As our government regulators determine winners and losers. Hmm. I wonder what will be the determining factor. Ain’t freedom grand?
Brace Yourself For The Return Of Tariff Man
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
A concurring opinion:
Thinking About Imports and Exports - Econlib
A thought experiment, dear reader, on how to think about international trade and its impact on the wealth of a nation. Suppose one day, every country in the world suddenly said, in unison, “Hey America! We’ve decided we think you’re just the best and to show how much we love you, we’ve decided...
www.econlib.org
A third opinion is a charm:
www.theunpopulist.net
Tariffs Are Trump's Tool to Consolidate His Hold on Power
They won't only be injurious to the U.S. economy but also to its liberal democracy because he will use them to reward friends and punish enemies
www.theunpopulist.net
There is nothing in my posts or my links that are flailing. The opinions in this link are quite calm in pointing out the error in Trump's economic (political) policy when it comes to tariffs. Whether he intends it or not the tariffs will be used by politicians and regulators of every stripe to aid their compatriots and punish their perceived enemies. That's the nature of the regulation game regardless of who the regulators work for.
A third opinion is a charm:
Tariffs Are Trump's Tool to Consolidate His Hold on Power
They won't only be injurious to the U.S. economy but also to its liberal democracy because he will use them to reward friends and punish enemies
If you had a brain in your head, you would still be a half-wit. Someone throw a coin in his cup.
Dan's like that dancing monkey on the leash wearing a cap while jinglin his cup.
I believe trump inherited 12,000 tariffs when he first took office. I think Biden extended and added to trumps China tariffs, so “tariff man” isolated to trump is either willfully ignorant or disingenuous.
Choose what you want, Hary, it doesn't alter the economic fact that tariffs are bad economic policy.
How much more number one would we have been without them? Why don’t you just buy American?
Why not buy the product that most appeals to you and your budget regardless of who made it? Why stop at "buy American," why not devolve it into buy Oklahoman?" Why stop there? Why not make it " buy Tulsan?" Why stop there? Why not make it buy something made in your own neighborhood? Why stop there? Why not make it something you make yourself? Does that sound ridiculous (of course it does)? But it's exactly the same logic you propose when you insist government should force (through tariffs) every American to buy American.
Not ridiculous at all, those are all great ideas. Our country sounds like a logical stopping point though. I think based on your social score from postings here you should have to pay double tariffs.
Jeebus! Did you learn your macro & micro economics via correspondence with Gump University? If so, did you pass?
I bet the people in Guatemala think their country would be a great stopping point. Why do you think there should be a stopping point beyond the choices of free people choosing freely what products they want to purchase?
I am happy to hear you explain the error I (and every free market economist that’s ever lived) am making.
Wrong, Woody, I’m the one who claims to read and follow the opinions of free market economists.
BTW, Woody, there are no free market economists on DJT’s list because he’s a big government MAGA “conservative” who thinks he and his posse have the smarts to regulate our economy. That’s in stark contrast to the big government Democrats who think *they’re* the smart ones who know how to regulate our economy. Neither team has a clue what they’re doing but both have convinced their followers, people like you, they’re right and the other guys are wrong.
Last edited:
