nypost.com
Seriously? Every interview production ever had edited interviews for length and clarity. These are not longform interviews they are going to broadcast in their entirety for a lot of reasons. They probably had 2 hours with Kamala and boiled it down to about 15 minutes of air time to hit the most interesting aspectsCBS accused of deceptively editing interviews yet again as Speaker Johnson claims interview was ‘selectively’ trimmed
Johnson, 52, posted three clips showing how his “Face The Nation” answers on topics including hurricane relief and election integrity were edited.
On top of the leftist propaganda show 60 Minutes caught editing their interview with Kamala here they edited Face The Nation's interview of Speaker Johnson.
Yea that's why they changed her answer to the question, editing. In the words of JD Vance, do you hear yourself? LMAO
Having watched the clips side by side, yes they did change her answer. IMO it was an effort to keep her from looking like the rambling idiot she is. Feel free to have your own opinion LMAO
They do it all time for political purposes. See Nicholas Sandman or Kyle Rittenhouse. Or Hunter’s laptop. Or how about if you get the COVID shot you can never give COVID to grandma. You can go on and on. It is all about controlling the narrative. And this happened from a network that has repeatedly pushed false narratives. Talk about naive and blind.The didnt "change her answer." They just didn't publish the FULL answer for the sake of time/clarity, etc. which is totally normal and news mags like this do all the freaking time. They did publish longer forms to the answer in several other locations - so you cant pretend they were trying to hide anything. Just admit you didnt realize that news magazines and TV shows edit interviews and don't understand how things work
They absolutely did not do it for "political purposes," if they did why would they publish the longer answer on other platforms
Y'all just want to say something
Live in your own echo chamber. They do this to Trump all the time. And skip right past intentional misrepresentation of the facts by lib legacy media like it is a nothing burger. Problem is now? More and more the public is understanding the severe slant in "reporting". Without all the lies the lib media has spewed for over 8 years? Trump wins in a landslide.They absolutely did not do it for "political purposes," if they did why would they publish the longer answer on other platforms
Come on man don't be stupid. Your argument was chugging along just fine until you typed this drivel.
Both parties take things out of context and republish it, lol. Y'all are cooked. Trump is a literal moron, i've listened to his FULL speeches and long form interviews and the guy is incoherent about 30% of the time and rambles nonsense non answers 80% of the time. It takes people like you to try to "explain" what he meant. 20% across the board tariffs are batshit crazy and will 100% be inflationary. EVERYONE with any sense agrees.
If they were hiding something for political purposes why would they publish the longer answer on other outlets? Wouldn't that directly contradict their aim?
Look, I am not sure why you are here and who you are trying to convince. I don't know 1 undecided voter on this site. I ask myself that question at times as well. Why do we all do this every day? Why not flip each other off and go about our day? 47% of Libs don't care if Trump is assassinated. One side just wants to vote an administration out, the other wants to take out their political opponent thru lawfare or assassination. 2 failed and fake impeachments. We are as divided as the polling indicates, in deeply entrenched positions. One side, obviously can not fathom being removed from power democratically, another reason why Biden was forced out.
1) I'm a lifelong republican, who was president of college republicans, member of the federalist society, worked on GOP campaigns and given more money to republicans than democrats.
