Yep.am I the only one that thinks the RJK thing doesn’t mean a whole lot for the election? He was polling pretty low and most (if not all) know this is a binary choice
Any differing opinions?
I hope you're right!!! Crazy dems won't let RFK Jr get his name off the ballot in some states..... the 'party of democracy' LOL bunch of hypocritesYep.
This one hits close to home as my wife doesn't like Trump and was planning to vote for RFK Jr. She's now 100% DJT.
I think there are a number of white suburban housewives that are looking for an alternative to the Dems this cycle.
RFK Jr. endorsing and campaigning on 'making kids healthier again' is a savvy targeted tactic to draw in a group Trump struggles with.
He could have picked any number of issues to carry forward into the Trump campaign (vaccine injury, Israel, etc) that he feels strongly about and going after Big Ag was what he picked.
Add in his running mate's TV appearances coming across as very level headed, intelligent and likeable and I think it's going to be worth a couple of points in Nov with a key demo. I'd guess real independents break 60/40 ish towards Trump because of this.
They sued to keep him off and now they are fighting to keep him on.I hope you're right!!! Crazy dems won't let RFK Jr get his name off the ballot in some states..... the 'party of democracy' LOL bunch of hypocrites
Oh the hope for more free money(stimulus checks).Kamala Harris +5 heading into Labor Day weekend.
Exclusive: Kamala Harris surges ahead of Donald Trump in latest poll taken after DNC
Big shifts by Hispanic and Black voters, young people and lower-income Americans give the new Democratic nominee momentum.www.usatoday.com
Another poll with zero bump for Kamala after the DNC. Wow.Another +5 for Harris.
Harris leads by 5 points — Outward Intelligence
Vice President Harris has a 5 point lead over Former President Trump among likely voters.www.outwardintelligence.com
"The poll was conducted nationally and gathered responses from 4,253 U.S. adults, including 3,562 registered voters."
You are the most delusional poster on this board right now. And that is saying something!Simple math is secure the elections and the left has 0% chance of winning.
That's amazing. Only 994 million behind the Elon - Trump interview.Nearly six million watched Harris/Walz interview.
Spank spank spank boy!Kamala Harris leading or tired in all battleground states heading into Labor Day weekend.
Different types of media. Not comparable. Plus, I just posted the information without comment. Your immediate reaction was hilarious and revealing.That's amazing. Only 994 million behind the Elon - Trump interview.
Gullet kamalla. Yer a gem like yer doppelganger Dan.Different types of media. Not comparable. Plus, I just posted the information without comment. Your immediate reaction was hilarious and revealing.
You are trying real hard right now to convince yourself that Trump is fine and not in danger of losing. You sound very worried.
You should be.
Ok. Elon offered to interview Kamala, she refused. Trump accepted, and that's why his audience was a billion instead of 'nearly 6'.Different types of media. Not comparable. Plus, I just posted the information without comment. Your immediate reaction was hilarious and revealing.
I've said all along that Trump won't win in November.You are trying real hard right now to convince yourself that Trump is fine and not in danger of losing. You sound very worried.
You should be.
And if Harris chose to go on that social media platform, she would attract similar numbers. Perhaps more, given the context. Again, different types of media.Ok. Elon offered to interview Kamala, she refused. Trump accepted, and that's why his audience was a billion instead of 'nearly 6'.
But you don't believe Harris will actually win. And if and when she does, you will never accept it as valid.I've said all along that Trump won't win in November.
She definitely would have gotten more than 'nearly 6'. But Elon would have asked her honest questions, and it would have been live. She needs to be protected in a sanitized environment where she can work with CNN to edit the interview then release it.And if Harris chose to go on that social media platform, she would attract similar numbers. Perhaps more, given the context. Again, different types of media.
No intelligent person thinks Kamala can win legitimately.But you don't believe Harris will actually win. And if and when she does, you will never accept it as valid.
Yes, because it is a different type of media from CNN.She definitely would have gotten more than 'nearly 6'.
FTFYBut Elon would have asked her bias, misleading, and inaccurate questions, and it would have been live.
One minute you cultists complain she doesn't do interviews. Then when she does, you complain about the interview context lol.She needs to be protected in a sanitized environment where she can work with CNN to edit the interview then release it.
Millions and millions of intelligent people think she can win legitimately. Not everyone is as delusional and brainwashed as you are. And thank goodness for that!No intelligent person thinks Kamala can win legitimately.
Spank spank spank!And if Harris chose to go on that social media platform, she would attract similar numbers. Perhaps more, given the context. Again, different types of media.
btw, we don't really know what the actual viewership numbers was for the X interview. Conflicting reports and claims.
But you don't believe Harris will actually win. And if and when she does, you will never accept it as valid.
If Elon had asked Kamala a biased or misleading question, Kamala could have called him out and answered anyway. Trump has no problem doing that when he goes on MSNBC and CNN with their hosts, but I guess Kamala didn't think she could handle a live interview as well as Trump can.Yes, because it is a different type of media from CNN.
Thus, not comparable, as I originally told you.
FTFY
She's given one interview. And it was taped. And it was with her VP.One minute you cultists complain she doesn't do interviews. Then when she does, you complain about the interview context lol.
That's because I am intelligent.Again, there is no way you think Kamala Harris can win legitimately.
I agree.If Elon had asked Kamala a biased or misleading question, Kamala could have called him out and answered anyway.
Yes, and it almost always backfires on him politically. He looks defensive, he rambles, he lies, etc. It doesn't help him politically.Trump has no problem doing that when he goes on MSNBC and CNN with their hosts
It drives you nuts that she is in control, doesn't it?She's given one interview. And it was taped. And it was with her VP.
Not at all. It makes her look like a skilled politician and leader, which is what a President needs to be.It makes her look weak AF.
Because you have already concluded in August that if Harris wins, the election must have been stolen?That's because I am intelligent.
Just come out and say it mo, kamallas full of shit!I agree.
However, if Musk kept doing it (which he probably would), and Harris kept having to correct Musk before she could even begin to provide an answer, Harris runs the risk of looking defensive. And it would be very tedious.
Yes, and it almost always backfires on him politically. He looks defensive, he rambles, he lies, etc. It doesn't help him politically.
It drives you nuts that she is in control, doesn't it?
Smart politics.
Not at all. It makes her look like a skilled politician and leader, which is what a President needs to be.
Because you have already concluded in August that if Harris wins, the election must have been stolen?
🤣🤣🤣🤣
No, that doesn't make you intelligent. That just shows how delusional and brainwashed you are.
Ok.I agree.
However, if Musk kept doing it (which he probably would), and Harris kept having to correct Musk before she could even begin to provide an answer, Harris runs the risk of looking defensive. And it would be very tedious.
Yes, and it almost always backfires on him politically. He looks defensive, he rambles, he lies, etc. It doesn't help him politically.
It drives you nuts that she is in control, doesn't it?
Smart politics.
Not at all. It makes her look like a skilled politician and leader, which is what a President needs to be.
Because you have already concluded in August that if Harris wins, the election must have been stolen?
🤣🤣🤣🤣
No, that doesn't make you intelligent. That just shows how delusional and brainwashed you are.
Kamalla can't spell comparable fool.@GhostOfMatchesMalone
This would be an example of comparable media sources.
Kamala Harris' first interview ratings compared to Donald Trump
Harris and running mate Tim Walz took part in their first joint televised interview with CNN's Dana Bash on Thursday.www.newsweek.com
Again, I'm just providing the information. No comment on it's importance or relevance.