Gillibrand (NY) becomes first sitting senator to call to abolish ICE
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
She’s just smart enough to repeat her Marxist indoctrination, and just stupid enough to never question it — while being confident in her delivery.
These are the eyes of a true believer:
These are the eyes of a true believer:
thank god she only 1 vote
yet represents a future america dodged thanks to trump and maga
It’s self evident to anyone who doesn’t want open borders.
Let's just abolish the military while we are at as well.
Im pretty sure that's a non starter for a decent sized majority.
As in "how can we vote for a party that professes this" level of nonstarter.
As in "how can we vote for a party that professes this" level of nonstarter.
So basically, anyone that advocates “abolish the ICE” is either calling for one of two things, right?
1) Replace ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) with another agency or two or three to perform immigration and customs enforcement.
2) Stop enforcing immigration and customs enforcement.
1) Replace ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) with another agency or two or three to perform immigration and customs enforcement.
2) Stop enforcing immigration and customs enforcement.
Sounds exactly like someone on this board....just change “Marxist” to “/pol/, red pill, MAGA”.
I’m quoting that certain someone in this post.
I fundamentally disagree with Ocasio-Cortex on most topics but I respect her. She is intelligent and seems genuine and honest. I can respect that.
Gillibrand is just a f*cking moron. A massive hypocrite too when you consider her thoughts about Bill Clinton and then President Trump.
The blue districts will be super blue, but the real Americans arent going to go for this shit. What is wrong with these people?
you'd think they could find a different mountain to die on....but it's ok.
I don’t think she’s dumb.
And she definitely shouldn’t be underestimated — especially by the neoliberal Dem establishment who badly screwed Bernie Sanders, and especially f*cked over his supporters.
But in Venezuela (the model for 21st century Marxist revolution) they’re now eating rats, dogs and zoo animals. And there’s little medicine or toilet paper.
Yet Mexico, knowing what’s currently happening in Venezuela, is on the cusp of electing a hard core Marxist — and now we have this emerging NY lady.
What’s the enduring appeal of Marxism in the 21st century? (Considering it always ends in failure and misery)
I’m currently reading books on the history of the Bolshevik revolution (it’s incredibly fascinating), but I’m yet to deeply study the ideology and theory itself.
Something keeps drawing people back to Marxism despite its terrible record. At some point I’ll probably have to bite the bullet and read Marx and Engels.
One or the other....
“Reform ICE”, I could understand. And probably would support in a general sense.
Shuffle the deck chairs or quit all together....I just don’t get how anyone doesn’t see that as just outright pandering without offering any real solution. I know it’s politics, but I don’t recall seeing anything this extreme recently.
The left is a run away train.
https://www.dangerous.com/44747/starbucks-full-sex-changes-for-all-employees/
https://www.dangerous.com/44747/starbucks-full-sex-changes-for-all-employees/
I’ll raise you by 2 billion people.
Check out the last post of my RNC video thread — it’s also a good time to re-watch the video.
I'd like to be the first lib here on the incel board to call for ICE to be broken up. I heard the head guy on the radio the other day and he came across as a tone-deaf, thick headed, dumb cop. They aren't up for handling tricky situations or children. Start all over, that agency is sick.
Interesting that the right feels the need to scrutinize health benefits provided by public corporations now. This is freedom #amiright. #itstheirturn.
Setting aside what you think about Sen. Gillibrand as a person or as an intellectual, what do you find so objectionable about what she said in that interview? She thinks the agency is performing badly and it should be reformed into another agency or two. I’m not understanding what is wrong with her words? The agency is performing badly and at the very least needs reforming and greater oversight.
Would someone please explain what is so mistaken about what she said, without maligning her character?
Would someone please explain what is so mistaken about what she said, without maligning her character?
So they're going to choose to offer this expensive elective in addition to making shitty coffee?
I'd be pissed if I were a shareholder.
Obviously there are going to be extreme cases like that good grief. There is no right answer for stuff like that because his countrymen have let him down for generations. Now it’s America’s fault for trying to enforce our laws.
Obviously they can do whatever they want. I for sure will not be protesting. I won’t be calling my senator. I don’t use their product so a boycott isn’t even on the table.
I will however comment as much as I want how ridiculous it is to help people ruin their lives when obviously they need mental help. If one of your coworkers wanted to be a Fish and he wanted google to pay for gills and catfish whiskers would you go to your boss and request that? These people need help in the worst way and there is no coming back from that surgery. You are neither male or female when it’s over.
Now that's a well thought out, common sense response.
My how the roles have reversed.
Who what where?? My wife got my phone while I was on the can.
David was given the opportunity to learn a life lesson, courtesy of your wife and your long shits.
Geezus dude. Does Obamacare ring a bell? After the left ruined affordable healthcare for many of us, they should be thrilled the right is just criticizing Starbucks and not taking action to regulate their decisions.
No. Harry took my phone after his wife took his. Harry posted that. He does take long shits and if I catch hepatitis HSH, I'm gonna break his hands for not washing them.
