Gucifer 2.0 has hacked the Clinton Foundation

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

What crime did the media outlets commit that have published guccifer and wikileaks material?

I give up. What crime did they commit?

 

[07pilt]

Hey ass,

You may be comfortable with the layers upon layers of corruption, toe-the-line, ethically challenged behavior that is apparent to anybody with a SMIDGE of intellectual honesty and heft.

If so, that's your bad... It makes you pretty fukin reprehensible and an accessory/enabler to behavior contrary to identified virtues upon which this Republic was founded.

Without the striving for those virtues, the undercurrents of time and lesser, "base" behavior topples the cake, or bastardizes the best system of government the world has known...indeed, a quantifiable source for "good."

So take your circle jerk comment and shove it up your ass, you patsy. You're reverting to the Wood of yesteryear...which is unfortunate. That Wood never missed an opportunity to lecture the masses even in the face of missing the huge, neonsign point.

*And, as always, if I misundersrood some sensible speak dribbling out of your word hole, my bad, and I'll go kick my own ass for a day.

He wasn't making light of corruption. He was making fun of your credulity.

 

[GunsOfFrankEaton]

DCLeaks, instead, for the What it is Worth Department:

http://www.infowars.com/clinton-insiders-emails-published-by-dcleaks/

 

[CBradSmith]

He wasn't making light of corruption. He was making fun of your credulity.

And my response to him is taking his lecturing to task, regardless of who it may have been aimed at.

Does sniping threads in order to do...what exactly?...while contributing next to nothing (let alone acknowledge) constructively critical of the the overall portfolio of shit out of DC and Dem leadership in particular...strike you as particularly valiant behavior?

 

[Medic007]

And my response to him is taking his lecturing to task, regardless of who it may have been aimed at.

I guess I'm not able to view his posts as lecturing. They're comedy monologues at best, and juvenile fits the rest of the time.

 

[07pilt]

Does sniping threads in order to do...what exactly?

I think the point was to shame you into being a little less credulous. Doesn't seem to be working.

 

[CBradSmith]

I think the point was to shame you into being a little less credulous. Doesn't seem to be working.

Not really, not at all.

Are you, Pilt, of the feeling that I should feel shame?

 

[07pilt]

Not really, not at all.

Are you, Pilt, of the feeling that I should feel shame?

I would be embarrassed if rebranding well known and available information as a "Guccifer 2.0 Hack" caused me to breathlessly call for an uprising.

 

[CBradSmith]

I would be embarrassed if rebranding well known and available information as a "Guccifer 2.0 Hack" caused me to breathlessly call for an uprising.

Are you insecure that you don't have a generally good idea of over-arching tendencies on the subject about which we are speaking? Do you think this post alone caused the post for an uprising? Do you think this information, provided recently or years ago (but recent enough to be an earlier version of the current M.O.), alters the gist of the understanding for the reasoning why an uprising could prove beneficial?

You're sniping, too.

And, therefore, you're offering little/nothing in the way of constructive criticism where the criticism is rightly due.

To conclude, why should I respond to anything you say on this topic that doesn't include some recognition and contribution to the advancement of fixing some things that are ailing?

It's just a big game of gotcha to some folks (you?), and that's the fuking kids game that some of you need to grow out of on occasion.

 

[NZ Poke]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-hillary-email-scandal-leaked-emails-revealax

 

[07pilt]

To conclude, why should I respond to anything you say on this topic that doesn't include some recognition and contribution to the advancement of fixing some things that are ailing? It's just a big game of gotcha to some folks (you?), and that's the fuking kids game that some of you need to grow out of on occasion.

Congrats on taking the O-State Illustrated politics board super seriously. Keep waging your war on corruption. Good luck with your uprising.

 

[CBradSmith]

Congrats on taking the O-State Illustrated politics board super seriously. Keep waging your war on corruption. Good luck with your uprising.

Oh get over yourself. You've had enough history on here to know I pop in and out, snide remark here, fact check there, laugh line here...not taking this sh*t overly serious but enjoying a good debate with a worthy opponent whose style is on the up-and-up.

Now you're hitting the Eject button, (uncharacteristically pussy of you) bc, deep down, you know I'm right; that we're getting close to a time where libs, libertarians, and cons, all need to work together on some very common goals against some increasingly alarming trends...and my calling out sniping for its intrinsic lack of value-add to an overall argument without said snipers constructive input toward a solution, is completely merited.

Be better than your response. I, for one, expect more from you (specifically).

Do you ever make it to football games? Call me crazy, but I'm very interested to meet you and @syskatine ...not that you two are that much alike, but you both force me to keep my thinking clear.

 

[07pilt]

Now you're hitting the Eject button, (uncharacteristically pussy of you) bc, deep down, you know I'm right; that we're getting close to a time where libs, libertarians, and cons, all need to work together on some very common goals against some increasingly alarming trends...and my calling out sniping for its intrinsic lack of value-add to an overall argument without said snipers constructive input toward a solution, is completely merited.

I guess I have to wonder why you weren't uprising when George Soros made this information public back in 2009/2010 or when this exact file was released in June. I guess it is just a coincidence that this only got your attention when someone tangentially tied it to the Clinton Foundation.

Maybe back in the day you were making posts about your opposition to Citizens United and I just missed it.

Don't blame me I donated to Lawrence Lessig and voted to Bernie.

 

[CBradSmith]

I guess I have to wonder why you weren't uprising when George Soros made this information public back in 2009/2010 or when this exact file was released in June. I guess it is just a coincidence that this only got your attention when someone tangentially tied it to the Clinton Foundation.

Maybe back in the day you were making posts about your opposition to Citizens United and I just missed it.

Don't blame me I donated to Lawrence Lessig and voted to Bernie.

Now I gotta start questioning your reading comprehension.

 

[07pilt]

I usually skim your word salads to save time

 

[CBradSmith]

I usually skim your word salads to save time

Then I know your type.
I'm through.

 

[07pilt]

Have you no respect for up holding the intellectual discourse of the OState illustrated politics board, sir?

 

[JimmyBob]

Then I know your type.
I'm through.

I'm getting worried about you talking to yourself.

 

[HighStickHarry]

Have you no respect for up holding the intellectual discourse of the OState illustrated politics board, sir?

Would it be more to your taste if he attacked something unrelated and used all caps and !!!!!! For emphasis?

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

Are you insecure that you don't have a generally good idea of over-arching tendencies on the subject about which we are speaking? Do you think this post alone caused the post for an uprising? Do you think this information, provided recently or years ago (but recent enough to be an earlier version of the current M.O.), alters the gist of the understanding for the reasoning why an uprising could prove beneficial?

You're sniping, too.

And, therefore, you're offering little/nothing in the way of constructive criticism where the criticism is rightly due.

To conclude, why should I respond to anything you say on this topic that doesn't include some recognition and contribution to the advancement of fixing some things that are ailing?

It's just a big game of gotcha to some folks (you?), and that's the fuking kids game that some of you need to grow out of on occasion.