ADVERTISEMENT

Guess the State: Democrat-Run Fiasco Edition

OKSTATE1

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
45,121
56,352
113
Edmond, Oklahoma
January 28, 2020
Guess the State: Democrat-Run Fiasco Edition
By Charles W. Sullivan

The last time Republicans held a majority on this state's Supreme Court was in the 1920s. Its Court of Appeals has never had a Republican majority.

The last time Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state Legislature at the same time was 1930. In the 89 years from 1931 to the present, Democrats have held a majority of both houses of the state Legislature for 79 of the 89 years.

Since 1931, Democrats have held the governor's office for 69 of the 89 years. Even when a Republican has been governor, his powers have been greatly limited because he has never held a majority in both houses of the state legislature while in office.

What state am I?

If you guessed CA, IL, NY, NJ, or MA, you're wrong. If you guessed NM, go to the head of the class (here) (here). Since 1931, no other state has had single-party Dem rule at the state level as long as New Mexico. And how has New Mexico fared under the stewardship of single party Democrat rule? As we shall see, not so well.

EDUCATION: By all accounts, New Mexico has one of the worst, if not the worst, K–12 public education system in the country. It is a system that spends vast sums of money but has little or no accountability for the students, teachers, administrators, parents, or elected officials. Here are the sobering stats. It has recently been rated as the worst state public school system in the country. Among the country's 11,850 school districts, only one from New Mexico, Los Alamos, is rated in the top 1,000. A charity named the New Mexico Coalition for Literacy estimates that an astonishing 46% of the adults in the state are functional illiterates.

Sadly, the state university system is little better. It is an example of quantity over quality. Despite its small population of 2.1 million, New Mexico has a staggering seven state-funded colleges and universities that grant four-year degrees. In contrast, neighboring Arizona with a population of 7.3 million has three. Not a single college or university in New Mexico is ranked in the nation's top 500.

CRIME: New Mexico is a dangerous place to live, and a lot of judges are reluctant to lock up criminals. It is #1 in the country for per capita property crime and #2 for violent crime. Albuquerque, by far the state's largest city, has the dubious distinction of a #1 ranking for auto thefts in the entire nation. Don't expect the Chamber of Commerce or the Department of Tourism to brag about the fact that Albuquerque is ranked as the 12th most dangerous city in the U.S. Expect Albuquerque to move up on the list, as it just had a record number of homicides in 2019.

JOBS/ECONOMY: New Mexico survives financially because it receives enormous sums of money from two sources: the federal government and the oil and natural gas industry. The federal government has spent a gigantic amount of money in the state since the 1940s, with the development of the bomb and all the defense spending that came afterwards. The state also receives millions of dollars each year from oil and gas revenues, especially from leases of state land. With the fracking revolution going on in the Permian Basin in southeast New Mexico, the state is swimming in tax revenues and has a large budget surplus.

Despite all the mentioned revenue and the production bonanza in the Permian Basin, New Mexico has one of the worst job markets in the country. It has the fourth highest unemployment rate of any state. It's the second hardest state in the country in which to find full-time employment. As one would expect of a state that has had single-party Dem rule for nearly 90 years, the state is teeming with public-sector employees and has the third highest percentage of public-sector workers in the country. The national average for public sector workers is 15.1%, while New Mexico has 22.2%. In other words, New Mexico has 47% more public sector workers than the national average. Not surprisingly, New Mexico is more dependent on federal spending than any other state and receives more in per capita federal spending than all but two states.

POVERTY: Poverty among adults is usually associated with low education levels, and poverty among children is usually associated with being raised in a single-parent home. New Mexico has lots of both. As of November 2019, New Mexico had 827,269 persons receiving Medicaid, or 39% of the population and 223,116 persons receiving SNAP benefits, or 11% of the state's population. Despite the enormous amount of federal spending, oil and natural gas riches, and some of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world, New Mexico is considered to be the third poorest state in the nation.

DEATH SPIRAL: Several years ago, Forbes Magazine identified New Mexico as the #1 death spiral state in the country. New Mexico, with its vast public-sector work force, is on the hook for billions of dollars in defined benefit pension plan payments to retiring public employees. These defined benefit plans are so generous that private-sector businesses can no longer afford them and now offer 401(k) (defined contribution) plans instead. The public plans are woefully underfunded primarily because they assumed an unreasonably high expected annual rate of return of 7% to 8%. Assuming such high expected rates of return permitted pols to reduce annual contributions to the plans. Now, in addition to insufficient past contributions, there are not enough taxpayers to make up the funding shortfalls. New Mexico has a whopping 148 public-sector pension-takers for every 100 private-sector job-holders in the state. This is the largest imbalance of any state in the country and clearly unsustainable for the taxpayer.

STAGNATION: New Mexico and Arizona share much history. The New Mexico Territory became part of the United States after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. During the Civil War, the territory was divided into the New Mexico and Arizona Territories. As recently as 1930, Arizona's population was just 12,000 larger than New Mexico's (435,000 vs 423,000). But today, Arizona's population is more than five million larger than New Mexico (7.3 million vs 2.1 million). Why did New Mexico, with its vast oil and natural gas wealth, experience such anemic population growth compared to Arizona?

In most parts of the country, population growth follows job growth. The most plausible explanation of what has happened is that 90 years of single-party Dem rule in New Mexico has created a state that is deemed business-unfriendly. When the private businesses did not come, neither did the people.

The state nickname for New Mexico is the Land of Enchantment. Sadly, after 90 years of single-party Democrat rule, it should probably be changed to the Land of Disenchantment.
 
January 28, 2020
Guess the State: Democrat-Run Fiasco Edition
By Charles W. Sullivan

The last time Republicans held a majority on this state's Supreme Court was in the 1920s. Its Court of Appeals has never had a Republican majority.

The last time Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state Legislature at the same time was 1930. In the 89 years from 1931 to the present, Democrats have held a majority of both houses of the state Legislature for 79 of the 89 years.

Since 1931, Democrats have held the governor's office for 69 of the 89 years. Even when a Republican has been governor, his powers have been greatly limited because he has never held a majority in both houses of the state legislature while in office.

What state am I?

If you guessed CA, IL, NY, NJ, or MA, you're wrong. If you guessed NM, go to the head of the class (here) (here). Since 1931, no other state has had single-party Dem rule at the state level as long as New Mexico. And how has New Mexico fared under the stewardship of single party Democrat rule? As we shall see, not so well.

EDUCATION: By all accounts, New Mexico has one of the worst, if not the worst, K–12 public education system in the country. It is a system that spends vast sums of money but has little or no accountability for the students, teachers, administrators, parents, or elected officials. Here are the sobering stats. It has recently been rated as the worst state public school system in the country. Among the country's 11,850 school districts, only one from New Mexico, Los Alamos, is rated in the top 1,000. A charity named the New Mexico Coalition for Literacy estimates that an astonishing 46% of the adults in the state are functional illiterates.

Sadly, the state university system is little better. It is an example of quantity over quality. Despite its small population of 2.1 million, New Mexico has a staggering seven state-funded colleges and universities that grant four-year degrees. In contrast, neighboring Arizona with a population of 7.3 million has three. Not a single college or university in New Mexico is ranked in the nation's top 500.

CRIME: New Mexico is a dangerous place to live, and a lot of judges are reluctant to lock up criminals. It is #1 in the country for per capita property crime and #2 for violent crime. Albuquerque, by far the state's largest city, has the dubious distinction of a #1 ranking for auto thefts in the entire nation. Don't expect the Chamber of Commerce or the Department of Tourism to brag about the fact that Albuquerque is ranked as the 12th most dangerous city in the U.S. Expect Albuquerque to move up on the list, as it just had a record number of homicides in 2019.

JOBS/ECONOMY: New Mexico survives financially because it receives enormous sums of money from two sources: the federal government and the oil and natural gas industry. The federal government has spent a gigantic amount of money in the state since the 1940s, with the development of the bomb and all the defense spending that came afterwards. The state also receives millions of dollars each year from oil and gas revenues, especially from leases of state land. With the fracking revolution going on in the Permian Basin in southeast New Mexico, the state is swimming in tax revenues and has a large budget surplus.

Despite all the mentioned revenue and the production bonanza in the Permian Basin, New Mexico has one of the worst job markets in the country. It has the fourth highest unemployment rate of any state. It's the second hardest state in the country in which to find full-time employment. As one would expect of a state that has had single-party Dem rule for nearly 90 years, the state is teeming with public-sector employees and has the third highest percentage of public-sector workers in the country. The national average for public sector workers is 15.1%, while New Mexico has 22.2%. In other words, New Mexico has 47% more public sector workers than the national average. Not surprisingly, New Mexico is more dependent on federal spending than any other state and receives more in per capita federal spending than all but two states.

POVERTY: Poverty among adults is usually associated with low education levels, and poverty among children is usually associated with being raised in a single-parent home. New Mexico has lots of both. As of November 2019, New Mexico had 827,269 persons receiving Medicaid, or 39% of the population and 223,116 persons receiving SNAP benefits, or 11% of the state's population. Despite the enormous amount of federal spending, oil and natural gas riches, and some of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world, New Mexico is considered to be the third poorest state in the nation.

DEATH SPIRAL: Several years ago, Forbes Magazine identified New Mexico as the #1 death spiral state in the country. New Mexico, with its vast public-sector work force, is on the hook for billions of dollars in defined benefit pension plan payments to retiring public employees. These defined benefit plans are so generous that private-sector businesses can no longer afford them and now offer 401(k) (defined contribution) plans instead. The public plans are woefully underfunded primarily because they assumed an unreasonably high expected annual rate of return of 7% to 8%. Assuming such high expected rates of return permitted pols to reduce annual contributions to the plans. Now, in addition to insufficient past contributions, there are not enough taxpayers to make up the funding shortfalls. New Mexico has a whopping 148 public-sector pension-takers for every 100 private-sector job-holders in the state. This is the largest imbalance of any state in the country and clearly unsustainable for the taxpayer.

STAGNATION: New Mexico and Arizona share much history. The New Mexico Territory became part of the United States after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. During the Civil War, the territory was divided into the New Mexico and Arizona Territories. As recently as 1930, Arizona's population was just 12,000 larger than New Mexico's (435,000 vs 423,000). But today, Arizona's population is more than five million larger than New Mexico (7.3 million vs 2.1 million). Why did New Mexico, with its vast oil and natural gas wealth, experience such anemic population growth compared to Arizona?

In most parts of the country, population growth follows job growth. The most plausible explanation of what has happened is that 90 years of single-party Dem rule in New Mexico has created a state that is deemed business-unfriendly. When the private businesses did not come, neither did the people.

The state nickname for New Mexico is the Land of Enchantment. Sadly, after 90 years of single-party Democrat rule, it should probably be changed to the Land of Disenchantment.
Glass Houses and whatnot.

State education ranking...

New Mexico #41
Oklahoma #42

Remind me who controls Oklahoma politics again?
 
"A" for effort on deflecting away from the many, many points in the article.
Oh wait, here is another little fun factoid... per capita the under funded public pension obligations in Oklahoma are 12% higher in Oklahoma than New Mexico.

Remind me who controls Oklahoma politics again?
 
Need a ruling @CowboyJD - does this qualify as an "own goal"?

I am a YUGE EPL fan that BIGLY hates VAR....

So don’t try to make me a VAR official.

I am as fücked (thanks to @MegaPoke for the “umlaut loophole”) up as the rest of you idiots.

#LFC #YNWA

P.S. I will always rule in favor of a fellow Poke over a goon regardless of political affiliation, but this is two brothers in orange....for future reference.

P.P.S. Can’t rule it an own goal.....but it is a least a yellow card.
 
buttspray.gif
 
I was visiting the Navajo brothers with their 65 percent unemployment rate north of Gallup when the Democrat bus came. A pack of cigarettes and a free bus ride to the polls. I was invited. I told the well dressed chaperone I was registered to vote in Texas. He told me I think we can fix that.

I never traded with some of the gorgeous Navajo street walkers. I thought about it.
 
Glass Houses and whatnot.

State education ranking...

New Mexico #41
Oklahoma #42

Remind me who controls Oklahoma politics again?
Republicans took control of the house in 2004, first time since 1921. Took control of the senate in 2008, first time ever.

Takes awhile to overcome a century of Democrats being in charge. Need more proof? Just look at New Mexico.
 
Last edited:
Republicans took control of the house in 2004, first time since 2021. Took control of the senate in 2008, first time ever.

Takes awhile to overcome a century of Democrats being in charge. Need more proof? Just look at New Mexico.

I was waiting to see if David could ever figure out this part of what was in the original post. But good for you for pointing it out, it is obvious to only the most blind.
 
Republicans took control of the house in 2004, first time since 1921. Took control of the senate in 2008, first time ever.

Takes awhile to overcome a century of Democrats being in charge. Need more proof? Just look at New Mexico.
So it's gotten better every year since? That data might be fun to go dig out....
 
I was waiting to see if David could ever figure out this part of what was in the original post. But good for you for pointing it out, it is obvious to only the most blind.
The choice between "hey thanks for making a good point..." and "I knew all that but thanks for pointing out the obvious".

Which ever suits you.
 
So it's gotten better every year since? That data might be fun to go dig out....
It’s like ground temperature right after the sun comes up. It doesn’t increase right away. In fact, it even cools just a bit before it starts heating up. Eventually, though, it begins to warm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Let's just cut to the chase instead of whataboutism, is it your position mostly 80 years of consistent Democratic control has NOTHING to do with the situation in New Mexico? Nothing?
Single party dominance is one of perhaps a dozen factors. Would not matter which party it was - dominance by one group is no bueno.

The article cited does back flips to try and prove a point that it is just the Democrats to blame ignoring other examples. It is ironic that a resident of a state that competes with NM on most of those measures whole heartedly leans in on the point - oblivious to similarities.
 
It’s like ground temperature right after the sun comes up. It doesn’t increase right away. In fact, it even cools just a bit before it starts heating up. Eventually, though, it begins to warm.
Is that true? I mean, ground temperature at sun rise continues to drop before it warms?
 
Single party dominance is one of perhaps a dozen factors. Would not matter which party it was - dominance by one group is no bueno.

The article cited does back flips to try and prove a point that it is just the Democrats to blame ignoring other examples. It is ironic that a resident of a state that competes with NM on most of those measures whole heartedly leans in on the point - oblivious to similarities.

When Oklahoma is dominated by Republican politics for 80 years straight we can make a much better comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
For the bulk of our history, Democrats. Republicans running things is a new status for the state, as I am sure that you already knew.
New? A decade and a half is new?

Anyone know the last time a Democratic Presidential candidate carried the state?

1968 if I remember my Oklahoma history correctly. Tricky Dick and the Southern strategy knew where to focus time and effort.

Of course, the socialists had their hey day. Any of you heard of Eugene Debs - Bernie Sanders of his time I suppose.
 
New? A decade and a half is new?

Anyone know the last time a Democratic Presidential candidate carried the state?

1968 if I remember my Oklahoma history correctly. Tricky Dick and the Southern strategy knew where to focus time and effort.

Of course, the socialists had their hey day. Any of you heard of Eugene Debs - Bernie Sanders of his time I suppose.

Actually, Johnson in 1964. Nixon carried all 8 in 1968.
 
New? A decade and a half is new?

Anyone know the last time a Democratic Presidential candidate carried the state?

1968 if I remember my Oklahoma history correctly. Tricky Dick and the Southern strategy knew where to focus time and effort.

Of course, the socialists had their hey day. Any of you heard of Eugene Debs - Bernie Sanders of his time I suppose.
Brad Henry did us no favors. Of course, neither did Mary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Let's be real, for the entire history of the state of Oklahoma we've had a bunch of shitty politicians. At one time almost every single County Commissioner in the state was indicted for corruption. (Democrats BTW).

I think things are going in a better direction with a businessman as Governor but we'll see if the legislature will get anything accomplished besides just being a bunch of corrupt people who are out to enrich themselves, their family and friends.

For the first 70+ years of this states history you couldn't get elected Dog Catcher unless you were a Democrat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT