ADVERTISEMENT

Found: Evidence of Russian collusion

CBradSmith

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
Sep 21, 2005
26,760
28,092
113




More to come: maybe Adam Schiff finally found those nudes of the president.

giphy.gif
 

Adam Schiff (Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, asserted that Justice Department officials told both parties during a briefing in December that they ultimately found they “could not trust” Campbell when he was working as an FBI informant.

Justice officials also said that Campbell had at no point made “any allegations of corruption, illegality, or impropriety on Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, President Clinton, the Uranium One deal, or [the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States],” according to the Democrats. ”

Weird...shocking.

Carry on.
 
What do you expect the D's to say?

Did you actually read it, you fool? Lol...let’s try again:

“Justice Department officials told both parties during a briefing in December that they ultimately found they “could not trust” Campbell when he was working as an FBI informant.

Justice officials also said that Campbell had at no point made “any allegations of corruption, illegality, or impropriety on Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, President Clinton, the Uranium One deal, or [the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States]



So Trump’s Justice Department says Campbell isn’t trustworthy. Weird...almost as if it’s exactly what it is - more distractions haha. His testimony wasn’t even recorded, he wasn’t even sworn in lol. Some informant.

Carry on.
 
And it’s hilarious that to assert I’m “losing the argument”, when The Hill can’t even piece together the true merits of its own article lol, and yet it’s peddled as a turning point for you haha. Gullibility is rampant amongst the right these days.

Carry on.
 
The same Justice Department officials that claim they couldn't trust Campbell are the ones that "trusted" Chris Steele, even maintaining a relationship with him after they were forced to publicly cut ties with him because of his media shopping. And we're now supposed to trust the liars in the Justice Department?

You seriously can't make this stuff up.
 
Justice officials also said that Campbell had at no point made “any allegations of corruption, illegality, or impropriety on Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, President Clinton, the Uranium One deal, or [the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States]
I’d like to see the transcript to see the Q and A on this testimony.

So Trump’s Justice Department says Campbell isn’t trustworthy.
Dude, that statement is meaningless insofar as establishing credibility for your side. Was it Andrew McCabe who said that? Or Peter Strzok? Lots of partisan hacks working at “Trump’s Justice Department “. Or somebody else with actual integrity? Not bagging on you personally, but that quote is vague.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
The same Justice Department officials that claim they couldn't trust Campbell are the ones that "trusted" Chris Steele, even maintaining a relationship with him after they were forced to publicly cut ties with him because of his media shopping. And we're now supposed to trust the liars in the Justice Department?

You seriously can't make this stuff up.

rather solid point
 
I’d like to see the transcript to see the Q and A on this testimony.


Dude, that statement is meaningless insofar as establishing credibility for your side. Was it Andrew McCabe who said that? Or Peter Strzok? Lots of partisan hacks working at “Trump’s Justice Department “. Or somebody else with actual integrity? Not bagging on you personally, but that quote is vague.

I’d love to see the testimony too, but they didn’t even record it. Tells me how little they actually trust him.
 
ChubbyClownCar, @CSCOTTOSUPOKES

Have you ever been put into a position of trust & responsibility, where you were relied on to make appropriate decisions, and you made a bad decision? Did your bad decision ultimately have consequences?

Chubby,

We can unpack this further .

Have you ever been in a place of ETHICAL responsibility? (As if responsibility can exist without some form of Ethic attached to it).

When you held such a position, did you go to great lengths to ensure that the ethic attached to your responsibility was honored by giving it 'wide berth' to the casual observer? Meaning, you made effort to ensure that there was never a reason to question your observance of the ethic?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
The same Justice Department officials that claim they couldn't trust Campbell are the ones that "trusted" Chris Steele, even maintaining a relationship with him after they were forced to publicly cut ties with him because of his media shopping. And we're now supposed to trust the liars in the Justice Department?

You seriously can't make this stuff up.

One (Campbell) is a random FBI “informant” whose info isn’t even trusted by either party. The other was hired by conservatives first to research Trump, was a British intelligence officer and at one time ran the Russia desk for the British embassy.
 
One (Campbell) is a random FBI “informant” whose info isn’t even trusted by either party. The other was hired by conservatives first to research Trump, was a British intelligence officer and at one time ran the Russia desk for the British embassy.
Do you actually think that "hired by conservatives" lends credibility to Steele, Fusion GPS, or the clowns in the FBI? You interject that as if it has relevance.
 
Why do you ignore everything after the uniparty hire?

love it when this steele thing circles to the R’s
like nobody even reads what mccain has to say about the nunez memo

oh wait here you go, how is this one standing the test of time?

 
  • Like
Reactions: NZ Poke
You are literally spinning out of control.

Lol

Carry on.

Yup...I’m the one out of control lol. I’m the one who can’t accept the facts and drives the narrative, despite even republicans admitting the board narrative is wrong haha.


Carry on.
 
Yup...I’m the one out of control lol. I’m the one who can’t accept the facts and drives the narrative, despite even republicans admitting the board narrative is wrong haha.


Carry on.

do you not realize trump burned the R’s to the ground?
 
Haha I guessed I missed that part. Evidence? Links? His blame game isn’t what it used to be, so I need concrete examples lol.

Carry on.

he’s the president of the united states of america elected in what the R speaker of the house called a referendum and admitted the R’s rode trumps coattails to victory

do i need to link this for you?
 
Haha I guessed I missed that part. Evidence? Links? His blame game isn’t what it used to be, so I need concrete examples lol.

Carry on.

why is this so hard to understand?

i think your penchant for being obtuse and combative is an unhealthy way of communicating via the internet.

i hope it’s just an artistic exercise for you
 
why is this so hard to understand?

i think your penchant for being obtuse and combative is an unhealthy way of communicating via the internet.

i hope it’s just an artistic exercise for you

I think your penchant for bullsh!t is unhealthy lol. I hope it’s just constipation.

Carry on.
 
If that’s the test for trustworthiness, then they just told you they don’t trust Hillary, either.

Can’t wait for her trial. Any day now right? I mean...Republicans have it all figured out by now on her lol. They’ve got all the evidence they need...Fox News told em so haha.

Carry on.
 
Can’t wait for her trial. Any day now right? I mean...Republicans have it all figured out by now on her lol. They’ve got all the evidence they need...Fox News told em so haha.

Carry on.
You seem to have completely missed the parallel. Or maybe you just ignored it. If I need to provide a better explanation, I’m willing to do so.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT