Gucifer 2.0 has hacked the Clinton Foundation
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
That may very well explain why Wikileaks held back this morning. I had a gut feeling that something would be announced before the end of the day today relating to the overall picture.
If this stuff is remotely true...
And stuff like the DOJ dropping charges against a Libyan arms dealer threatening to talk regarding policy...
Jesus help us if HillDawg wins.
Means she'll be out for blood (again)
And that over 50% of those voting just don't give a sh*t, period.
And stuff like the DOJ dropping charges against a Libyan arms dealer threatening to talk regarding policy...
Jesus help us if HillDawg wins.
Means she'll be out for blood (again)
And that over 50% of those voting just don't give a sh*t, period.
While you're all happy that foreign hackers are stealing american data I would just like to share a joke:
Wait. Is guccifer 2.0 George Soros? http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/02/tarp-recipients-paid-out-114-m/
see, that's part of the problem with the current administration...can't smell cheap when it's right under their nose and don't know the difference...i.e. oblivious to reality.
While you're all happy that foreign hackers are stealing american data I would just like to share a joke:
Just be honest for once. You have no issue with the lack of security of your Queen's emails. You're just pissed because your icons are looking like the piles of shit they are with these hacked documents. If they were hacking Trump and the Republicans, you'd be rubbing your nipples with glee and gloating about all of the bad shit getting released.While you're all happy that foreign hackers are stealing american data I would just like to share a joke:
It's funny that hackers hate Hillary too!
While you're all happy that foreign hackers are stealing american data I would just like to share a joke:
American data?
No. they are exposing frauds who are clearly incompetent and corrupt. I'm very happy that they are.
You know, you're right. That did it. I'm voting Trump.
GO CRIMINALS! We love theft and privacy invasion. Since we dislike the victim, the crime and invasion of privacy is okay. We really need to control this country because we have such a strong sense of right and wrong and equality under the law. Trust us to use power responsibly and in an even handed manner.
Then I suppose you believe that the New York Times is also criminal for illegally publishing parts of Donald Trump's tax returns?
(Tax returns that showed no illegality, by the way.)
I give exactly as much of a shit about criminals being victims of other criminals as Obama does.
Isn't this exactly why all the patriots have ar15's. What's enough? What are they waiting on?
A perfect example of the mind control a queen bee has over her drones. The irony is just soooooo irony.
If it was Trump's data, the other side and media would call for his head. stfu
Funny guy. That went over as well as a full dirty diaper left in the Walmart parking lot. You know the kind.
I think it's insane he wont' release them, but yes, as a matter of fact if the NY Times hacked his "cyber" then they should be prosecuted and made an example. I don't know the backstory though. What's the crime they committed?
Guys, I hate to break the bad news to you, but this appears to be a hoax.
The documents released are from the Virginia Democratic Party and previously released documents from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
The Daily Caller (which is anti-Hilary as it gets) reviewed the release and said the following: "A review of the newly released documents, however, reveals no information about the Clinton Foundation.
Instead, the documents appear to come mostly from the Democratic Party of Virginia. Other documents appear to come from the national Democratic party."
The documents released are from the Virginia Democratic Party and previously released documents from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
The Daily Caller (which is anti-Hilary as it gets) reviewed the release and said the following: "A review of the newly released documents, however, reveals no information about the Clinton Foundation.
Instead, the documents appear to come mostly from the Democratic Party of Virginia. Other documents appear to come from the national Democratic party."
Then or now (obviously old info since pertains to TARP), doesn't excuse the deed.
Chuck Ross @ChuckRossDC 50m50 minutes ago
Huma Abedin and Doug Band don't know who the hell Dave Brubeck is? "Some singer dude," writes Huma.pic.twitter.com/JaC9lz0Z87
Huma Abedin and Doug Band don't know who the hell Dave Brubeck is? "Some singer dude," writes Huma.pic.twitter.com/JaC9lz0Z87
That's not what the documents actually show.
They show the amount of money given to Democratic Candidates from employees of various banks and companies bailed out by Tarp. Not actual TARP funds being funneled into Democratic Campaign accounts. Corporations cannot contribute funds directly to campaigns.
If that were true, that would be completely illegal and there would almost certainly have been ethics complaints filed in Congress and with the FEC. Do you honestly think that with Republicans controlling congress for the last several years, if there had been actual Tarp funds used to finance campaigns, that not a single Rep member of Congress wouldn't have raised a stink about it? These are the identical documents release back June/July and have you heard or seen ANYONE that works for the RNC or any elected Rep Official claim that there was any illegal activity on that front?
It also is being reported that the file marked "Pay to Play" actually consists of opposition research which was done by the DCCC, but the contents were about Republican members of Congress they were targeting during the coming election cycle.
Sorry for having interrupted the usual circle-
They show the amount of money given to Democratic Candidates from employees of various banks and companies bailed out by Tarp. Not actual TARP funds being funneled into Democratic Campaign accounts. Corporations cannot contribute funds directly to campaigns.
If that were true, that would be completely illegal and there would almost certainly have been ethics complaints filed in Congress and with the FEC. Do you honestly think that with Republicans controlling congress for the last several years, if there had been actual Tarp funds used to finance campaigns, that not a single Rep member of Congress wouldn't have raised a stink about it? These are the identical documents release back June/July and have you heard or seen ANYONE that works for the RNC or any elected Rep Official claim that there was any illegal activity on that front?
It also is being reported that the file marked "Pay to Play" actually consists of opposition research which was done by the DCCC, but the contents were about Republican members of Congress they were targeting during the coming election cycle.
Sorry for having interrupted the usual circle-
Last edited:
'Wood, you are giving Republicans in the Congress a lot of credit. Frankly, they have been afraid to do much of anything meaningful against Democrats for fear they might see their own shadow.
Hey ass,
You may be comfortable with the layers upon layers of corruption, toe-the-line, ethically challenged behavior that is apparent to anybody with a SMIDGE of intellectual honesty and heft.
If so, that's your bad... It makes you pretty fukin reprehensible and an accessory/enabler to behavior contrary to identified virtues upon which this Republic was founded.
Without the striving for those virtues, the undercurrents of time and lesser, "base" behavior topples the cake, or bastardizes the best system of government the world has known...indeed, a quantifiable source for "good."
So take your circle jerk comment and shove it up your ass, you patsy. You're reverting to the Wood of yesteryear...which is unfortunate. That Wood never missed an opportunity to lecture the masses even in the face of missing the huge, neonsign point.
*And, as always, if I misundersrood some sensible speak dribbling out of your word hole, my bad, and I'll go kick my own ass for a day.
How anyone can look at the widespread, deep corruption in Washington, D.C. and not be completely outraged is a person who doesn't even live in the same universe as I do. Trump has helped lift the rock under which these bugs have hidden for decades. The hackers who have brought these crooks and the details of their activities to the attention of the American people are heroes to me.
Last edited:
Do we know how many Republicans took money from TARP bailout banks? The Dems sure do a lot of sabre rattling regarding big banks but seem to have no problem stuffing their pockets with cash from them.
Because it isn't a good thing to question the Party. The Democrats have made it clear that if you aren't 100% committed to the agendas, you're racist, homophobic, Islamophobic, misogynist, redneck, toothless, deplorable, hate the poor, etc.
The low information side of the constituency is too dumb to understand anything but the word "free" and the limousine side is too afraid of being labeled to bother with anything resembling reality. They see the flames of the Republican Party and want no part of their security blanket being burned to the ground.
Liberals have become incapable of rational and objective thought. If one of them comes up with something, they all fall in line.
So you were against what the editor at the NY times did exposing Trump's tax returns?
Well, you asked if I had a problem with the publishing them, now its morphed to how they were obtained. Like I said, I don't know everything that happened. I answered your question, why don't you answer mine. What crime did the NY Times commit?
What crime did the media outlets commit that have published guccifer and wikileaks material?
Similar threads
