I believe this wholeheartedly
Breaking: Peter Strzok volunteers to testify before House Judiciary Committee
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
I believe this wholeheartedly
I think he’s probably guilty of it
It also is a clue that he has no info of “collusion” on Trump
You should, we all should, be concerned over the unlimited scope Mueller has been granted. He’s going after past crimes that have nothing to do with muh Russia
He has too much power right now
when mueller went raiding trumps attorneys office
the entire country should have said whoa
nellie
Terrifying, eh maybe for some. But I believe they want the man on the white horse yes. I don’t find that terrifying but scary in facing the unknown.
Wait. What? He didn't get charged with collusion? When is somebody gonna get charged with collusion?
Simple, they are trying to get him to “flip.”
Obviously he has no valuable information or he would have done so and received a much lighter charge.
Maybe, but never underestimate the power of fear and/or loyalty.
I’ve seen folks hold out under much more dire circumstances than this only to eventually give it up.
Well well.
What do we have here?
Now why would he call a stand down?
Perhaps an “insurance policy?”
Oh, and should we continue to question that Hillary and the Pussyhats brigade were chomping at the bit for war with Russia?
What do we have here?
Now why would he call a stand down?
Perhaps an “insurance policy?”
Oh, and should we continue to question that Hillary and the Pussyhats brigade were chomping at the bit for war with Russia?
Last edited:
True. I think, in fact, that the McDougals probably fit into that group
Don’t know yet but it’s former secret service agent Gary Byrne.
It’s real. Also it’s RICO so we have an idea what it possibly involves.
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2018cv01422/197752
Don’t know yet but it’s former secret service agent Gary Byrne.
It’s real. Also it’s RICO so we have an idea what it possibly involves.
Also it’s civil, not criminal. If Byrne wins the civil case does the potential for a criminal case increase?
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2018cv01422/197752
Defendants lol:
CLINTON FOUNDATION, CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP, MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA, CORRECT THE RECORD, AMERICAN BRIDGE 21ST CENTURY, CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, SHAREBLUE, DAVID BROCK, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, GEORGE SOROS, JOHN PODESTA, JONATHAN WACKROW, JAN GILOOLY and CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE
What are you laughing out loud at?
Here's all 210 pages of the suit:
https://ia801505.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.dcd.197752/gov.uscourts.dcd.197752.1.0.pdf
https://ia801505.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.dcd.197752/gov.uscourts.dcd.197752.1.0.pdf
I guess he thinks it’s fake news
I always snicker when he discredits because it’s Fox or breitbart but he gets his news from CNN, Voxx, HuffPo, Salon, probably even daily beast.
Name all the liberal television news outlets.
Do the same for conservative.
Where are conservatives supposed to get news?
Do the same for conservative.
Where are conservatives supposed to get news?
It's 210 pages. Before disappoint myself, what's the plot? Like book cover summary style?
I got through about 25 pages.
I get similar pleadings every other week. The only difference is the ones I get come from prison and are written in pencil.
If that gives you any idea.
Any legal pleading that both begins and ends with (paraphrase) “please don’t let them kill me, and avenge me if they do”...is a classic in my book.
I gotta give it a look then. I like train wrecks.
It looked odd on page one, and there were more oddities within a few pages.
At that point I decided my vacation was too precious to waste on 210 pages of probable frothing gibberish.
With the years of scrutiny and investigations from every angle, how can you guys not find something on the Clintons?
Two possibilities: They're either the most cunning, wily, criminals ever or you guys are delusional.
Or the system is rigged and no real unbiased investigation has ever occurred.
Do you really think laws apply to the Clinton’s, Bush’s, etc?
If you do your naivety is off the charts.
Or maybe it’s just that your prefer to be willfully ignorant because “team.”
We often hear from the left that justice isn't equally applied to all demographics. But, they don't apply this same inequality perception of justice when it comes to upper-class elites.
Because being powerful and getting away with crimes is SO RARE throughout history the clintons would just have to be “the most cunning, wily criminals ever!”
It is amazing how much in common you and cup have with president trump when you express yourselves.
