He admitted this in his post. If 7 or 8 is too much reassess.
For those who want to ban so called, "assault rifles"....
- Thread starter MegaPoke
- Start date
I had a 300 blackout until it was stolen recently. I assume this caliber is okay.
I don't have guns anymore.
I lost all of them in a poker game.
I lost all of them in a poker game.
This is all so racist. White nationalists everywhere, obviously they don’t follow the law so law abiding minorities can’t have equal firepower? It’s not like the racist police are going to help we know that. @Syskatine just wants law abiding blacks to be unarmed with gangs and white nationalists running around with weapons of war. They can have three bullets at a time though. It’s like with sys’s view on guns and abortion he wants black genocide to just be done already.
Hate to hear that. I lost all mine in a freak jet ski accident.
I had a similar experience when standard skiing but only dropped one of the two...
Got a bud that deer hunts with a Mini 14.Moron gun grabber on Tucker tonight: “Nobody hunts deer with an AK.”
He's deadly with it up to 150 yards.
Just out of curiosity - and I ask this with utmost humility - out of your 22 years of service how many times were you involved in actual combat, putting your 7-time expertise with the M-16 to use while having someone else shoot back at you?
That is so brutal.
But yet so true. Welcomed to the disarmed (except for Maduro loyalists) Bernie's socialist utopia of Venezuela...
And you claim you own 30+ firearms?
He is trolling with the revolver thing right?
Not a chance in hell. He's only had more experience with a vagina than he's had with a firearm if we count his birth. Otherwise he's scoreless on both.
He is an 'at risk' poster.
Sys, 30 plus guns my ass. More like this I imagine and if the other guy has a water gun his ass is running away.
3+? So anything over 2? Or something similar to typical 7-8 chamber revolvers..
I hope you are trolling here.
You are still going to need to define assault weapons. And maybe suburban dorks.
NATO 5.56 (M16) is very slightly hotter than .223 (AR). Both rounds can get over 3000 fps which can cause a shockwave and tumbling and splintering. .308 / .30 06 can get to 2700 fps which can still do the same but with a much heavier round and a lot more power getting it there - so it’ll hold that speed further.
A .270 Winchester will get over 3100 fps.
Still haven’t defined an assault rifle.
Yeah but the founding was completely different. The exploration was different. Guns are an inextricably central component of American history.
It’s really not been that successfully done. Certainly not in our context. There is no direct comparison. We’ve discussed this.
Why not? Because Constitutional rights aren’t a good place for social experiments. It should be set in stone.
Slippery slope.
Why am I thinking this really happened?
Were we in person I'd slap you. So? Yes, of course the people are broken. It's easier to take away the gun than to fix all these random broken people. If there's some prairie fire of "fix people" that I'm unaware of, please apprise. Or some movement towards fixing the other 400 obstacles you can create before we stop the gun abuse.
Maybe it's getting worse and not better. We're supposed to wait for some Great Awakening? Who or what on the radar screen is bringing that? How many excuses until some basic, basic things are done that works? Or we just outsmart the nitwits?
1. Government isn't the threat. There are other threats government protects us from. Unless the NRA is gonna take on Big Tech?
2. You can always arm up. A lot harder to get them away from morons.
3. This is such a waste of time. The groundhog day nature of these mass shootings are intolerable and only getting worse and it's a game to you guys.
2 shotguns and several pistols. There's an old childhood $80 sks in there, too, with a cracked stock and crooked iron sight but it's such a p.o.s. it doesn't really count.
Please come to the tailgate. I might even provide the ticket.
I'll guarantee your safety, given you don't initiate physical altercation.
Which gun type did McVeigh use again? Or did this thread turn into a discussion about banning fertilizer sales when I wasnt looking?
That would be inadvisable.
Sure. If you are actually taking away guns from broken people and not recklessly removing the single greatest safeguard to our freedom that exists in a fools errand that in reality won't make any difference. There is no chance of eradicating guns from the United States. None. And that's what you would have to do to substantively change gun violence. The unintended consequences of where this goes every time a bad idea doesn't work are unacceptable.
No, but some measure of reality would be nice. The reality is that there is no quick fix and mutilating the Constitution isn't going to solve anything. That document is why after a 1/4 millennium, we are the undisputed greatest nation in the history of mankind. Who in their right mind wants to fvck around with the thing that clearly enabled that fact to be? Find other solutions. There is nothing to suggest that shot in the dark would work, but it's consequences could literally be bloody revolution/civil war and the destruction of a unified Continental United States. I cannot fathom how anyone thinks that's a risk worth taking.
Dumbest thing you've ever said. Maybe not today - but 20 years from now? 50? You have no earthly idea if it will be a threat or not. Also, the reason it isn't a threat today could very well be the problematic fact that we are armed. Take that away, and you change the chemistry of the equation. It's stupid. It's shortsighted. It's not happening.
This is where you become completely childish and intolerable. You think you care, but it's a game to "us guys." It's a classic dehumanization of "other" in order to sooth your own confirmation bias against people who disagree with you. There's no way to intelligently debate anyone who believes we are bad people as a starting point. You are wrong. it's no game. it's deadly real. A buyback program in this country would be a flashpoint to horrific violence.
Sorry bro. That is literally an assault rifle / weapon of war. It's likely a Vietnam war trophy, and more likely than not has a violent combat history. Take a look at your sorry old SKS that "doesn't count" and re-imagine it with a new stock and magazine upgrade.
Tell me sys... what is this?
The SKS shoots the same ammo as an AK47. It's a Chinese assault rifle. You don't think it counts because it has an ugly wooden stock with a crack in it, but that's just cosmetic. You would absolutely have to sell it to the government like a good boy if some dickface like Beta O'Dork has their way, or become a felon like the rest of us.
Did you type this with your feet?
Good God almighty where did you go to law school? Government by definition is a threat to freedom. Therefore its powers should be granted sparingly, and limits to those powers should be imposed liberally. 1st year constitutional law.
What seems to be completely lost on leftists is that the political party that creates sanctuary cities to aid criminal illegal aliens in avoiding federal law enforcement, wants open borders, hates law enforcement, and coddles criminals wants to take away a tool of self defense from those of us who choose to protect ourselves from the inevitable effects of those moronic leftist policies.
Nope.
Nope.
Oh my stars! Good gracious! Who told you that?
Tell me a government imposition of freedom that happened without individuals doing it!
And here's a couple of times ol' government has helped protect freedoms.
1. Abolished slavery.
2. Nazis.
3. Desegregation.
4. Antitrust actions against the robber barons.
Those are some minor freedoms, fwiw. I know, I know, you weren't at risk so they don't count. Right?
@MegaPoke
@N. Pappagiorgio
@windriverrange
@iasooner1
@Medic007
@HighStickHarry
@aix_xpert
@Sunburnt Indian
@tlwwake
@Ostatedchi
@Soonersincefitty
@JimmyBob
@GunsOfFrankEaton
@TPOKE
@22LR
@BIGOSUFAN
@OUSOONER67
@Headhunter
@Ponca Dan
@AC2017
@CowboyUp
@wyomingosualum
@purkey
@poke2001
@Rdcldad
@okcpokefan12
@shortbus
@SoonerRedYukon101
@OSU_Orlando
@Bitter Creek
@jkosu
@Been Jammin
@Alpha Poke (we should probably leave him off the list...for your safety Sys)
@2012Bearcat
@K2C Sooner
@imprimis
@anon_xltlgbqtlmnop
@Marshal Jim Duncan
@CowboyTanker
@Cowguy
(Who am I missing?)
When's the tailgate?
KState. 9/28
Baylor. 10/19
TCU. 11/2
Kansas. 11/16
Ou game is a no-go. Point is to be civil.
So an opposing view is a disqualification for possessing or purchasing a semi automatic weapon?
