ADVERTISEMENT

Hey Dan, Why Do You Keep Ignoring This?

2012Bearcat

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
Oct 30, 2010
33,057
51,610
113

You demanded proof before you would ever consider your precious Palestinians could be guilty of the evil vile acts they were accused of. Now you have documented evidence you can't bring yourself to comment on it. How typical.
 

You demanded proof before you would ever consider your precious Palestinians could be guilty of the evil vile acts they were accused of. Now you have documented evidence you can't bring yourself to comment on it. How typical.
I’ve not ignored it out of fear of what it would say. I haven’t read the report and am reluctant to comment until I have. I will say it appears to me the UK-Israel Parliamentary group comes across to me as somewhat the equivalent of AIPAC in America. The Fox report to which you linked has the leader of the organization talking about shedding tears over the atrocities of the Hamas invaders, which is perfectly understandable, but it does not report on his tears over the atrocities of the IDF against their own people during the same conflict. Based on that alone one can’t help but question the objectivity of the investigators. But I will attempt to read the report (Medic linked to it), and will say what I have to say about it after doing so.
 
I’ve not ignored it out of fear of what it would say. I haven’t read the report and am reluctant to comment until I have. I will say it appears to me the UK-Israel Parliamentary group comes across to me as somewhat the equivalent of AIPAC in America. The Fox report to which you linked has the leader of the organization talking about shedding tears over the atrocities of the Hamas invaders, which is perfectly understandable, but it does not report on his tears over the atrocities of the IDF against their own people during the same conflict. Based on that alone one can’t help but question the objectivity of the investigators. But I will attempt to read the report (Medic linked to it), and will say what I have to say about it after doing so.
To busy reading Caitlin and al-jazerra?
 
Oh good grief. Not two paragraphs in this supposedly objective and thorough report says nearly 1200 people were murdered by Hamas and its allies. At least 400 of the 1200 were murdered - incinerated - by the IDF. If the report starts off with such an egregious error what else is in there? Also, I am unaware that anybody denied the attack and murders took place, least of all Hamas. I’ll try and slog through as much of this as I can, but I expect my eyes to glaze over fairly quickly.
 
Okay, I made it through the Report Overview, and I had a few thoughts. First it identifies an extremely coordinated and well planned attack from land, sea and air. Apparently there were about 7000 Palestinian attackers, far more than I had known about. And the attack was brutal, as we all were very aware. One thing that is questionable about the Overview is it repeatedly mentions bodies that were burned, some virtually cremated, and implies they were all burned by the attackers. Not one mention about the IDF utilizing the Hannibal Protocol, not one mention that many if not most of the burned bodies were burned by fire from the IDF. I admit I’ve only read 11 of the 315 pages, but don’t you think it’s a little weird the Overview makes no mention at all that many of the dead Israelis were killed by their own army?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2012Bearcat
Oh good grief. Not two paragraphs in this supposedly objective and thorough report says nearly 1200 people were murdered by Hamas and its allies. At least 400 of the 1200 were murdered - incinerated - by the IDF. If the report starts off with such an egregious error what else is in there? Also, I am unaware that anybody denied the attack and murders took place, least of all Hamas. I’ll try and slog through as much of this as I can, but I expect my eyes to glaze over fairly quickly.

GnamYHiWUAEgpWu
 
  • Like
Reactions: soonerinlOUisiana
I notice you skim right over the rapes.


Here's another breaking story I'm sure you would like to avoid.


Well in the Overview, which I assume you have not bothered to read, very little was said about the rapes and no data was presented beyond saying there is evidence of rape. You guys are really something to behold. Your fixation on the rapes as far more criminal than the murders is something a psychiatrist would find fascinating.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2012Bearcat
Well in the Overview, which I assume you have not bothered to read, very little was said about the rapes and no data was presented beyond saying there is evidence of rape. You guys are really something to behold. Your fixation on the rapes as far more criminal than the murders is something a psychiatrist would find fascinating.
"Your fixation on the rapes as far more criminal than the murders is something a psychiatrist would find fascinating."

You have zero qualifications to make this statement.
 
"Your fixation on the rapes as far more criminal than the murders is something a psychiatrist would find fascinating."

You have zero qualifications to make this statement.
You are correct that I am not a psychiatrist. That being said I do find it fascinating that so many MAGAs are fixated on the rape charges while rendering the murders to the second tier. Sorry if it offends you, dinkem, but I do think a psychiatrist would have a term for the fixation.
 
You are correct that I am not a psychiatrist. That being said I do find it fascinating that so many MAGAs are fixated on the rape charges while rendering the murders to the second tier. Sorry if it offends you, dinkem, but I do think a psychiatrist would have a term for the fixation.
What is a "MAGA"? You cannot ever offend me because I don't have enough respect for you to have that power. Why are you so "fixated" on what you call their "fixation"? Do you prefer rape or murder? You are implying that others are. Isn't that a bit psychotic of you?
 
  • Love
Reactions: 2012Bearcat
What is a "MAGA"? You cannot ever offend me because I don't have enough respect for you to have that power. Why are you so "fixated" on what you call their "fixation"? Do you prefer rape or murder? You are implying that others are. Isn't that a bit psychotic of you?
You’re trying too hard, dinkem. Several MAGA types on this board have been unable to let go of the “systemic rape” hoax spread by Israel following Oct 7. It’s like all the brutal and savage murders by the Hamas thugs just wouldn’t do it for them. They heard the word “rape” and went instantly into unchecked rage to kill every Palestinian on the planet. The murders weren’t enough for them. And here we are a year and a half later and they can’t let go of it as the most horrendous thing that happened to innocent Israelis, even though the concept of “systemic” rape as an ordered weapon of war to the invaders has been debunked. Oh, and let me add I’m not terribly concerned that what I say offends you. I don’t say what I say thinking how glad I’ll be to offend you. You either respect me or you don’t, my life remains essentially unchanged either way.
 
You’re trying too hard, dinkem. Several MAGA types on this board have been unable to let go of the “systemic rape” hoax spread by Israel following Oct 7. It’s like all the brutal and savage murders by the Hamas thugs just wouldn’t do it for them. They heard the word “rape” and went instantly into unchecked rage to kill every Palestinian on the planet. The murders weren’t enough for them. And here we are a year and a half later and they can’t let go of it as the most horrendous thing that happened to innocent Israelis, even though the concept of “systemic” rape as an ordered weapon of war to the invaders has been debunked. Oh, and let me add I’m not terribly concerned that what I say offends you. I don’t say what I say thinking how glad I’ll be to offend you. You either respect me or you don’t, my life remains essentially unchanged either way.
If you do not support Make America Great Again, as an objective, what do you support. I am unapologetically a supporter of this notion. If you don't you either enjoyed the Clinton/Osambo/Biden regimes or you really are cursed with a modest intellect. Which one is it? Or is it both?
 
If you do not support Make America Great Again, as an objective, what do you support. I am unapologetically a supporter of this notion. If you don't you either enjoyed the Clinton/Osambo/Biden regimes or you really are cursed with a modest intellect. Which one is it? Or is it both?
Is there a concept of philosophical anarchism you have trouble understanding? Let me try to clarify. I don’t support one government intervention to correct another government intervention. I support the abolition of all government intervention. What you’re trying too hard to do is put me in one or another government box hoping you can pick it apart in favor of the box you’ve put yourself into. I’m out of all the government boxes. Hope that helps.

Oh, one other thing. You support MAGA as an objective. Can you tell me what the objective is? I assume you want the MAGA ideology to remain the core of our society long after Trump’s third term. Can you say what the ultimate MAGA society looks like in your eyes?
 
Is there a concept of philosophical anarchism you have trouble understanding? Let me try to clarify. I don’t support one government intervention to correct another government intervention. I support the abolition of all government intervention. What you’re trying too hard to do is put me in one or another government box hoping you can pick it apart in favor of the box you’ve put yourself into. I’m out of all the government boxes. Hope that helps.

Oh, one other thing. You support MAGA as an objective. Can you tell me what the objective is? I assume you want the MAGA ideology to remain the core of our society long after Trump’s third term. Can you say what the ultimate MAGA society looks like in your eyes?
Your box is atheist. As a patriot I want our country to be better tomorrow than yesterday or yesteryear. You are not a patriot ergo you cannot process the concept. Your world is hating Jews & championing murder by terrorists. It is your sustenance and are your buckets. Typically those buckets are flushed down the toilet along with their contents. You are a trespasser in this country, service or not. In the service did you only obey the orders you "believed" in or all orders? The ultimate MAGA society would be for you to be on the S. side of the Rio Grande looking north with zero hope.
 
I started reading the report itself, titled Sexual Violence in Conflict. Interestingly in the very first paragraph the report says the investigation was instigated at the request of the Israeli government since there were no UN agencies operating in Israel. It doesn’t say *why* there were no UN agencies, which it seems to me would be relevant, because to my knowledge the Israel government refused to cooperate.
 
Your box is atheist. As a patriot I want our country to be better tomorrow than yesterday or yesteryear. You are not a patriot ergo you cannot process the concept. Your world is hating Jews & championing murder by terrorists. It is your sustenance and are your buckets. Typically those buckets are flushed down the toilet along with their contents. You are a trespasser in this country, service or not. In the service did you only obey the orders you "believed" in or all orders? The ultimate MAGA society would be for you to be on the S. side of the Rio Grande looking north with zero hope.
For a guy who claims to be intelligent you sure say a lot of irrelevant and stupid things.
 
I’m sorry but try as I might I couldn’t keep going. To its credit the report makes it clear it travelled to Israel to get the Israeli version of events. I got through 20 pages, but someone else who is a diehard Zionist should read all 315 pages and point out the relevant proven accusations.
 
You’re trying too hard, dinkem. Several MAGA types on this board have been unable to let go of the “systemic rape” hoax spread by Israel following Oct 7. It’s like all the brutal and savage murders by the Hamas thugs just wouldn’t do it for them. They heard the word “rape” and went instantly into unchecked rage to kill every Palestinian on the planet. The murders weren’t enough for them. And here we are a year and a half later and they can’t let go of it as the most horrendous thing that happened to innocent Israelis, even though the concept of “systemic” rape as an ordered weapon of war to the invaders has been debunked. Oh, and let me add I’m not terribly concerned that what I say offends you. I don’t say what I say thinking how glad I’ll be to offend you. You either respect me or you don’t, my life remains essentially unchanged either way.
I think yer only friend here dan is yer "imaginary" one. Alibaba.
 
I've never claimed to be intelligent, never. If your statement is to be believed you sure seem to be able to understand & process "irrelevant & stupid things" like a pro.
Thank you for confirming my suspicion that you are not as intelligent as you pretend to be. It's usually the lesser intelligent ones whose entire repertoire involves castigating aspersions on someone's character rather than engage in intelligent but spirited conversation. At my age I have become quite adept at recognizing irrelevant and stupid rhetoric. And you, my friend, are a textbook example.
 
You are correct that I am not a psychiatrist. That being said I do find it fascinating that so many MAGAs are fixated on the rape charges while rendering the murders to the second tier. Sorry if it offends you, dinkem, but I do think a psychiatrist would have a term for the fixation.
Not trying to speak for others but I can understand people dying in war, that's kind of the point but rape is an intentional act meant to humiliate and terrorize. Just my opinion. The Palestinians decided to go to war on October 7th and are paying the price for that very poor decision.
 
Not trying to speak for others but I can understand people dying in war, that's kind of the point but rape is an intentional act meant to humiliate and terrorize. Just my opinion. The Palestinians decided to go to war on October 7th and are paying the price for that very poor decision.
There in, is a price to pay.
 
Not trying to speak for others but I can understand people dying in war, that's kind of the point but rape is an intentional act meant to humiliate and terrorize. Just my opinion. The Palestinians decided to go to war on October 7th and are paying the price for that very poor decision.
Indeed it was a catastrophic decision. My only argument about the “systemic rape” charge made by Israel is there is no evidence of it. I know Medic once insisted anything more than one rape is evidence of systemic rape, which on its face is just silly. No one in their right mind would deny there were rapes. I can’t imagine any invasion that ultimately involves up to 7000 attackers on mostly innocent people would be rape-free, as much as we wish it would be. But to claim the attackers were given orders going into the attack to find women and rape them as a weapon of war, which is what Israel was saying, was so preposterous I can’t believe anybody thought it was true. Not to mention it has bern thoroughly debunked. Yet here we are 16 months later still hearing that it happened.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2012Bearcat
Indeed it was a catastrophic decision. My only argument about the “systemic rape” charge made by Israel is there is no evidence of it. I know Medic once insisted anything more than one rape is evidence of systemic rape, which on its face is just silly. No one in their right mind would deny there were rapes. I can’t imagine any invasion that ultimately involves up to 7000 attackers on mostly innocent people would be rape-free, as much as we wish it would be. But to claim the attackers were given orders going into the attack to find women and rape them as a weapon of war, which is what Israel was saying, was so preposterous I can’t believe anybody thought it was true. Not to mention it has bern thoroughly debunked. Yet here we are 16 months later still hearing that it happened.
It's "systematic rape," Dodge. You're clearly as clueless as to what that means as you are about who makes up the Israeli population.
 
Indeed it was a catastrophic decision. My only argument about the “systemic rape” charge made by Israel is there is no evidence of it. I know Medic once insisted anything more than one rape is evidence of systemic rape, which on its face is just silly. No one in their right mind would deny there were rapes. I can’t imagine any invasion that ultimately involves up to 7000 attackers on mostly innocent people would be rape-free, as much as we wish it would be. But to claim the attackers were given orders going into the attack to find women and rape them as a weapon of war, which is what Israel was saying, was so preposterous I can’t believe anybody thought it was true. Not to mention it has bern thoroughly debunked. Yet here we are 16 months later still hearing that it happened.
Debunked by who?
 
It's "systematic rape," Dodge. You're clearly as clueless as to what that means as you are about who makes up the Israeli population.
Maybe you can explain what you mean by “systematic” rape as opposed to the “systemic” kind Israel accused Hamas of.
 
Debunked by who?
The UN delegation charged with investigating the claim until Israel refused to cooperate because they saw their ruse was going to be exposed. They found evidence of sexual abuse, but either none or almost none of rape itself. Interestingly in the recent report by the UK-Israel committee, in the Overview they provided data on weapons used, places where murders took place and the number of murders at those places, but not a single data point giving the number of rapes or where they occurred. It’s probable that the rape numbers and locations are somewhere in the 315 pages, but it is curious they didn’t think to include any of it in the Overview when they supplied lots of murder data there.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2012Bearcat
Indeed it was a catastrophic decision. My only argument about the “systemic rape” charge made by Israel is there is no evidence of it. I know Medic once insisted anything more than one rape is evidence of systemic rape, which on its face is just silly. No one in their right mind would deny there were rapes. I can’t imagine any invasion that ultimately involves up to 7000 attackers on mostly innocent people would be rape-free, as much as we wish it would be. But to claim the attackers were given orders going into the attack to find women and rape them as a weapon of war, which is what Israel was saying, was so preposterous I can’t believe anybody thought it was true. Not to mention it has bern thoroughly debunked. Yet here we are 16 months later still hearing that it happened.
They don't need to be instructed to rape. It is ingrained in all Palestinian males from being weaned. The mullahs teach it from their bastardization of the holy & peaceful Koran. Only you are fooled into submission to their hateful gruel. I ask you again, which do you prefer, murder or rape or are you a super-combo guy?
 
The UN delegation charged with investigating the claim until Israel refused to cooperate because they saw their ruse was going to be exposed. They found evidence of sexual abuse, but either none or almost none of rape itself. Interestingly in the recent report by the UK-Israel committee, in the Overview they provided data on weapons used, places where murders took place and the number of murders at those places, but not a single data point giving the number of rapes or where they occurred. It’s probable that the rape numbers and locations are somewhere in the 315 pages, but it is curious they didn’t think to include any of it in the Overview when they supplied lots of murder data there.
Hey moron, you can easily count murders. How do you "count" rape? Remember the Duke lacrosse biotch?
 
The UN delegation charged with investigating the claim until Israel refused to cooperate because they saw their ruse was going to be exposed. They found evidence of sexual abuse, but either none or almost none of rape itself. Interestingly in the recent report by the UK-Israel committee, in the Overview they provided data on weapons used, places where murders took place and the number of murders at those places, but not a single data point giving the number of rapes or where they occurred. It’s probable that the rape numbers and locations are somewhere in the 315 pages, but it is curious they didn’t think to include any of it in the Overview when they supplied lots of murder data there.
You mean the same UN that issued an arrest warrant for Bibi? LMAO you don't think they have a agenda do you? Jeez it's like you never think for yourself and allow your propaganda outlets to tell you how to think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairdinkem
You mean the same UN that issued an arrest warrant for Bibi? LMAO you don't think they have a agenda do you? Jeez it's like you never think for yourself and allow your propaganda outlets to tell you how to think.
I think it is the ICC that issued charges against Bibi, not the UN.
 
Hey moron, you can easily count murders. How do you "count" rape? Remember the Duke lacrosse biotch?
Really? You can’t count the rapes? How fo you know how many there were? When you know of one do you know of one? What’s the investigation for?
 
You might want to check on that Dan. Who backs the ICC, You get schooled again.
It’s interesting that the US loves it when the ICC issues charges against those we want charged, Putin, but is hopelessly anti-Semitic when it’s one of our own.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT