Other than aiding and abetting a serial abuser of youth, he's pretty much alright, amiright?
Other than aiding and abetting a serial abuser of youth, he's pretty much alright, amiright?
No, just another POS hypocrite who found his home on the right side of the aisle.Guilty before proven innocent
Amiright
No, just another POS hypocrite who found his home on the right side of the aisle.
Then guilty
You’ve declared guilt with no other fact other than MSM Pussyhats
You’ve also ignored statements in support calling the accusations baseless
You’re wondering into an ideological world David.
No, just another POS hypocrite who found his home on the right side of the aisle.
Lock him up! Lock him up!Then guilty
You’ve declared guilt with no other fact other than MSM Pussyhats
You’ve also ignored statements in support calling the accusations baseless
You’re wondering into an ideological world David.
Other than aiding and abetting a serial abuser of youth, he's pretty much alright, amiright?
laughing at loud that proven is now the standard.Was that proven?
Lock him up! Lock him up!
Last thing you want to do is get into circumstantial evidence.
All I’ve been asking for is a realinvestogTion instead of the phony BS that’s taken place.
And your opinion on the appropriateness of an HRC presidency was unaffected by the allegations and investigations, right?Last thing you want to do is get into circumstantial evidence.
All I’ve been asking for is a realinvestogTion instead of the phony BS that’s taken place.
And your opinion on the appropriateness of an HRC presidency was unaffected by the allegations and investigations, right?
Even if it wasn't, most sane people prefer not to have people under suspicion of doing horrible things occupying the highest positions of nation leadership.
Do you think your are representative of the average American Voter in that respect? Meaning do you think the suspicion and investigation had no impact?My opinion was based on her platform and ideology which I oppose almost 100%
laughing at loud that proven is now the standard.
How many people have the Clintons killed now?
No clue. I have personally said on this board that I think their number is a big fat 0.
Back to Jim and your laughter, were the accusations proven?
You allow child molesters to babysit for you until they have had their day in court?No clue. I have personally said on this board that I think their number is a big fat 0.
Back to Jim and your laughter, were the accusations proven?
Early stages...lawsuits being filed
You allow child molesters to babysit for you until they have had their day in court?
Hey, don't judge your babysitter's crimes before they are proven!The speaker of the house takes care of kids?
who knew
Hey, don't judge your babysitter's crimes before they are proven!
I am just seeing if you apply the rules of innocent until proven guilty to all jobs, or just for the position third in line to the presidency.I just want to know how you are relating this to it being a danger for little ones for him to be considered for Speaker.
I am just seeing if you apply the rules of innocent until proven guilty to all jobs, or just for the position third in line to the presidency.
Thanks for the explanation. If the accusation are true for Jordan, would you want him to still be speaker?I eill help you out
I don't apply the rules for innocent until proven guilty as the same for all crimes and/or all jobs. I don't see these acquisitions as endangering anyone if he gets the Speaker job and it turns out to be true.
Maybe you can explain who will be additionally endangered if the worse is proven to be true.
Thanks for the explanation. If the accusation are true for Jordan, would you want him to still be speaker?
Nope. I would want him to be in jail.
What about when he gets out?Nope. I would want him to be in jail.
Does the increasing intensity of the investigations at Ohio State maybe give you a hint that there’s not 250 kids ganging up to lie, as Jordan has suggested?
But why? He isn't endangering anyone as speaker. We could probably keep a better eye on him as speaker.He would still be a bad option
But why? He isn't endangering anyone as speaker. We could probably keep a better eye on him as speaker.
Do you think your are representative of the average American Voter in that respect? Meaning do you think the suspicion and investigation had no impact?
There are levels to this shit. I don't think Jordan should be impeached over this, but surely the GOP can find a speaker that isn't under suspicion of covering up sex crimes. I definitely didn't think that HRC should be the Democratic Nominee, and would have supported Franken for Senate Minority Leader.As long as you are willing to penalize candidates on both sides based solely upon accusations, you should keep with your plan.
Hard to say in a national election swung by 80,000 votes.I don’t think the email stuff and other suspicions had a real impact.
The anti-Hillary voter felt more justified in their position
The pro-Hillary voter felt it was a wingnut conspiracy and felt justified in their thoughts about anti-Hillary voters
There are levels to this shit. I don't think Jordan should be impeached over this, but surely the GOP can find a speaker that isn't under suspicion of covering up sex crimes. I definitely didn't think that HRC should be the Democratic Nominee, and would have supported Franken for Senate Minority Leader.