Iran Deal? No way. North Korea Deal? MAGA
- Thread starter CSCOTTOSUPOKES
- Start date
Why help a country who agrees to disarm with their economy when you can just bribe them with 150 billion and a deal that let's them certify themselves in compliance and leaves them with the capability of building a nuke immediately after the agreement expires.
Hope Trump can get a good deal like Obama and Kerry.
Hope Trump can get a good deal like Obama and Kerry.
you think those deals will have a little different language, teeth and effectiveness? i do.
We haven't seen the North Korea deal. Is it online some place? Link so we can check it out?
I hope this thread doesn't turn out to be a complete failure like your life is.
boy you and sys have really hit your intellectual stride today.
"anything yet" and cheerleader jokes coming from two grown men who still believe in russian collusion is unintentional comedy gold.
This is where Sys likes to post his Trump get out of jail meme
Sys is defeated. He was really down today. I think as trump’s approval goes up his life force goes down. I honestly thought I would enjoy it more but I hate to see the old boy so sullen. It’s like a dog sniffing around for a place to die.
Damn, get it right. He's sniffing his ass for the perfect place to lickamus.
I finally found the deal the US and North Korea just signed. Here it is in its entirety:
Good deal? Bad deal? Let's hear the hot takes.
As a side note, it is pretty weird that it looks exactly like Clinton's plans to move out of his parent's house. Was Clintoon the Ketchup Boy of the North Korea deal? @CSCOTTOSUPOKES, can you give us your Junior Achievement take on the specifics of this deal?
Good deal? Bad deal? Let's hear the hot takes.
As a side note, it is pretty weird that it looks exactly like Clinton's plans to move out of his parent's house. Was Clintoon the Ketchup Boy of the North Korea deal? @CSCOTTOSUPOKES, can you give us your Junior Achievement take on the specifics of this deal?
We have signed agreements twice with the DPRK before under this same scenario ( the difference being they didn't actually have nuclear weapons, it was to stop them developing them) and both times as soon as we relaxed sanctions and helped them they broke the agreement, I hope for success but shouldn't be too optimistic.
Thank you, I find it wildly entertaining. You and the proudbois got your pompoms ready for another day of misogyny and booger eating?
Biff's administration charged Hillary for any of her crimes yet? Sure seems to be taking a long time.
Yes trump already collapsed the one but if you read there is ten years worth of shit to blow up and fill in.
This thread worked well.
Lol.
Carry on.
Lol.
Carry on.
attacking the source isn’t an argument. and he’s not the only source saying this.
is your argument going to be that it didn’t happen. Or that it doesn’t matter?
Let’s assume they did...
Why would they do it? And don’t give me your usual MAGA bullsh!t “weaponized anti-Trump FBI” line lolz.
my usual stuff is logically and intellectually devastating to your salon quiz level understanding of politics. I understand why you don’t want the usual.
having said that, read your reply over and over until you realize you’ve answered your own semi literate question.
Why have all the FBI agents linked to this all been fired or demoted? How many do you think rolled over?
Wtf does that have to do with what I asked you?
Use your brain for once. Think critically. Deduce logic and reasoning.
It isn’t hard.
"confirmation that he could have been framed" ....talk about a possible definite maybe.....perhaps................
There was confirmation that an alien spacecraft could have crashed outside of Roswell.......I am sure if there was one in the area, it could have, but their probably wasn't one in the area
so what’s your position beyond attacking the messenger?
The messenger is a large part of the problem. People see that headline and do think he is being framed. Show the evidence.There is a possibility anything could happen , that does not mean it has. Fox has turned into nothing but the Presidential propaganda office.
Just look at the Fox and Friends tweet......."Now we're getting confirmation that President Trump could have been framed by the FBI over a manufactured crime".........He has not been charged with any crime, so how could he have been framed?
The FBI does not need to "frame" him.......his own tweets and his spokesmen like Rudy Giuliani are giving the FBI more evidence than they could have ever hoped for. Every one of his tweets are an official record, as are his interviews, the same way the NIxon tapes were.
The Special counsel was appointed, by President Trump's own person because the President fired the FBI director and then went on TV and said he fired him because of the Russia investigation........he cannot do that, the President cannot fire the FBI director because the FBI director is investigating him, that is illegal.
You are falling into the toon town trap that Fox is pro trump. There are people on Fox that are pro trump. But channel versus channel and all content out against its competitors they get after trump and report on his shortcomings way more than the liberals would ever get after their own.
But let’s talk this through. Let’s sssume Fox is pro trump even during the day and in their hard news shows.
So what? Is it your contention the main stream media should be 95% liberal or maybe 80% as it is with fox being outnumbered as conservative? Would this be a healthy country if Fox were just msnbc or cnn but with hot chicks? Is that your gripe?
That always told me what a straight up pussy obama was. One channel gives you grief? You can’t have one cable channel against you when you have the other two and the alphabets doing your bidding no matter how silly they look?
Thank god we have something like fox or this would be Stalinist Russia or China or Cuba.
so, your position is that is ok to attack the messenger and avoid directly addressing the message?
Isn’t that what Trump does on a daily basis?
You seem to have a double standard when it comes to sources of information. One side gets the presumption of accuracy and the message must be addressed. The other immediately gets dismissed as fake news.
Did I do something specific to suddenly become a target for my journalistic standards?
I don’t like to see clear double standards seemingly based on personal partisan stances from a poster whom I typically hold in pretty high regard for his critical analysis and critical thinking skills.
That’s it.
Last edited:
