and you should too.
If you engage him, you're just accepting and encouraging.
Made a bet. Won't honor it. Done with him.
If you engage him, you're just accepting and encouraging.
Made a bet. Won't honor it. Done with him.
I put Sys on Ignore
- Thread starter shortbus
- Start date
There are bigger dbags on here than sys. If I block him I won't get to see him get destroyed everyday. Like Every. Single. Day.
syskatine is like watching those drunk walking fail videos. Although you can predict every single outcome, it still makes you laugh your ass off when you watch it.
I'm not sure I can cut out one of the joys of this board. I'll check back in to see what the overall experience has been before I jump on board.
I'm not sure I can cut out one of the joys of this board. I'll check back in to see what the overall experience has been before I jump on board.
Well crap, I'll do it. I'm going to miss discussing banana clips and his arsenal though.
I feel that Clinton can perhaps feel the void. Opportunity knocks.
I feel that Clinton can perhaps feel the void. Opportunity knocks.
I get what you guys are saying, but to me it's principle. As much as I enjoy his idiocy, it's kind of like letting somebody continually bang your girlfriend over and over and staying with her because you enjoy listening to her complain about how big a mistake it was to cheat on you with someone so bad at sex.
If you ever reach the point where you start treating people like shit in order to make you feel better about yourself, we will ignore you as well.
If I wanted to read stupid shit I'd spend my time on Huff Post.
You already have a natural ignore function. I just don't get it. Why not just not engage?
I can ride a horse to Stillwater for games, but why not drive a car?
I really just am tired of seeing his stupid posts. It was funny for a bit, but then it was just annoying.
Also, it's a way for me to reject his bankruptcy and enforce the bet. So, I guess he's not as smart as he thought.
Also, it's a way for me to reject his bankruptcy and enforce the bet. So, I guess he's not as smart as he thought.
Seriously?? That's like, every single poster in this forum when I got here.
I thought it was in the by-laws of the forum it is so rampant: If you don't agree with someone, be a complete d!ck to them, then make fun of them when they ask you why you are being a complete d!ck to them.
Maybe people see too much of themselves in him and don't like what they see.
I use the built in ignore function of not responding on more posts and responses than not, as does everyone else.
I read all the posts on this board. Many of us are very active.
I don't want him to have the benefit of knowing his worthless drivel is even being read.
i like being mean to him and I don't have to worry about being questioned by police when he kills himself.
Just let the record show, you're late to the game. I can "fill in the blanks" given the responses to my ignore list's comments. So much more calming, and I don't waste time responding to idiocy.
Besides, there's always this reminder:
Nah. You haven't been around here very much. It's been a long time coming.
I would suggest the only person who should be talking about enforcing the bet is the person who took the other side... as I recall he signed off on the compromise proposed by a third party.
What is annoying is starting a thread or even bothering to note you have someone on ignore. That is a p*ssy move IMO.
You use the term pussy in a negative context. I thought liberals were post sexist. Should he "man up?"
A pussy move? How do? Rather than doing it behind his back I let him know I'm not going to deal with him because he has no integrity.
His words no longer have value. Before, they were mostly ridiculous and usually wrong but they were at least his opinion, however misguided, and it could be trusted given the benefit of doubt, that he meant those words.
Now he has proven that not to be the case. So I'm done with him.
TO: THOSE IGNORING ME BECAUSE OF OBNOXIOUS POSTS.
A few conservative posters either:
1. run the liberals off the board,
2. hound them until they're asking for mercy, or
3. require a safe zone to insulate yourself.
It warms my heart that conservatives now try to organize mass safe zones to keep out the only consistent liberal poster on the board. I'm the third option and that pleases me. So in regard to this conservative backlash against my posts, you may take your safe zone, curl up and kiss me arse. And the rest of you can take notice who it is that really needs safe zones. I'm outnumbered 25-1, have taken a terrabyte of abuse and never called for a safe zone. The conservatives start 95% of the shitty behavior on here. Total beta moves imo but I'm not surprised. You can go make bestiality jokes with jimmybob with zero interference from me.
TO: THOSE IGNORING ME BECAUSE OF WELCHING.
I man many things, but a welcher is not one. These are facts, not opinions:
For those that are unaware, GunsofFrank took my boasting and gloating offer of a wager and raised my bet to a 2 year ban if Trump won. Trump won, I bid adieu and shut up... and was invited back. Mega proposed that I come back and fly an avatar and sig of Frank's choice for a year. Frank and I both agreed. As you can see, I now have an avatar of Donald trump crossing the Delaware, holding an eagle on one arm, a gatling gun in the other, a flag waving behind him and an apocalyptic landscape behind him. Not my first choice. Everything I say has "Wrong" flashing after it. Again, not my first choice. We made a new deal, and I am honoring the deal, just as I did the previous deal. Mega brokered this very publicly.
None of you accepted my very public, repeated offers to exile me for an even longer time or fly an avatar of your choice, or whatever we could work out, and I was very open. These are facts. The times were dark for Trump, and the polls were in HRC's favor and only Frank stepped out and staked a 2 year exile. None of those chickenshits that complain now about welching were willing to take the bet and thereby control it. So I didn't make a promise to them. I made it to Frank. He claimed Trump would win months before the election and was confident enough to bet based on his own judgment. None of you were. Feel free to tell me where I'm wrong.
You all want to take the benefit of Frank's first deal, but you wouldn't accept the risk. Very simple. You don't get to enforce the bet -- Frank does. This is very simple.
First, a deal is a deal, and Frank and I have made a deal.
Second, if you don't like the way Frank and I handled it, then have the cajones to step out and make the bet next time. None of you did - you sat in the shadows and watched while a smarter, ballsier conservative do it, and he made the deal you detest.
I man many things, but a welcher is not one. These are facts, not opinions:
For those that are unaware, GunsofFrank took my boasting and gloating offer of a wager and raised my bet to a 2 year ban if Trump won. Trump won, I bid adieu and shut up... and was invited back. Mega proposed that I come back and fly an avatar and sig of Frank's choice for a year. Frank and I both agreed. As you can see, I now have an avatar of Donald trump crossing the Delaware, holding an eagle on one arm, a gatling gun in the other, a flag waving behind him and an apocalyptic landscape behind him. Not my first choice. Everything I say has "Wrong" flashing after it. Again, not my first choice. We made a new deal, and I am honoring the deal, just as I did the previous deal. Mega brokered this very publicly.
None of you accepted my very public, repeated offers to exile me for an even longer time or fly an avatar of your choice, or whatever we could work out, and I was very open. These are facts. The times were dark for Trump, and the polls were in HRC's favor and only Frank stepped out and staked a 2 year exile. None of those chickenshits that complain now about welching were willing to take the bet and thereby control it. So I didn't make a promise to them. I made it to Frank. He claimed Trump would win months before the election and was confident enough to bet based on his own judgment. None of you were. Feel free to tell me where I'm wrong.
You all want to take the benefit of Frank's first deal, but you wouldn't accept the risk. Very simple. You don't get to enforce the bet -- Frank does. This is very simple.
First, a deal is a deal, and Frank and I have made a deal.
Second, if you don't like the way Frank and I handled it, then have the cajones to step out and make the bet next time. None of you did - you sat in the shadows and watched while a smarter, ballsier conservative do it, and he made the deal you detest.
So, you're posting to people that are ignoring you? That's like Hillary smart.
Wow! Look at the tough guy. Of course you'd use "pussy" to negatively describe someone's actions. Not very progressive of you.
I'm sorry, what hypocrisy?
The OP is so sensitive that he needs to ignore another poster, he is so insecure he needs to announce it to the world and beg for validation from others. Calling that out is hypocritical?
If you mean I used a crass word to describe his sensitive nature - yeah sorry I offended you.
