ADVERTISEMENT

Child detaining and separating

Removal of political dissidents...how...Hitlerian of you

That’s not true.

I specifically proposed this board crowdfunding an overseas trip for you to an Islamic country of your choice — to test their free speech laws and tolerance, while video recording your experiences.

That was after you made a blanket statement about religion.

I still think it’s an outstanding idea, and I’m 99% certain the board would happily crowdfund your trip if you upload your videos.

What are your thoughts, and does any certain Islamic country appeal? It wouldn’t have to be in the Middle East — the largest Islamic country is Indonesia, and Pakistan could be very enlightening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic
Liberals won’t be happy with it and will continue to nibble around the edges.

The most repugnant thing I saw was chuck schumar holding up a pen and saying all it takes is for Trump to sign an EO. Hey chuck you gigantic dip shit you and the rest of the losers in Congress need to tackle this and as hard as it might be for you to believe ITS YOUR FREAKIN RESPONSIBILITY! Classic example of why congresses approval rating/likability is somewhere between a human turd gravey on your 3” t-bone and finding out your wife films porn with farm animals.

Wonder how he feels about removing children, okay taking them, from parents right naming a meth lab.
 
Dude, I'm in STW once a month. I'll also be driving through Sand Springs at least twice this summer.

@HighStickHarry can watch.


tenor.gif
 
And triggered. You’ll just attempt to forget this happened later tho, shakin in your boots at the actual thought of it haha

I don't think you know what 'triggered' is.

You wanting to fight or punch everyone is an example of being triggered.

Making fun of you isn't, it's just low hanging fruit.

Problem is, your tree never quits giving and sooner or later everyone gets tempted.
 
I don't think you know what 'triggered' is.

You wanting to fight or punch everyone is an example of being triggered.

Making fun of you isn't, it's just low hanging fruit.

Problem is, your tree never quits giving and sooner or later everyone gets tempted.

I can debate politics without the need to disparage someone’s job, family, weight/appearance, etc. Do you agree with their posts, do you think they’re necessary?
 
But when I present the facts, and they’re responded to with personal attacks, does that entertain you?
When you present the facts...

Bwaahahahahahaha!

When someone posts something and you reply with "you're an idiot," is that a personal attack?
 
I don’t believe he removed any leverage.

No, he blinked.
Maybe. How do you think the public will react to Democrat challenge of his executive order? I think a bunch of fuss won't be good optics.
 
I thought this was a parody count initially it was so dramatic near the end @CBradSmith @Medic007 @HighStickHarry


This is what makes normal people ask, wtf?

There isn't any, well, this is a problem let's fix it.

It's always, THIS IS THE WORST POSSIBLE THING THAT COULD HAPPEN TO ANYONE EVER AND ITS ALL BECAUSE OF TRUMP.

Not the dipshit that's been there for how many terms?

Shiffs the kind of person you keep bumping into at a party because you dont notice a presence. He's human wallpaper.
 
Maybe. How do you think the public will react to Democrat challenge of his executive order? I think a bunch of fuss won't be good optics.

When I am asked a question about how “the public” will respond to anything Trump/MAGA does or Schumer/left does, I immediately focus my attention to those that are not Trumpets or Shumerites...those that don’t immediately run to one of the two sides.

Those people will not view a court challenge favorably for the most part. IMO, the best response available to the Dems (caveat: not my position, but the best political strategy for them) would be something along the lines of “we successfully pressured Trump to temporarily pull back from the immediate crisis he created, but there is still work to do on the legislative front. We will fight that fight on Capitol Hill, not in the courthouse.”

@HanAholeSolo2.0, this is why I say he didn’t remove any leverage IMO. I’m not sure Shumer et al are smart enough to understand this though.
 
Last edited:
When I am asked a question about how “the public” will respond to anything Trump/MAGA does or Schumer/left does, I immediately focus my attention to those that are not Trumpets or Shumerites...those that don’t immediately run to one of the two sides.

Those people will not view a court challenge favorably for the most part. IMO, the best response available to the Dems (caveat: not my position, but the best political strategy for them) would be something along the lines of “we successfully pressured Trump to temporarily pull back from the immediate crisis he created, but there is still work to do on the legislative front. We will fight that fight on Capitol Hill, not in the courthouse.”

@HanAholeSolo2.0, this is why I say he didn’t remove any leverage IMO. I’m not sure Shumer et al are smart enough to understand this though.
Thanks for the reply. I agree. The Hard Trump and Hate Trump are going to do what they do.

Where I see that Dems lost their opportunity is they are already complaining about the EO that accomplishes what they demanded. If they wanted something more, they should have been off their asses getting something done. Schumer punted a political football to Trump thinking Trump would let it go out at the 1 inch line. Instead, Trump caught it, took it straight upfield, and has decent field position. I have a feeling the Dems are going to blitz everyone and get burned deep.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT