Why though? I only defended the discussion, not a conclusion.Am I asking you very specific questions about it?
Why though? I only defended the discussion, not a conclusion.Am I asking you very specific questions about it?
First, I've always called names.
Second, why do I have to follow your either/or narrative?
Third, what happened to her?
Why though? I only defended the discussion, not a conclusion.
Sorry guys, I have given up on discussing race with you. But it is interesting that a free speech warrior isis tryi to get me to police the mere discussion of white privilege on Twitter. It's almost like the occasional braying about free speech is insincere.You're an oak.
Sorry guys, I have given up on discussing race with you. But it is interesting that a free speech warrior isis tryi to get me to police the mere discussion of white privilege on Twitter. It's almost like the occasional braying about free speech is insincere.
I'm not going to police speech for youI don't give a flip if you discuss.
But do us a courtesy and police those shaming and accusing within your ranks.
And don't put words in my mouth.
Fair enough on the bloviating.
What's your 3rd way?
I'm not going to police speech for you
To accept into your heart the glory of Christ.
Fair enough on the bloviating.
What's your 3rd way?
I don't understand how her wearing a Biff shirt and showing a gun makes my "side" corrupt and authoritarian. Did something happen to her?
Third, what happened to her?
It's not speech? Define speech?Not speech.
Talk to your tribe about courtesy. It's your tribe, right. You're a part of it.
Engage them with your brilliant ideas and show them the fallacy of their current practice...shaming, threatening, dividing.
This is why it's hard for thoughtful people to engage you, Brad. When they try you ignore their sensible questions. Now for the third time: what happened to this poor girl? Something must have happened to her for you to be calling on me to police my "side." I wish you'd show some concern for her instead of using her as a prop. I'd love to share a third way -- off the corporate, conservative messaging for money narrative, way -- but I don't know what type of behavior I'm supposed to remedy.
It's not speech? Define speech?
Saying something is white privilege is not speech?Am I to assume that you are fine with people of your side issuing threats threats, shaming, and bullying online?
If so, why the coyness. Just say you're okay with it.
Saying something is white privilege is not speech?
I already said I'm okay with it.
Am I to assume that you are fine with people of your side issuing threats threats, shaming, and bullying online?
The real question is what you define as speech, Brad. I don't think pointing out white privilege is a threat. And I think protection of the free exchange of ideas is more important than worrying about shaming and bullying. (We already know you don't actually care about shaming or bullying either)That doesn't answer my specific questions to you, formed as open- ended assumptions here:
Really a yes or no will suffice.
The real question is what you define as speech, Brad. I don't think pointing out white privilege is a threat. And I think protection of the free exchange of ideas is more important than worrying about shaming and bullying. (We already know you don't actually care about shaming or bullying either)
I don't want persuade or police people into not discussing race. I don't think what you are describing is a better way of being.That's odd as it's generally understood by all that you, Pilt, can't censor people.
But you certainly can attempt to persuade. "Police"
So you're cool with not attempting to teach your side a better way of being?
I don't want persuade or police people into not discussing race. I don't think what you are describing is a better way of being.
You have never established that calling something white privilege is any of the above.Thanks. You're fine with shaming, accusations, threats, bullying.
That's all I wanted to hear from you.
Which is... wait for it... From the front lines of modern leftists in practice: Graybeards (you) from your side okay with the lack of courtesy and breakdown of civil discourse (in the form of those things mentioned above).
I just made myself 2 scrambled eggs and 2 slices of toast. White privilege?You have never established that calling something white privilege is any of the above.
I support you interrogating this issue. You should seek out someone different perspectives if you are genuinely concerned.I just made myself 2 scrambled eggs and 2 slices of toast. White privilege?
I'm seeking your perspective.I support you interrogating this issue. You should seek out someone different perspectives if you are genuinely concerned.
I can confirm it is morning person privilege.
My perspective is I don't know.I'm seeking your perspective.
If I had eggs and toast for dinner, would it be evening person privilege?
Well thanks for nothing and thanks.My perspective is I don't know.
No
I do support your search for truth though.Well thanks for nothing and thanks.
@CBradSmith, I have taken your suggestion to hear, and it appears to have been incredibly effective. I policed the left for only 15 minutes and already I have stopped the left from:
Sending people Nazi gas chamber memes
Mocking people with "we wuz kangz"
Threatening to beat or spank David Hogg
most impressively after my efforts, the left doesn't have any Atomwaffens.
Not wanting to be a glory hog I have paused my efforts to allow you to catch up on your policing of the right. Once you have matched my achievements, I will resume.
Good job.
Very altruistic.
I remember when the homophobes lined up like it was Easter lol.
Ohhhh...my mistake lol...no chick-fail-a on Sundays haha