say in a national election swung by 80,000 votes.
There was a lot of time spent on "lock her up" chants for such a meaningless issue.
 
There are levels to this shit. I don't think Jordan should be impeached over this, but surely the GOP can find a speaker that isn't under suspicion of covering up sex crimes. I definitely didn't think that HRC should be the Democratic Nominee, and would have supported Franken for Senate Minority Leader.

I agree with both of these statements.

I just don't want us to get to the point where all Team #1 has to do to take out the candidate for Team #2 is to trot out some accusers. I know that it has been this way for 100+ years, but I really don't want to call him guilty until that has been proven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TD_4OSU
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT