ADVERTISEMENT

Here's How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole the 2020 Election

i had a buddy who was much more into politics than me tell me play by play exactly how the election would go, the excuses and tactics they would use etc about a month before the election. I of course lovingly told him he was insane. but i stayed up that whole night and watched him be dead on, even down to the shutdown of counting, the overnight vote jump, and the logic being credited all to mail in voters being dems etc. about the only thing he didnt call was arizona being so oddly called that early with so much time left. but yea when they shut it down for the night and i heard the confidence in bidens speech to his crowd i knew it was being massively rigged.

i just cant believe how many refuse to see or dont care about something so important as election fraud, right or left. amazing to me.

I have heard too many liberals say openly they don't care if it was rigged and some even boast about it being done right under our noses. They say well who cares, it got rid of Trump. And I would bet the majority of those hope its done from now on so a Republican never wins POTUS again.
 
I have heard too many liberals say openly they don't care if it was rigged and some even boast about it being done right under our noses. They say well who cares, it got rid of Trump. And I would bet the majority of those hope its done from now on so a Republican never wins POTUS again.
same. absolutely pathetic. theyll love a one party rule of tyranny when they find out how that actually plays out.
 
Yeah um ok.
E1KZwf7WUAE5gV-
 

Here's How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole the 2020 Election​

By Wayne Allyn Root

May 9, 2021

Let me put this in terms even Democrats can understand.
Let's say a white police officer killed a black man who did nothing wrong. Unlike George Floyd, this man had not committed any crime, did not resist arrest, didn't have fentanyl in his system and had no record of violent crime. Assume this poor guy was a law-abiding, taxpaying, churchgoing American and that the cop killed him for the crime of "driving while black."
How do the police react? They say the shooting was righteous. They refuse to investigate. There is bodycam footage, but they refuse to release it. And get this: They refuse to allow anyone to even talk about it. If any cop talks about it, he loses his job. If anyone in the black community talks about it, social media will suspend them or ban them for life.
What would all of that mean to you? Guilty as charged, right? The police must be covering up a crime. No one who's innocent acts like that, right?
Guess what? That's equivalent to the reaction (or, should I say, overreaction) of liberals, Democrats and assorted socialists and communists when Republicans make accusations of massive voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
I thought we're all allowed to have our opinion in America. I thought we have free speech. I thought we have a right to investigate. I thought we have a right to see the videotapes. I thought we have a right to forensic audits.

I was wrong.
The fix is in. It's crystal clear to me now that not only was the election rigged but so is everything post-election. It's simple psychology. Just look at the absurd reaction, or overreaction, by Democrats.
Would anyone dare ban the right to discuss a possibly racist police killing? Can you imagine the reaction by liberals, black activists and the American Civil Liberties Union? What if the Minneapolis police were to permanently ban any discussion of George Floyd's death? What if every black American trying to give his or her opinion on Twitter, Facebook or YouTube were banned for life?
Who would react like that? Only guilty people.
Here are the questions I want answered.
— If Democrats didn't rig and steal the election, why are they so afraid of forensic audits in key battleground states, specifically the current audit in Arizona?
— When Trump was an 8-to-1 landslide favorite with bettors around the world late on election night and clearly headed toward a landslide electoral victory, why did five states suddenly announce they would pause counting for the night? And how come Biden was suddenly ahead by morning?
— How come Michigan apparently had a dump of 149,772 votes at 6:31 a.m. on Nov. 4, 96% of which went to Biden?
— How did Wisconsin count 149,520 votes for Biden from 3:26 to 3:44 a.m. on Nov. 4?
— How come Philadelphia vote counters were so desperate to keep witnesses out of the counting room? Why did they refuse entry to witnesses (to Republicans) until those witnesses had a court order in hand?
— Why were the windows in a vote-counting location in Detroit covered with cardboard so nobody (no Republican) could see inside?
— There are videotapes filmed in Detroit of vans pulling up in the middle of the night with what obviously look like boxes of ballots. In Atlanta, there are videotapes that clearly show ballot containers appearing at a vote-counting location after a fake water main break was used to force all GOP witnesses out of the counting room. Why can't we discuss these videotapes?
— How come Twitter banned me for life over mentioning these videotapes?
— How come the Arizona Senate's liaison for the vote audit says Maricopa County hasn't complied with the subpoena by turning over passwords to Dominion voting machines?
— How come the Biden DOJ suddenly wants to stop the Arizona audit?
These are all valid questions. Why do we get backlash for asking them and posting them on social media? What are Democrats hiding? What are they so afraid of?
In the end, that's the proof Democrats rigged and stole the 2020 presidential election. The truth is in their ridiculous, heavy-handed overreaction. They're desperate to stop you from looking into or even talking about this.
Democrats are guilty as sin.



Valid points......
Hahahaha liz cheney says hi, cancel culture cupcakes. Now you can't acknowledge facts and be in leadership.

What a cult!!!
 

Here's How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole the 2020 Election​

By Wayne Allyn Root

May 9, 2021

Let me put this in terms even Democrats can understand.
Let's say a white police officer killed a black man who did nothing wrong. Unlike George Floyd, this man had not committed any crime, did not resist arrest, didn't have fentanyl in his system and had no record of violent crime. Assume this poor guy was a law-abiding, taxpaying, churchgoing American and that the cop killed him for the crime of "driving while black."
How do the police react? They say the shooting was righteous. They refuse to investigate. There is bodycam footage, but they refuse to release it. And get this: They refuse to allow anyone to even talk about it. If any cop talks about it, he loses his job. If anyone in the black community talks about it, social media will suspend them or ban them for life.
What would all of that mean to you? Guilty as charged, right? The police must be covering up a crime. No one who's innocent acts like that, right?
Guess what? That's equivalent to the reaction (or, should I say, overreaction) of liberals, Democrats and assorted socialists and communists when Republicans make accusations of massive voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
I thought we're all allowed to have our opinion in America. I thought we have free speech. I thought we have a right to investigate. I thought we have a right to see the videotapes. I thought we have a right to forensic audits.

I was wrong.
The fix is in. It's crystal clear to me now that not only was the election rigged but so is everything post-election. It's simple psychology. Just look at the absurd reaction, or overreaction, by Democrats.
Would anyone dare ban the right to discuss a possibly racist police killing? Can you imagine the reaction by liberals, black activists and the American Civil Liberties Union? What if the Minneapolis police were to permanently ban any discussion of George Floyd's death? What if every black American trying to give his or her opinion on Twitter, Facebook or YouTube were banned for life?
Who would react like that? Only guilty people.
Here are the questions I want answered.
— If Democrats didn't rig and steal the election, why are they so afraid of forensic audits in key battleground states, specifically the current audit in Arizona?
— When Trump was an 8-to-1 landslide favorite with bettors around the world late on election night and clearly headed toward a landslide electoral victory, why did five states suddenly announce they would pause counting for the night? And how come Biden was suddenly ahead by morning?
— How come Michigan apparently had a dump of 149,772 votes at 6:31 a.m. on Nov. 4, 96% of which went to Biden?
— How did Wisconsin count 149,520 votes for Biden from 3:26 to 3:44 a.m. on Nov. 4?
— How come Philadelphia vote counters were so desperate to keep witnesses out of the counting room? Why did they refuse entry to witnesses (to Republicans) until those witnesses had a court order in hand?
— Why were the windows in a vote-counting location in Detroit covered with cardboard so nobody (no Republican) could see inside?
— There are videotapes filmed in Detroit of vans pulling up in the middle of the night with what obviously look like boxes of ballots. In Atlanta, there are videotapes that clearly show ballot containers appearing at a vote-counting location after a fake water main break was used to force all GOP witnesses out of the counting room. Why can't we discuss these videotapes?
— How come Twitter banned me for life over mentioning these videotapes?
— How come the Arizona Senate's liaison for the vote audit says Maricopa County hasn't complied with the subpoena by turning over passwords to Dominion voting machines?
— How come the Biden DOJ suddenly wants to stop the Arizona audit?
These are all valid questions. Why do we get backlash for asking them and posting them on social media? What are Democrats hiding? What are they so afraid of?
In the end, that's the proof Democrats rigged and stole the 2020 presidential election. The truth is in their ridiculous, heavy-handed overreaction. They're desperate to stop you from looking into or even talking about this.
Democrats are guilty as sin.



Valid points......
Except 70 lawsuits were thrown out by CONSERVATIVE JUDGES, recounts found no widespread changes why? BECAUSE ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING IS ACCURATE! THE SUPREME COURT WITH A SIX TO THREE CONSERVATIVE majority threw out Trump challenges with NO MERIT! And all fifty states certified their votes despite threats from wingnuts buying the BIG LIE! That’s a whole lot of people all over the country speaking fact in response to pure fiction. Finally, you can’t fix stupid, gullible, and those who refuse to live in reality following a habitual liar that tries to tell people what his reality is because he and they don’t like to lose which they did by over 7 million votes and an overwhelming electoral college vote.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CoastGuardCowboy
Except 70 lawsuits were thrown out by CONSERVATIVE JUDGES, recounts found no widespread changes why? BECAUSE ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING IS ACCURATE! THE SUPREME COURT WITH A SIX TO THREE CONSERVATIVE majority threw out Trump challenges with NO MERIT! And all fifty states certified their votes despite threats from wingnuts buying the BIG LIE! That’s a whole lot of people all over the country speaking fact in response to pure fiction. Finally, you can’t fix stupid, gullible, and those who refuse to live in reality following a habitual liar that tries to tell people what his reality is because he and they don’t like to lose which they did by over 7 million votes and an overwhelming electoral college vote.

Then why the big fight against audits and recounts? If it is THE BIG LIE, why not go full monty and embarrass all 70+ million voters and Trump. The libcomdems should be thrilled to get that opportunity...but yet obfuscation, lies and duplicity rein. You have an explanation for that?
 
Then why the big fight against audits and recounts? If it is THE BIG LIE, why not go full monty and embarrass all 70+ million voters and Trump. The libcomdems should be thrilled to get that opportunity...but yet obfuscation, lies and duplicity rein. You have an explanation for that?
Because the election IS OVER complete, the winner decided, election certified by ALL FIFTY STATES, the President inaugurated and leading the government. THAT IS REALITY!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CoastGuardCowboy
Except 70 lawsuits were thrown out by CONSERVATIVE JUDGES, recounts found no widespread changes why? BECAUSE ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING IS ACCURATE! THE SUPREME COURT WITH A SIX TO THREE CONSERVATIVE majority threw out Trump challenges with NO MERIT! And all fifty states certified their votes despite threats from wingnuts buying the BIG LIE! That’s a whole lot of people all over the country speaking fact in response to pure fiction. Finally, you can’t fix stupid, gullible, and those who refuse to live in reality following a habitual liar that tries to tell people what his reality is because he and they don’t like to lose which they did by over 7 million votes and an overwhelming electoral college vote.
As a former auditor, the system of internal controls is paramount to the overall opinion issued on financial statements. If controls are weak, how can you place confidence in the numbers? CPA's don't.

IMO, that should be the focus in this country. I have no idea if widespread cheating was involved, and sure electronic machines are accurate, but garbage in means garbage out.

When no ID is required to vote, when no signature is required to vote, no comparison of signatures, no signed notarized affidavit required on a mailed in ballot, etc... That is a system of no internal controls and that system can lead to fraud. There is not a CPA firm in the country that would certify the results of the past election with no internal controls as to eligibility to vote in many parts of the country.

The country needs to move on from the past election, you want faith in democracy restored? You have to fix the lack of internal controls that exist in the voting methodology in some states. This is an example of the Reps IMO of needing to pivot and put the focus on solving a problem moving forward. And let's be frank, if the Dims do not want proper internal controls over voting methods? There can be only one reason, and hiding behind BS racial and demographical BS is an insult to people with common sense and those educated on how to produce accurate data collection and have systems of internal controls in place to prevent as much fraud as possible. No system of internal control can prevent collusion and fraud, but allowing the possibility of someone who is not eligible to vote to vote? That is a poor system from the get go.
 
Last edited:
First enjoy gas lines; soup lines to follow
Laughable you think a cyber attack and trucker shortage was caused by Biden. One was directed by enemies of the state and the other was caused by piss poor wages and poor working conditions.

Plus the good ole boys in the fossil fuel business aren’t ready to transition too quickly to clean energy and apparently effective cyber security! So they wish to make a political statement to some degree too until they’re swimming in their oil.

If we have a market economy the price will stabilize when the trucker shortage is fixed and the computer issues for pipelines are secured. If it’s manipulated like I believe, the oil and gas fit may continue until Biden has to get them in line by releasing strategic supplies to raise supply to lower prices.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CoastGuardCowboy
As a former auditor, the system of internal controls is paramount to the overall opinion issued on financial statements. If controls are weak, how can you place confidence in the numbers? CPA's don't.

IMO, that should be the focus in this country. I have no idea if widespread cheating was involved, and sure electronic machines are accurate, but garbage in means garbage out.

When no ID is required to vote, when no signature is required to vote, no comparison of signatures, no signed notarized affidavit required on a mailed in ballot, etc... That is a system of no internal controls and that system can lead to fraud. There is not a CPA firm in the country that would certify the results of the past election with no internal controls as to eligibility to vote in many parts of the country.

The country needs to move on from the past election, you want faith in democracy restored? You have to fix the lack of internal controls that exist in the voting methodology in some states. This is an example of the Reps IMO of needing to pivot and put the focus on solving a problem moving forward. And let's be frank, if the Dims do not want proper internal controls over voting methods? There can be only one reason, and hiding behind BS racial and demographical BS is an insult to people with common sense and those educated on how to produce accurate data collection and have systems of internal controls in place to prevent as much fraud as possible. No system of internal control can prevent collusion and fraud, but allowing the possibility of someone who is not eligible to vote to vote? That is a poor system from the get go.
Disagree- fix the last election or live with the global left running our country into the ground.
Does anyone think we make it to 2022 - much less 2024? Look what they've done in a few months.

Sit back and let them get away with it? I vote no way in Haites
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirk4177
Disagree- fix the last election or live with the global left running our country into the ground.
Does anyone think we make it to 2022 - much less 2024? Look what they've done in a few months.

Sit back and let them get away with it? I vote no way in Haites
And yet in four years your life will change very little like mine didn’t change much under Trump. That’s the genius of a representative democracy. It’s messy, argumentative, and maddening when you disagree with policy or those enacting it but it works because we’re stronger as one nation that keeps an eye on each other all the while understanding elections come around where needed change can take place if the majority believes it should. That’s what happened in November 2020.
 
And yet in four years your life will change very little like mine didn’t change much under Trump. That’s the genius of a representative democracy. It’s messy, argumentative, and maddening when you disagree with policy or those enacting it but it works because we’re stronger as one nation that keeps an eye on each other all the while understanding elections come around where needed change can take place if the majority believes it should. That’s what happened in November 2020.
Representative Republic
 
Then why the big fight against audits and recounts? If it is THE BIG LIE, why not go full monty and embarrass all 70+ million voters and Trump. The libcomdems should be thrilled to get that opportunity...but yet obfuscation, lies and duplicity rein. You have an explanation for that?
The Democrats have a golden chance to make fools of windriverrange and me. Join us in demanding forensic audits. But the Democrats absolutely refuse. Not all Democrats are as stupid as some would have us believe. Some Democrats know this election was rigged.
 
Because the election IS OVER complete, the winner decided, election certified by ALL FIFTY STATES, the President inaugurated and leading the government. THAT IS REALITY!
Don't you really mean only when Democrats are declared the winner of the election? Seems we just went through 4 years of Democrats questioning the 2016.
 
The Democrats have a golden chance to make fools of windriverrange and me. Join us in demanding forensic audits. But the Democrats absolutely refuse. Not all Democrats are as stupid as some would have us believe. Some Democrats know this election was rigged.

Don't you really mean only when Democrats are declared the winner of the election? Seems we just went through 4 years of Democrats questioning the 2016.

When the left loses they throw tantrums and have sham investigations. But they want unity.

1-64
 
Mark Levin is a leading constitutional lawyer. He detailed for me me how the election was rigged in small words using the dominant West Germanic language. He wasn't hard to understand. I got it as almost all of us here did.

A glaring part of the mechanics of which we all must accept? There are the slow among us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
LOL who says this? Levin?

He's a moron.
Levin is an iconoclast and an ideologue, but he’s not a moron. Which I’m sure you already know. So it surprises me when you say things like that. If your intention is to persuade anyone to your point of view that is hardly the correct approach. But you aren’t attempting to persuade, are you? You’re just here to insult people with whom you disagree and stir the pot. I wonder what category psychologists would put your mindset in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: osuintx
Levin is an iconoclast and an ideologue, but he’s not a moron. Which I’m sure you already know. So it surprises me when you say things like that. If your intention is to persuade anyone to your point of view that is hardly the correct approach. But you aren’t attempting to persuade, are you? You’re just here to insult people with whom you disagree and stir the pot. I wonder what category psychologists would put your mindset in.
Probably an anarchist.
 
Levin would score higher than you in intelligence quotient testing. Much higher. I have a series of questions.....
Levin's a moron. I've listened to him, and he's a slanted, disingenuous, demagogue that like all those right winger talking heads, never has anybody on that is equipped to confront his gaslighting.
 
Levin's a moron. I've listened to him, and he's a slanted, disingenuous, demagogue that like all those right winger talking heads, never has anybody on that is equipped to confront his gaslighting.
Thank you for proving my point. We can always count on you. Do you have any idea what a demagogue is? Do you have any idea what a moron is?
 
Don't you really mean only when Democrats are declared the winner of the election? Seems we just went through 4 years of Democrats questioning the 2016.
So tit for tat? How many lawsuits, recounts, and insurrection attempts did Democrats try?
 
So tit for tat? How many lawsuits, recounts, and insurrection attempts did Democrats try?
Are you downplaying antifa and BLM role in the Jan 6? BC there's many many videos that show patriots pulling POS people from your side away from the windows, and corrupt DC cops (you know the ones that shot the u armed veteran girl Without warning) Letting people in. Most of the people they met in stayed between the ropes inside when no one was there monitoring .

Keep throwing that word "insurrection" out there when you don't know a damn thing about it
 
  • Like
Reactions: OUSOONER67
Thank you for proving my point. We can always count on you. Do you have any idea what a demagogue is? Do you have any idea what a moron is?

Well, yeah. That's just gibberish, Sunny.

Are you downplaying antifa and BLM role in the Jan 6? BC there's many many videos that show patriots pulling POS people from your side away from the windows, and corrupt DC cops (you know the ones that shot the u armed veteran girl Without warning) Letting people in. Most of the people they met in stayed between the ropes inside when no one was there monitoring .

Keep throwing that word "insurrection" out there when you don't know a damn thing about it

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA if your ideology shits down both legs and hosts a failed insurrection, about all you can do is lie and try to say it was someone else.

How many antifa or BLM people have been charged? Any? Cuz there's a lot of evidence and charges with these MAGA terrorists. Some guy changed his plea just today and decided he'd plead guilty.

Check out all the confession porn of these nitwits that got arrested. "I was just doing what the President said." My fave: "I was brainwashed by fox." We really are dealing with the dumbest slice of the electorate -- they were talked into a riot and trying to kill people.
 
Are you downplaying antifa and BLM role in the Jan 6? BC there's many many videos that show patriots pulling POS people from your side away from the windows, and corrupt DC cops (you know the ones that shot the u armed veteran girl Without warning) Letting people in. Most of the people they met in stayed between the ropes inside when no one was there monitoring .

Keep throwing that word "insurrection" out there when you don't know a damn thing about it
Oh we know it when we see it and your side did it and you know it! Your people attacked the Capitol and six deaths resulted trying to overthrow the election certified by all fifty states. Anti-American insurrectionists is a perfect description of that mob of people causing violence, destruction, and injury to people trying to protect the building and Congress. They need to rot in prison as far as I’m concerned.
 
Lolz. You need to push hard for this. I mean really hard.
Yep run on complete fiction like dumbass’s competence to lead anybody anywhere productive. He lost the popular vote by 3 mil the first time, 7 mil plus the second time, heck, run him again and let’s see if we can beat him by 10 mil plus for strike three!!!! SMDH🤦
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Yep run on complete fiction like dumbass’s competence to lead anybody anywhere productive. He lost the popular vote by 3 mil the first time, 7 mil plus the second time, heck, run him again and let’s see if we can beat him by 10 mil plus for strike three!!!! SMDH🤦

What's crazy is how unpopular he is, he's never expanded his base, he plainly lost everything he could lose after '16, and they still think he's something special.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Oh we know it when we see it and your side did it and you know it! Your people attacked the Capitol and six deaths resulted trying to overthrow the election certified by all fifty states. Anti-American insurrectionists is a perfect description of that mob of people causing violence, destruction, and injury to people trying to protect the building and Congress. They need to rot in prison as far as I’m concerned.
What 6? I heard of 1 death and it was one of your “insurrectionists”. The left media as usual spat on the grave of Brian sicknick by using him for political points in a completely fabricated lie. The other three were people at the rally who died of natural causes and were not at the capitol building. Also used by the media with zero shame. Not sure who else I’m missing but if you’re a regular leftist media reader you may want to make a habit of scouring months old articles to see where they’ve retracted all the lies they previously told. You have to be well trained, they don’t bother to announce it, they just conveniently go back and retract it without an apology
 
Yep run on complete fiction like dumbass’s competence to lead anybody anywhere productive. He lost the popular vote by 3 mil the first time, 7 mil plus the second time, heck, run him again and let’s see if we can beat him by 10 mil plus for strike three!!!! SMDH🤦
Maybe while you’re at it you can fabricate a farce of a story to impeach him again for political theatre. You’re down 2-0 in that count though
 
So tit for tat? How many lawsuits, recounts, and insurrection attempts did Democrats try?
I would interject a couple of points.

1). I seem to remember the Democrats begging voters at the Electoral College to vote against the wishes of the people they represented in 2016. I don’t know that that could be called an insurrection, but:

2). While the lawsuits may have been annoying to you every one of them was entered into legally, which could hardly be described as an insurrection.

It is interesting that you consider the riot of January 6 to be an insurrection because it was an attempt to alter the results of the election. As to your question of how many insurrections did the Democrats impose after 2016 I would answer there was one, a $30+ million dollar Mueller investigation that lasted as front page news for 2 1/2 - 3 years. The so called January 6 insurrection has become mostly a memory already.

I understand your desire to win this debate supersedes all other factors, but it does your side no good to stretch the truth beyond all credibility.
 
I would interject a couple of points.

1). I seem to remember the Democrats begging voters at the Electoral College to vote against the wishes of the people they represented in 2016. I don’t know that that could be called an insurrection, but:

2). While the lawsuits may have been annoying to you every one of them was entered into legally, which could hardly be described as an insurrection.

It is interesting that you consider the riot of January 6 to be an insurrection because it was an attempt to alter the results of the election. As to your question of how many insurrections did the Democrats impose after 2016 I would answer there was one, a $30+ million dollar Mueller investigation that lasted as front page news for 2 1/2 - 3 years. The so called January 6 insurrection has become mostly a memory already.

I understand your desire to win this debate supersedes all other factors, but it does your side no good to stretch the truth beyond all credibility.
I might add that I know I’m the only one on this board that feels this way, maybe the only one in America, but I LOVED the riot/insurrection of January 6th. It tickled me no end to envision those weasely politicians hiding under their desks in fear for their lives. For way too long they have smugly sat in their marbled halls of power issuing edicts that affect their constituents like the serfs they assumed they were, not giving a fig with any unintended consequences, secure in the belief that the people had been successfully pacified. It must have felt like a Mike Tyson body blow to realize maybe we aren’t quite as intimidated as they thought.

And their reaction tells us all we need to know about them. Did they look in the mirror and say to themselves “maybe we got a little too full of ourselves, maybe we ought to back off?” No, of course not, they reacted the way any tyrant reacts by creating an even stronger police state. Anybody paying any attention can no longer deny it: they don’t give a damn about anything but brute power. The aftermath of January 6 is visible proof.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT