Has a crime been committed?

[wyomingosualum]

How many angels can dance on the head of pin? Let me know when you got some of them suckers in a jar and I can give you an answer. Unknowable hypotheticals are generally unknowable.

OK, seems like you’re ducking the issue when the hypothetical is clearly laid out. I’ll give you my thoughts. Seems to me like the highly revered Eff Bee Eye has committed the crime of accessory after the fact. In the hypothetical, they know a crime has been committed and they sit on it, hoping nobody will notice.

Here is the federal statute:

“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.”

Any thoughts?

 

[davidallen]

OK, seems like you’re ducking the issue when the hypothetical is clearly laid out. I’ll give you my thoughts. Seems to me like the highly revered Eff Bee Eye has committed the crime of accessory after the fact. In the hypothetical, they know a crime has been committed and they sit on it, hoping nobody will notice.

Here is the federal statute:

“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.”

Any thoughts?

If the FBI committed a crime then they committed a crime. If they didn't then they didn't. Does that help?

Your hypothetical has so many unknowable, unspecified aspects it seems kinda silly to discuss. Could be just me I guess.

 

[SquatchinPoke]

OK, seems like you’re ducking the issue when the hypothetical is clearly laid out. I’ll give you my thoughts. Seems to me like the highly revered Eff Bee Eye has committed the crime of accessory after the fact. In the hypothetical, they know a crime has been committed and they sit on it, hoping nobody will notice.

Here is the federal statute:

“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.”

Any thoughts?

IMO

Remember the J6 trails boys

 

[LAY THE WOODY]

If the FBI committed a crime then they committed a crime. If they didn't then they didn't. Does that help?

Your hypothetical has so many unknowable, unspecified aspects it seems kinda silly to discuss. Could be just me I guess.

Yes yer the silly one. 😂

 

[wyomingosualum]

If the FBI committed a crime then they committed a crime. If they didn't then they didn't. Does that help?

Your hypothetical has so many unknowable, unspecified aspects it seems kinda silly to discuss. Could be just me I guess.

It’s just you. But I still like you.

 

[davidallen]

It’s just you.

It usually is. That isn't always a bad thing.

But I still like you.

And I appreciate you!

 

[2012Bearcat]

Did that happen? Didn't he just enter into a plea agreement on those charges?

Are we just talking what ifs or is there something real to discuss?

Come on Dave you are not fooling anyone here. Only Clintard could be this dumb.

 

[Syskatine]

It’s just you. But I still like you.

It usually is. That isn't always a bad thing.

And I appreciate you!

Gross. You two get a room or something, my gawd.

Come on Dave you are not fooling anyone here. Only Clintard could be this dumb.

LOL this is better than the "BUT HER EMAILS!!"

 

[davidallen]

Come on Dave you are not fooling anyone here. Only Clintard could be this dumb.

You got anything? At all? Which alleged crimes have the SOL expired on?

 

[2012Bearcat]

You got anything? At all? Which alleged crimes have the SOL expired on?

Yet you continue on. Maybe I'm wrong, you and Clintard are on the same level.

 

[Syskatine]

You got anything? At all? Which alleged crimes have the SOL expired on?

 

[2012Bearcat]

LMAO when you have your head stuck up your backside you can't see anything. Be sure to pull your head out tomorrow, the hearings should be both informative and embarrassing for you. At the bare minimum they should be entertaining.

 

[Ponca Dan]

If the FBI committed a crime then they committed a crime. If they didn't then they didn't. Does that help?

Your hypothetical has so many unknowable, unspecified aspects it seems kinda silly to discuss. Could be just me I guess.

Well, after this we know there is at least one overweight man that can dance on the head of a pin.

 

[wyomingosualum]

The New York Post published an article in which it alleged that evidence of over 400 crimes are found on the laptop. i haven’t independently verified any of this, so who knows.

But pick any crime, outside of rape or murder, and it will have an expiration date. So I’m going with tax evasion and bribery and extortion. 10% for the Big Guy, the strong arm move to China (my father and I are waiting) are on that laptop, I believe.

 

[2012Bearcat]

The New York Post published an article in which it alleged that evidence of over 400 crimes are found on the laptop. i haven’t independently verified any of this, so who knows.

But pick any crime, outside of rape or murder, and it will have an expiration date. So I’m going with tax evasion and bribery and extortion. 10% for the Big Guy, the strong arm move to China (my father and I are waiting) are on that laptop, I believe.

Isn't it funny, the same people that cried Russian Collusion and Trump is a Russian asset for the last 7 years are the same ones demanding exact crimes the Bidens are guilty of. You really can't make it up and have it be more hypocritical.

 

[davidallen]

The New York Post published an article in which it alleged that evidence of over 400 crimes are found on the laptop. i haven’t independently verified any of this, so who knows.

But pick any crime, outside of rape or murder, and it will have an expiration date. So I’m going with tax evasion and bribery and extortion. 10% for the Big Guy, the strong arm move to China (my father and I are waiting) are on that laptop, I believe.

The SOL expired on those allegations? I am sure the Bidens are breathing a big sigh of relief...

 

[davidallen]

Isn't it funny, the same people that cried Russian Collusion and Trump is a Russian asset for the last 7 years are the same ones demanding exact crimes the Bidens are guilty of. You really can't make it up and have it be more hypocritical.

Bruh, you said that the SOL had expired. I presume that was on something specific. Was that just more BCBS™?

 

[wyomingosualum]

The SOL expired on those allegations? I am sure the Bidens are breathing a big sigh of relief...

You‘re reaching beyond the original scope of the thread. But yeah, sit on something long enough and it’ll happen.

I don’t recall a case with this type of potential before. I think it’s an interesting scenario.

 

[Ponca Dan]

You‘re reaching beyond the original scope of the thread. But yeah, sit on something long enough and it’ll happen.

I don’t recall a case with this type of potential before. I think it’s an interesting scenario.

It is very important to @davidallen that he convince you that you’re being silly, there’s nothing to see. If there is something to see all his “look at Trump the criminal” repertoire instantly flies out the window, leaving him with nothing to infuriate the MAGA’s. He’d probably have to quit the board in humiliation.

 

[davidallen]

...
I don’t recall a case with this type of potential before. I think it’s an interesting scenario.

Nor do I. Certainly nothing seems to fit the bill as it relates to HB. #amirite @2012BCBS™ ?