ADVERTISEMENT

Blm activist threatens coup if trump elected

"I chose to bomb a federal building because such an action served more purposes than other options. Foremost, the bombing was a retaliatory strike; a counter attack, for the cumulative raids (and subsequent violence and damage) that federal agents had participated in over the preceding years"

Are you now going to state that he has a lot in common with the Black Lives Matter radicals within that movement?

Don't stop. What else did he believe?
 
Being part of an insurgency is hard and it sucks. It is a little different equation for people living in shitholes with foreign invaders than for people living in mansions and taking boats to the lake every weekend.

The likelihood of the typical republican's patriotism extending to where it could jeopardize their financial statement is about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 to 1.
 
Don't stop. What else did he believe?

You're avoiding the question. He railed against U.S. government abuse of power an a national and global level. The point is that commonality with his views could be addressed to all kinds of different people, ideologies, movements, etc. You made another non sequitur attack. We can find commonality with his foreign policy with your own views. Does that mean you are a McVeigh sympathizer, supporter of his cause, capable of the same atrocities?

The rest of his letter.

"Knowledge of these multiple and ever-more aggressive raids across the country constituted an identifiable pattern of conduct within and by the federal government and amongst its various agencies. (see enclosed) For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior. Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building. When an aggressor force continually launches attacks from a particular base of operation, it is sound military strategy to take the fight to the enemy.

Additionally, borrowing a page from U.S. foreign policy, I decided to send a message to a government that was becoming increasingly hostile, by bombing a government building and the government employees within that building who represent that government. Bombing the Murrah Federal Building was morally and strategically equivalent to the U.S. hitting a government building in Serbia, Iraq, or other nations. (see enclosed) Based on observations of the policies of my own government, I viewed this action as an acceptable option. From this perspective, what occurred in Oklahoma City was no different than what Americans rain on the heads of others all the time, and subsequently, my mindset was and is one of the clinical detachment. (the bombing of the Murrah building was not personal , no more than when Air Force, Army, Navy, or Marine personnel bomb or launch cruise missiles against government installations and their personnel.)

I hope that this clarification amply addresses your question."

Sincerely,Timothy J. McVeigh
USP Terre Haute (IN)
 
Hey lazy lying liberal @syskatine how does it feel that your only friend on here is a mentally challenged baby killing supporter named @Clinton Scott. You two should get together and go show support for the murder of babies, police officers and Americans with out trials.
 
Hey lazy lying liberal @syskatine how does it feel that your only friend on here is a mentally challenged baby killing supporter named @Clinton Scott. You two should get together and go show support for the murder of babies, police officers and Americans with out trials.

I've reported you again. If you don't stop, I'll be actively seeking a permaban.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighStickHarry
Baby-LP1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: N. Pappagiorgio
I've reported you again. If you don't stop, I'll be actively seeking a permaban.

Thanks.

I am sure what I posted deserves a permaban. Did you not say you are ok with the killing of babies? To me that is a mental midget who can't see the whole picture. You are such a baby. You spout off at the mouth and as soon as someone pushes back you cry like a wimp. I am e-mailing the big heads at yahoo about you. I have also contacted my lawyer about the claim you made that I am the guy who shows up with a gun to kill people. Lets see how this plays out for you. @Clinton Scott
 
You're avoiding the question. He railed against U.S. government abuse of power an a national and global level. The point is that commonality with his views could be addressed to all kinds of different people, ideologies, movements, etc. You made another non sequitur attack. We can find commonality with his foreign policy with your own views. Does that mean you are a McVeigh sympathizer, supporter of his cause, capable of the same atrocities?

The rest of his letter.

"Knowledge of these multiple and ever-more aggressive raids across the country constituted an identifiable pattern of conduct within and by the federal government and amongst its various agencies. (see enclosed) For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior. Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building. When an aggressor force continually launches attacks from a particular base of operation, it is sound military strategy to take the fight to the enemy.

Additionally, borrowing a page from U.S. foreign policy, I decided to send a message to a government that was becoming increasingly hostile, by bombing a government building and the government employees within that building who represent that government. Bombing the Murrah Federal Building was morally and strategically equivalent to the U.S. hitting a government building in Serbia, Iraq, or other nations. (see enclosed) Based on observations of the policies of my own government, I viewed this action as an acceptable option. From this perspective, what occurred in Oklahoma City was no different than what Americans rain on the heads of others all the time, and subsequently, my mindset was and is one of the clinical detachment. (the bombing of the Murrah building was not personal , no more than when Air Force, Army, Navy, or Marine personnel bomb or launch cruise missiles against government installations and their personnel.)

I hope that this clarification amply addresses your question."

Sincerely,Timothy J. McVeigh
USP Terre Haute (IN)


Yes, he would really relate to BLM, and probably disagree with those guys carrying AR's outside the convention hall.

I'll give you a response later - duty calls.
 
You posted my name in this thread when I hadn't even posted. Stop trolling, man.
I asked another poster a question chump. Is there some rule you can't post other posters name in threads they aren't in? You are such a tool it isn't even funny. You aren't the dictator of this site. Enjoy the letter from my high priced lawyer buddy. I guess I am not on your ignore list either? If you don't like me put me on ignore isn't that what you told HSH when you tired to bully him Mr 135.
 
I don't put you on ignore specifically for situations like this. I want to know what you said so I can report it to the moderators. Its an unprovoked personal attack against the board rules, and you won't stop.
 
I'm sure a large majority of the BLM stand for a message against police brutality...that's fine. Freedom of speech.

But, there is also a large contingent that has a dangerous tone. It not only isolates black people; it advocates violence and noncompliance with police.....furthering the problem.
 
I'm sure a large majority of the BLM stand for a message against police brutality...that's fine. Freedom of speech.

But, there is also a large contingent that has a dangerous tone. It not only isolates black people; it advocates violence and noncompliance with police.....furthering the problem.


Police aren't above the law, and much of their movement is meant to expose the vast shortcomings of law enforcement.
 
Police aren't above the law, and much of their movement is meant to expose the vast shortcomings of law enforcement.
My post didn't imply police are above the law. Most cops are good, small majority are bad.

More violence in response to a tragedy doesn't fix anything.
 
My post didn't imply police are above the law. Most cops are good, small majority are bad.

More violence in response to a tragedy doesn't fix anything.

True, it ain't the way to fix things. That said, it's part of the natural instinct for people to fight back against injustice.

I was reading the Tulsa Police Department Internal Affairs 2013 Annual Report the other night, and some of their numbers made me wanna vomit. ZERO terminations in 2012 and 2013 arising from civilian/administrative investigations.
 
True, it ain't the way to fix things. That said, it's part of the natural instinct for people to fight back against injustice.

I was reading the Tulsa Police Department Internal Affairs 2013 Annual Report the other night, and some of their numbers made me wanna vomit. ZERO terminations in 2012 and 2013 arising from civilian/administrative investigations.
I'm not a police officer and I don't have any direct relatives in the police so some of them can chime in but... did you happen to see the video from the OKC shooting? That first officer appeared to run in guns up and the situation didn't call for that IMO. The dude had a fire extinguisher. How about a taser?

To me, it's not widespread, systematic racism in the PD. I think we need better training that deescalates situations rather.

Again, I preface all that saying I'm very uneducated when it comes to police practices. That was just my observation.
 
hsh is speechless. Mark that in your diaries because I can't imagine it happening again. moderators please keep us posted on the potential permanent ban. Thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JonnyVito
Back on topic.......
I'd like to see the BLM coup trespass on our property, paper targets are getting boring. I jest I jest.
 
maybe I didn't understand the point that you were making. Its seems like you were saying that such threats were harmless.
My point is some have this fantasy vision of what their revolution would look like while being totally blind to what the real revolution would look like. It won't be the typical NRA type that takes to the hills with their guns. It will be a disaffected minority group - and the belief that that won't frack up our world is fantasy. Red Dawn was a fantasy.

 
My point is some have this fantasy vision of what their revolution would look like while being totally blind to what the real revolution would look like. It won't be the typical NRA type that takes to the hills with their guns. It will be a disaffected minority group - and the belief that that won't frack up our world is fantasy. Red Dawn was a fantasy.


If only there were some example in this part of the world where land owners and educated people took up arms against a tyrannical government.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT