ADVERTISEMENT

Does Anyone Know

Ponca Dan

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
Dec 7, 2003
25,737
25,090
113
The exact number of Executive Orders DJT has issued since January 20? What’s the record? Whatever the number is does it concern you that we needed that many dictates from a president, leaving the rest of our elected government representatives out of the decision making process? If you’re happy with the way Trump is handling his presidency will you be equally happy when the next Democrat president handles his presidency the same way?
 
The exact number of Executive Orders DJT has issued since January 20? What’s the record? Whatever the number is does it concern you that we needed that many dictates from a president, leaving the rest of our elected government representatives out of the decision making process? If you’re happy with the way Trump is handling his presidency will you be equally happy when the next Democrat president handles his presidency the same way?
Go read them. You search out Terrorist Propaganda so go search the EO's. They are there for all to see, most are ones the Marxists reversed when Brandon was being told what to do.
 
Go read them. You search out Terrorist Propaganda so go search the EO's. They are there for all to see, most are ones the Marxists reversed when Brandon was being told what to do.
I found one place, the Federal Register, that says he’s issued 103 EO’s since Jan 20. 103 in roughly 60 days. Almost two per day. Yep! That’s democracy in action!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Marocain Poke
I found one place, the Federal Register, that says he’s issued 103 EO’s since Jan 20. 103 in roughly 60 days. Almost two per day. Yep! That’s democracy in action!
Why do you have such a problem with our elected officials adhering to the law? We do not have a democracy, skipper, we have a representative republic. I advise you google it up before uttering such blatant canards.
 
Why do you have such a problem with our elected officials adhering to the law? We do not have a democracy, skipper, we have a representative republic. I advise you google it up before uttering such blatant canards.
Why has your constitution has separated all three branches of the govt and defined the powers each. Because the founding fathers did not want a king.
You just take the 2nd amendment seriously hell with rest of the constitution.
 
Why do you have such a problem with our elected officials adhering to the law? We do not have a democracy, skipper, we have a representative republic. I advise you google it up before uttering such blatant canards.
I did Google it and found Trump has issued 103 EO's to date. I assume from your reply you are happy with Trump's use of EO's. It's the law after all! The question is: will you defend the next Democrat president that issues 104 EO's in the same time frame, undoing most of what Trump's EO's have done? Will you defend it as an example of a representative republic? Will you defend the Democrat by saying he's merely following the law? And on a side note: are you comfortable with any individual holding the office of president having the authority to issue orders without need to carry them through the democratic process?
 
Why has your constitution has separated all three branches of the govt and defined the powers each. Because the founding fathers did not want a king.
You just take the 2nd amendment seriously hell with rest of the constitution.
What is your inference with "your constitution" referring to? Are you not a citizen of this country? Congrats on the "King" cite, you're right there. I take all the amendments seriously, especially the 2nd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OUSOONER67
I did Google it and found Trump has issued 103 EO's to date. I assume from your reply you are happy with Trump's use of EO's. It's the law after all! The question is: will you defend the next Democrat president that issues 104 EO's in the same time frame, undoing most of what Trump's EO's have done? Will you defend it as an example of a representative republic? Will you defend the Democrat by saying he's merely following the law? And on a side note: are you comfortable with any individual holding the office of president having the authority to issue orders without need to carry them through the democratic process?
Unlike non-voting commie, fascist hypocrites like you, I will support the leader of the US regardless. It does not mean I have to like their actions. You can not understand this logic.
 
Unlike non-voting commie, fascist hypocrites like you, I will support the leader of the US regardless. It does not mean I have to like their actions. You can not understand this logic.
I understand your logic, you are a citizen of a state and the state is the important factor in the equation. The irony of your logic is it comes directly from Hegel, the philosopher who influenced the philosophers who established the justification for the actions of the fascists. The state is what is real and it is the obligation of the individual to do what the state tells them needs to be done. What the individual thinks about the state is immaterial because the existence and continuance of the state is all that matters. That being your attitude it is understandable why you think what you think about the importance of voting. By the way, I’m neither a “commie” nor a fascist, two matching ideologies that differ only in how to achieve total government control. If you want to cast aspersions on me at least get the nomenclature right: call me an anarchist, one who philosophically accepts and advocates for the notion of the absence of a state.
 
I understand your logic, you are a citizen of a state and the state is the important factor in the equation. The irony of your logic is it comes directly from Hegel, the philosopher who influenced the philosophers who established the justification for the actions of the fascists. The state is what is real and it is the obligation of the individual to do what the state tells them needs to be done. What the individual thinks about the state is immaterial because the existence and continuance of the state is all that matters. That being your attitude it is understandable why you think what you think about the importance of voting. By the way, I’m neither a “commie” nor a fascist, two matching ideologies that differ only in how to achieve total government control. If you want to cast aspersions on me at least get the nomenclature right: call me an anarchist, one who philosophically accepts and advocates for the notion of the absence of a state.
Dan-O, no one casts more or better aspersions on you than you each time you occupy the keyboard. I have an assignment for you. Watch 'A Fish Called Wanda', you are the full embodiment of Otto.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OUSOONER67
Dan-O, no one casts more or better aspersions on you than you each time you occupy the keyboard. I have an assignment for you. Watch 'A Fish Called Wanda', you are the full embodiment of Otto.
The only "argument" you make on this board is to cast aspersions. One of these days you should try to make a cogent argument about the topic under discussion.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT