Canadian anchor baby busted
- Thread starter CowboyUp
- Start date
I'm sure he had a shot at winning New York. By the way the cover speaks volumes to what ol Ted was talking about with his comment.
No doubt....I enjoyed the housing bust and the resulting financial crisis brought to us by New York values.
It sure does. Can't you see the overwhelming tolerance and respect for the view points of others? An example we should all follow.
This is why Foounding Fathers required the American Commander in Chief to be born "of the land."
So an alien imposter like Cruz, with secret disdain for American values, couldn't slither in and fool the American electorate.
The True American values of the NYFD Firefighters who climbed back to thier deaths in the towers the coward foreign born imposter has verbalized a visceral hatred for...
So an alien imposter like Cruz, with secret disdain for American values, couldn't slither in and fool the American electorate.
The True American values of the NYFD Firefighters who climbed back to thier deaths in the towers the coward foreign born imposter has verbalized a visceral hatred for...
That koolaid diet is going to rot your teeth and make you fat.
Do you not understand that if Cruz's campaign people had designed the cover themselves, it wouldn't have supported his statement half as well as what you just posted?
For the record, I thought his statement was irritating and smacked of getting caught up in social conservatism, which I view negatively for the most part. But the overreaction to it is ironic and hilarious.
By the way... The founding fathers placed gun rights at a much higher priority than whateverthef*** you think you are talking about. So funny when you guys try to quote founding fathers' intentions when you take a break from shitting on the Constitution.
Technically speaking none of Rubio, Cruz, or Obama would have met the definition of natural born citizen as understood at the time of ratification. All would have been ineligible. Not that it matters, just an interesting historical nugget I guess.
That cruz maintained dual citizenship until a couple years ago when he decided to run tells us all we need to know.
The Founders were very smart.
No Englishman would ever become Commander of the US Fighting Forces.
Cruz was just the kind of rat they smoked out...
The Founders were very smart.
No Englishman would ever become Commander of the US Fighting Forces.
Cruz was just the kind of rat they smoked out...
Neither would have a man with a Kenyan father not natural born himself.
Now how smart are they?
Smart on select things. Very smart. On others, dumb as shit, ancient, irrelevant and misinterpreted. Evidently.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,
The second half of that was put in to give the founding generation and those alive and currently citizens, people like Jefferson, eligibility for the office. Once the generation passed you had to be a natural born citizen. So, what was the definition of natural born citizen? We can look at English Common Law and specifically at Blackstone's Commentaries which was one of two universal guides to English Common Law. In his commentary it is very clearly defined that paternity (Jus sanguinis) is the sole guide to determining allegiance. Something the US adopted.
"Yet the children of the king's embassadors born abroad were always held to be natural subjects: for as the father, though in a foreign country, owes not even a local allegiance to the prince to whom he is sent; so, with regard to the son also, he was held (by a kind of postliminium) to be born under the king of England's allegiance, represented by his father, the embassador."
The Law of Nations by Vattel also echoed both Jus soli and Jus sanguinis in defining a natural born citizen as "those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Obviously the definition has evolved over time.
In short, if you are going to accept the new definition and progressive living breathing document theory as your justification for Obama being eligible you must do the same for Cruz and Rubio. You can't take an originalist view in one instance and not the other, nor can you adjust the definition yourself to meet your world view. This also applies to conservatives who claim Obama was not eligible because he does not meet original intent. You cannot accept that Cruz and Rubio are eligible while simultaneously stating Obama is not.
Pretty obvious he just hates hispanics.
One last thing regarding Cruz. This little fact also puts his hypocrisy on display since he claims to be an originalist yet accepts the modern definition for his own benefit.
