Typical psychological projection that this board has come to expect of you.Stupid. And arrogant. You must be quite the hit around town. Lol.
Typical psychological projection that this board has come to expect of you.Stupid. And arrogant. You must be quite the hit around town. Lol.
And another. (And triggered, too. Reeeeeeee!!!!!! Rebel flag!!!!!!!!)Laughing at Confederate/White Power boy, the guy who proclaims "looser" with every post, that amuses me
Damn, thought Dave had a self awareness moment for a minute but when he didn't mention Chubby in there I knew he hadn't. 🤣Stupid. And arrogant. You must be quite the hit around town. Lol.
Lets play.Let's inventory the most recent wins from the GOP:
Its the left that fights against school vouchers and ensure that minorities in poor performing school districts (like those in most Big Blue cities) are stuck and can't go to the same schools the rich white liberals are sending their kids.
- Reinstating school segregation
The number one driver of child labor in America today is via immigrants crossing the border which I'm pretty sure is a key tenet of the Dem platform.
- Rolling back child labor laws
You mean for distributing pornographic material to minors? Maybe that legal in Portland, but in most of America, that is illegal.
- Threatening to arrest librarians for <checks notes>being librarians</checks notes>
I agree with you here, although I'd note that its a binary choice. I either let doctors permanently mutilate children and abort perfectly healthy babies or I have to choose to legislate it. I don't like it. But I like the Dem alternative even worse.
- Legislating plans of care to protect us all from those evil doctors
You aren't allowed to use the term woman. Your party refuses to define it.
- Declaring women incapable of deciding their own healthcare
Both sides do this. They just frame the narrative based on the tax cuts or financial incentives their party supports, as the SALT discussions have clearly demonstrated. I'll happily vote for either party's candidates as soon as they promise to cut spending as that's what government really needs.
- Prioritizing protecting tax cuts over the health of the economy
You mean like installing work requirements for said assistance? Ooh. How terrible.
- Advocating for achieving deficit reduction goals by slashing assistance to the poor
Boom. Roasted.Lets play.
Its the left that fights against school vouchers and ensure that minorities in poor performing school districts (like those in most Big Blue cities) are stuck and can't go to the same schools the rich white liberals are sending their kids.
The number one driver of child labor in America today is via immigrants crossing the border which I'm pretty sure is a key tenet of the Dem platform.
You mean for distributing pornographic material to minors? Maybe that legal in Portland, but in most of America, that is illegal.
I agree with you here, although I'd note that its a binary choice. I either let doctors permanently mutilate children and abort perfectly healthy babies or I have to choose to legislate it. I don't like it. But I like the Dem alternative even worse.
You aren't allowed to use the term woman. Your party refuses to define it.
Both sides do this. They just frame the narrative based on the tax cuts or financial incentives their party supports, as the SALT discussions have clearly demonstrated. I'll happily vote for either party's candidates as soon as they promise to cut spending as that's what government really needs.
You mean like installing work requirements for said assistance? Ooh. How terrible.
Shocked that neither Oregon or Illinois is on that list. I mean if you really want me to take gerrymandering seriously, you have to be willing to call out both sides.Starting the cheat early.
Shocked that neither Oregon or Illinois is on that list. I mean if you really want me to take gerrymandering seriously, you have to be willing to call out both sides.
That really is hilarious.Sounds good let’s do that…
Would you agree Republican gerrymandering is significantly more commonplace and disenfranchising?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣You aren't allowed to use the term woman. Your party refuses to define it.
Shocked that neither Oregon or Illinois is on that list. I mean if you really want me to take gerrymandering seriously, you have to be willing to call out both sides.
Sounds good let’s do that…
Would you agree Republican gerrymandering is significantly more commonplace and disenfranchising?
Nope. I think both parties are as egregious as possible without violating whatever state laws may be in place.Sounds good let’s do that…
Would you agree Republican gerrymandering is significantly more commonplace and disenfranchising?
Which state do you think the Dems have gerrymandered the most?Nope. I think both parties are as egregious as possible without violating whatever state laws may be in place.
Democrook redistricting plan in Louisiana had parts of Shreveport and New Orleans in the same congressional district. For reference, that’d be like having Guymon and Idabel in the same district. Just sayin’, porky.Which state do you think the Dems have gerrymandered the most?
Nope. I think both parties are as egregious as possible without violating whatever state laws may be in place.
Do you really wanna dig this hole? Cmon man lol…you can’t be this disingenuous in real life, can you?
carry on
Do you really wanna dig this hole? Cmon man lol…you can’t be this disingenuous in real life, can you?
carry on
I don’t know the answer to your question about whether Republicans or Democrats gerrymander the most. Isn’t one of the perks for a state party apparatus that whichever party controls the state legislature is the party with the power to gerrymander? If that’s true I think Republicans control more state governments than Democrats. So the logical deduction would be Republicans gerrymander the most. I assume you already knew the answer to your question and you thought you’d slip in a quick “gotcha.” So is my answer correct?Do you really wanna dig this hole? Cmon man lol…you can’t be this disingenuous in real life, can you?
carry on
![]()
How Gerrymandering Helped House Democrats in 2022 | National Review
House Democrats benefitted from gerrymandering, as election analysts now report.www.nationalreview.com
Dumbass.
I would love to see your breakdown on the history of gerrymandering by party with links to fair and accurate sources.
Democrats embarked on a riskier strategy of drawing as many Democratic-leaning seats as possible — and it paid off. Democrats won 24 of the 25 seats they set out to draw for themselves in Illinois, Nevada, New Mexico and Oregon — including five seats by less than five points.You didn’t actually take the time to self-check your self-own here, did you? hahahahaha
If the National Review’s scathing research is similar to Cook’s findings (linked in the story)….how do you explain this???
The Impact of 2022 Redistricting
Republicans continue to benefit from an electoral map tilted in their favor on nearly all levels. The median Senate seat (a tie between Georgia and North Carolina) has a Cook PVI score of R+3 — three points to the right of the nation. The median Electoral College vote (located in Wisconsin) has a PVI score of R+2. And after redistricting, the median House seat (Michigan's 8th CD) retains a modest skew of R+1, virtually unchanged from the old map.
“DuMBaSs”
carry on
I don’t know the answer to your question about whether Republicans or Democrats gerrymander the most.
You can start with the Cook report linked in the self-pwning dumbass’s post.
carry on
Damn I was hoping for your first ever comprehensive post that backed up your paper thin intellectualism. Rats.
Guess we’ll have to remain dependent upon your cogent and thorough analyses of the fairness of voting districts in America…what with 50 poiNts hiGhEr iQ to work with and all. Rats.
carry on
Who created that map? Serious question, I am not aware who controls redistricting in LA.Democrook redistricting plan in Louisiana had parts of Shreveport and New Orleans in the same congressional district. For reference, that’d be like having Guymon and Idabel in the same district. Just sayin’, porky.
Pitiful and jealous much?David Allen school of smug and stupid.
Do you have an example you want to highlight? @soonerinlOUisiana thought he had something...I would love to see your breakdown on the history of gerrymandering by party with links to fair and accurate sources.
FIFY, dipshit. When you’re not talking out your ass, you’re reading and listening through it, poor bastard.Do you have an example you want to highlight? @soonerinlOUisiana had something...
Can you show me where race is the reason for these people wanting to go to private schools? Could it be that these people want to escape the problems of public schools?It says exactly what I think it says. Nice try though!
David just suffered an aneurysm. Somebody call 911.Can you show me where race is the reason for these people wanting to go to private schools? Could it be that these people want to escape the problems of public schools?
Why the need to rescind antisegregation agreements?Can you show me where race is the reason for these people wanting to go to private schools? Could it be that these people want to escape the problems of public schools?
Who created the bastardized LA district? Seems a simple question.FIFY, dipshit. When you’re not talking out your ass, you’re reading and listening through it, poor bastard.
Huey would right things. 👍Who created the bastardized LA district? Seems a simple question.
Pitiful and jealous much?
Do you have an example you want to highlight? @soonerinlOUisiana thought he had something...
Why the need to rescind antisegregation agreements?
Sssshhhhhhhhh, Dodge is huntin wabbits....Cities controlled by leftists for decades are still pretty segregated.
Sssshhhhhhhhh, Dodge is huntin wabbits....