ADVERTISEMENT

I guess that's one way to deal with war criminals.

While it's a good thing people like this are no longer on the face of the planet, you have to wonder why this guy was targeted for assassination.
 
While it's a good thing people like this are no longer on the face of the planet, you have to wonder why this guy was targeted for assassination.
Why do you wonder? He directed missiles be fired into civilian apartments.
 
He's the only one who directed missile attacks on civilian apartments?

How the fvck would I know that? If not, then so what? You gotta start somewhere if you look at it form the Ukrainian perspective.

Imagine if a foreign power did that to american civilians over and over and we could find out who the commanders were that ordered the hits.
 
How the fvck would I know that? If not, then so what? You gotta start somewhere if you look at it form the Ukrainian perspective.

Imagine if a foreign power did that to american civilians over and over and we could find out who the commanders were that ordered the hits.
We do not have to imagine how you and your party would react, we have your reaction to Trump taking out Qasem Soleimani. Once again your previous actions come back to haunt you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skylinepoke
We do not have to imagine how you and your party would react, we have your reaction to Trump taking out Qasem Soleimani. Once again your previous actions come back to haunt you.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

You and your party would've abandoned Ukraine and let Putin have it a year ago.

We can always count on MAGA -- if Russia would've invaded, MAGA would've met their soldiers in gas masks because MAGA thinks they're here to save us from airborn vaccines and trannie syrup, or maybe because the democrats are about to make all babies drink whiskey. whatever, MAGA would've done something internationally stupid. You know -- like Trump supporting Putin!
 
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

You and your party would've abandoned Ukraine and let Putin have it a year ago.

We can always count on MAGA -- if Russia would've invaded, MAGA would've met their soldiers in gas masks because MAGA thinks they're here to save us from airborn vaccines and trannie syrup, or maybe because the democrats are about to make all babies drink whiskey. whatever, MAGA would've done something internationally stupid. You know -- like Trump supporting Putin!
Trump wouldn't have allowed Putin to invade Ukraine. Then we wouldn't be involved in this cluster fvck.
If you remember Biden had a year to thwart the invasion and did nothing. IMO Biden wanted Putin to invade Ukraine and wants it to drag on as long as possible.
 
Trump wouldn't have allowed Putin to invade Ukraine. Then we wouldn't be involved in this cluster fvck.
If you remember Biden had a year to thwart the invasion and did nothing. IMO Biden wanted Putin to invade Ukraine and wants it to drag on as long as possible.
LMFAO he'd have participated in the invasion is he could do it with zero personal risk. The Zelensky shakedown, "Putin's a genius", Helsinki, they weren't a mirage. I know the cult leaders don't discuss that stuff, but the rest of the world remembers it.

Biden's looking pretty good and as usual, Trump was wrong. Like, shit down both legs wrong.
 
LMFAO he'd have participated in the invasion is he could do it with zero personal risk. The Zelensky shakedown, "Putin's a genius", Helsinki, they weren't a mirage. I know the cult leaders don't discuss that stuff, but the rest of the world remembers it.

Biden's looking pretty good and as usual, Trump was wrong. Like, shit down both legs wrong.
Biden has us in a war that is drawing down our military equipment and costing us billions. It's bad enough that even Biden has admitted we are running low on ammunition and are having to resort to sending Cluster Bombs. That is not a good look no matter how you want to spin it.
 
Biden has us in a war that is drawing down our military equipment and costing us billions. It's bad enough that even Biden has admitted we are running low on ammunition and are having to resort to sending Cluster Bombs. That is not a good look no matter how you want to spin it.
LMFAO I'm sorry Putin's suffering a devastating defeat by American equipment.

I gotta admit, I'm not really sorry that you have to watch as billions of dollars of american resources goes to defeat Vladimir Putin and you have to sit and watch this develop. It's like a daily, slow-motion reminder of how effin' dumb and corrupt Trump and MAGA really is.
 
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

You and your party would've abandoned Ukraine and let Putin have it a year ago.

We can always count on MAGA -- if Russia would've invaded, MAGA would've met their soldiers in gas masks because MAGA thinks they're here to save us from airborn vaccines and trannie syrup, or maybe because the democrats are about to make all babies drink whiskey. whatever, MAGA would've done something internationally stupid. You know -- like Trump supporting Putin!
WTF kind of babble is this? Are you speaking in tongues?
 
LMFAO I'm sorry Putin's suffering a devastating defeat by American equipment.

I gotta admit, I'm not really sorry that you have to watch as billions of dollars of american resources goes to defeat Vladimir Putin and you have to sit and watch this develop. It's like a daily, slow-motion reminder of how effin' dumb and corrupt Trump and MAGA really is.
In all honesty do you really believe Russia is suffering a devastating defeat in Ukraine?
 
LMFAO I'm sorry Putin's suffering a devastating defeat by American equipment.

I gotta admit, I'm not really sorry that you have to watch as billions of dollars of american resources goes to defeat Vladimir Putin and you have to sit and watch this develop. It's like a daily, slow-motion reminder of how effin' dumb and corrupt Trump and MAGA really is.
What does that defeat look like? Is it just Putin leaving Ukraine, Putin's removal from power, the fall of Russia or something else? Tell us what your definition of defeating Putin looks like.
 
Yes. Putin, too.

I guess you think he's doing pretty well?
I think he's doing better than Ukraine. From what I've read Russia has established a near impenetrable defensive front that cannot be breached without air and artillery superiority, neither of which Ukraine has. Their counter-offensive is reduced to human attacks across open fields that is getting their soldiers slaughtered. I've read that the difference in casualties is anywhere between 3 to 1 and 7 to 1. If those numbers are anywhere near accurate I'd say Russia has the upper hand. If you're reading different accounts I'd love to know what and where I can read them myself.


I have linked to this website before. It is highly partisan in support of Russia, you can’t lose sight of that fact. But if it’s remotely accurate things look bad for Ukraine.


 
Last edited:
I think he's doing better than Ukraine. From what I've read Russia has established a near impenetrable defensive front that cannot be breached without air and artillery superiority, neither of which Ukraine has. Their counter-offensive is reduced to human attacks across open fields that is getting their soldiers slaughtered. I've read that the difference in casualties is anywhere between 3 to 1 and 7 to 1. If those numbers are anywhere near accurate I'd say Russia has the upper hand. If you're reading different accounts I'd love to know what and where I can read them myself.


I have linked to this website before. It is highly partisan in support of Russia, you can’t lose sight of that fact. But if it’s remotely accurate things look bad for Ukraine.


Dan, lol. You admit it's highly sympathetic to Russia and then base your opinions on it. I just have no words for you, my man. You raise hell about the lying governments in the west, the lying media, don't listen to them, and then pass along russian propaganda. Man it's weird who you give your ear to.
 
Not working out real well for anyone IMO.
Well, yeah, it's awful.

And I know it pains you to say it, but Putin miscalculated horribly and is losing a war, if it is not already lost and now it's just all a war to save face for Putin.

Ukraine did nothing to deserve any of it. Those civilians did nothing to deserve it.

Putin's rapidly becoming the biggest mass murderer of this century and Donald Trump helped him and tried to shake down Ukraine. Joseph Biden then beat Donald Trump and armed Ukraine to resist Putin. Biff's Russia policy was comically wrong.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OUSOONER67
Well, yeah, it's awful.

And I know it pains you to say it, but Putin miscalculated horribly and is losing a war, if it is not already lost and now it's just all a war to save face for Putin.

Ukraine did nothing to deserve any of it. Those civilians did nothing to deserve it.

Putin's rapidly becoming the biggest mass murderer of this century and Donald Trump helped him and tried to shake down Ukraine. Joseph Biden then beat Donald Trump and armed Ukraine to resist Putin. Biff's Russia policy was comically wrong.
That’s why Biden should have stopped it before it ever happened but he didn’t. He sat back did nothing and pushed Putin to invade.
Based on history I can’t blame Putin for not wanting a NATO country on his border. Same way we can not allow Russia and now China in CUBA.
 
Dan, lol. You admit it's highly sympathetic to Russia and then base your opinions on it. I just have no words for you, my man. You raise hell about the lying governments in the west, the lying media, don't listen to them, and then pass along russian propaganda. Man it's weird who you give your ear to.
I've asked you to share the sources of your information regarding the outcome of the fighting, but you havn't complied. I shared a source with you telling you in advance that it is pro-Ruussin, so keep in mind it is biased in that direction. But that doesn't mean it is without knowledge of the situation. Your sources are probably biased in the Ukrainian camp, and that should also be considered suspect, although some of it surely is accurate. I generally try to meet the two biases in the middle and assume that is a much closer approximation of the truth. I would say anyone who thinks Ukraine is winning - or has already won! - is deluded by his own propaganda.
 
I've asked you to share the sources of your information regarding the outcome of the fighting, but you havn't complied. I shared a source with you telling you in advance that it is pro-Ruussin, so keep in mind it is biased in that direction. But that doesn't mean it is without knowledge of the situation. Your sources are probably biased in the Ukrainian camp, and that should also be considered suspect, although some of it surely is accurate. I generally try to meet the two biases in the middle and assume that is a much closer approximation of the truth. I would say anyone who thinks Ukraine is winning - or has already won! - is deluded by his own propaganda.
Let's start a thread and I'll tell you what I'm reading and update it. It's mostly tweets though, you have to read tweets. Does that work?
 
That’s why Biden should have stopped it before it ever happened but he didn’t. He sat back did nothing and pushed Putin to invade.
Based on history I can’t blame Putin for not wanting a NATO country on his border. Same way we can not allow Russia and now China in CUBA.
lol what a cult. Did you hear that from the same people that educated you about SARS reports or whatever?

I guess Wilson was weak because he didn't stop the germans or french in WWI.

Roosevelt was weak because the Japanese attacked.

Reagan was weak because they attacked and killed 400 marines.

It's such a stupid point that it would only survive in the cult. I'm gonna go shower now.
 
Let's start a thread and I'll tell you what I'm reading and update it. It's mostly tweets though, you have to read tweets. Does that work?
Sure, get it started. Many places where I get my information are in the form of podcasts. If I read your tweets will you watch my podcasts?
 
Last edited:
lol what a cult. Did you hear that from the same people that educated you about SARS reports or whatever?

I guess Wilson was weak because he didn't stop the germans or french in WWI.

Roosevelt was weak because the Japanese attacked.

Reagan was weak because they attacked and killed 400 marines.

It's such a stupid point that it would only survive in the cult. I'm gonna go shower now.
Wow, why don’t you just say your are historically illiterate?
 
Sure, get it started. Many places where I get my information are in the form of podcasts. If I read your tweets will you watch my podcastes?
If they're from people that actually knows what's going on over there and aren't grinding a political axe, then yes, I'll give them a listen. If they're obvious propaganda from non-experts telling me what to think from a partisan political lens, probably not.
 
Wow, why don’t you just say your are historically illiterate?
Because I'm historically literate and you're in a cult and played too much football without a helmet.
The harder you try, the more adorable you are, btw.
 
I think he's doing better than Ukraine.
Ok before I get wild and have fun with thread I have to spot light this gem. You think a super power that was according to some on par with China, US, Brittian, and France etc is doing better in a war with Ukraine a country that had been conquered by the mother land Russia and been in the USSR? This is the win? So did America come out better then Vietnam?

Russia is being embarrassed so much so China grabbed the leash on Biden bro.

Thanks for the laugh though. Look at the war engineering coming out of Ukraine dude
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT