ADVERTISEMENT

Blm activist threatens coup if trump elected

A coup...that's cute.

Let's see...they would do what...storm the White House? Going against the military that would be called in to fend them off?

I might be just a dumb redneck gun owner, but I fail to see how that would even remotely work out well.

I know....they are going to take Trump voters hostage...yeah...

*BELCH*...*FART*

Gawd...this is all getting so ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
"If Donald Trump becomes President, you are fooling yourself if you think we're far from having a coup our own selves. I'm dead serious." - Shaun King
Isn't that the guy who may not even be black?
 
A coup...that's cute.

Let's see...they would do what...storm the White House? Going against the military that would be called in to fend them off?

I might be just a dumb redneck gun owner, but I fail to see how that would even remotely work out well.

I know....they are going to take Trump voters hostage...yeah...

*BELCH*...*FART*

Gawd...this is all getting so ridiculous.
Wait, what? I though the whole idea of the 2A was so ya'll could protect us from the tyranny of the government ------ but you are now saying that won't work out so well? Is that because ostensibly the group rebelling is not of the great and powerful redneck clan?

BTW: Shaun King has about as much credibility and should be taken as serious as say David Duke... That he got his own thread here is giving him too much credit.
 
Wait, what? I though the whole idea of the 2A was so ya'll could protect us from the tyranny of the government ------ but you are now saying that won't work out so well? Is that because ostensibly the group rebelling is not of the great and powerful redneck clan?

BTW: Shaun King has about as much credibility and should be taken as serious as say David Duke... That he got his own thread here is giving him too much credit.
Predictable.
 
Wait, what? I though the whole idea of the 2A was so ya'll could protect us from the tyranny of the government ------ but you are now saying that won't work out so well? Is that because ostensibly the group rebelling is not of the great and powerful redneck clan?
Stereotyping gun owners is so cool. If you didn't rely so heavily on the rhetoric from moron leftists, you might be surprised that many gun owners are far from "redneck." But that would require individual thought, something the modern liberal sorely lacks. Cattle have less of a herd mentality.

You know why it wouldn't work out. A very small group of militant idiots led by a militant retard is hardly a rebellion worthy of any intelligent life form joining.
 
A coup...that's cute.

Let's see...they would do what...storm the White House? Going against the military that would be called in to fend them off?

I might be just a dumb redneck gun owner, but I fail to see how that would even remotely work out well.

I know....they are going to take Trump voters hostage...yeah...

*BELCH*...*FART*

Gawd...this is all getting so ridiculous.


Blowing off an insurgency as no threat could prove to be a huge mistake. The idea that an insurgency can't possibly do anything against a well equipped, well trained military is not only arrogant but also incredibly short-sighted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Wait, what? I though the whole idea of the 2A was so ya'll could protect us from the tyranny of the government ------ but you are now saying that won't work out so well? Is that because ostensibly the group rebelling is not of the great and powerful redneck clan?

Do you actually have any idea how difficult it would be to subdue even a small fraction of the gun owning public in this country if it came to it? I know you guys think it's laughable, and a BLM coup definitely is laughable, but an armed insurgent resistance in a country this size would be impossible to subdue. It's not a redneck clan, you elitist snob.
 
A coup by a small number of radical racists = impossible.

A coup or armed resistance to to the forced confiscation of over 100 million gun owners guns = a much, much bigger problem for the government.

Conflating the two is ridiculous.
 
A coup by a small number of radical racists = impossible.

A coup or armed resistance to to the forced confiscation of over 100 million gun owners guns = a much, much bigger problem for the government.

Conflating the two is ridiculous.

Imagine it just from a financial perspective. Taking up to 100Million tax payers away from the tax paying side of the house and put them in jails where they incur public expenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyPhil
Medic said to davidallen exactly what I was going to say, since it's just common sense.

I haven't been on here much...simply because I don't usually have the time to argue superfluous arguments. Why do I say that? Because no matter how much truth is said to a lib, you cannot shout down their inner desire to believe in lies, misinformation and utter nonsense or their impulsivity to continue to spread such detritus.
 
Do you actually have any idea how difficult it would be to subdue even a small fraction of the gun owning public in this country if it came to it? I know you guys think it's laughable, and a BLM coup definitely is laughable, but an armed insurgent resistance in a country this size would be impossible to subdue. It's not a redneck clan, you elitist snob.
Your presumption that such a cohesive group would/could ever be formed is what I question. I know your neck is only pink - don't be so touchy....
 
The fact that it would not be a cohesive group but 100's of thousands or millions of people acting in small groups or individually that would make it a nightmare to combat and almost impossible to snuff out. That is if you could get the police and military to turn their weapons on their own citizens, which I doubt would happen.
 
Your presumption that such a cohesive group would/could ever be formed is what I question. I know your neck is only pink - don't be so touchy....

Not being touchy. Just always think it's crazy that people blow off what would happen if this country ever defended back into a civil war or some similar catastrophe. For every dozen soft suburban couch potatoes, you would have at least a few legit fighters and many of those are veterans thanks to our endless foreign wars over the last 20 years. Those numbers add up fast if you really do the math. For starters there are 13 million licensed hunters in this country and that's not taking into account tens of millions more motivated gun owners who plan to stay free if the shit hits the fan. Not sure how much cohesiveness you need to see right now in order to know that would be an insurmountable problem for someone.

If indigenous guerrilla insurgencies in backwoods shit holes like Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq and so forth can routinely stymie world powers, I think my bet is pretty safe that in a country of this size, I think it's highly unlikely that one wouldn't be far more effective here.

Having said all that, it is funny to think of a BLM charge up the front lawn of the White House to attempt their coup.

A coup of any kind in America would be impossible and laughable right now, but if the America of tomorrow became a different place, you are fooling yourself if you think we are beyond the reach of civil war, rebellion etc. Nobody in their right mind wants any of that, but there are a lot of people who understand it's not beyond the realm of possibility within our lifetime or our children's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rulz and Headhunter
The fact that it would not be a cohesive group but 100's of thousands or millions of people acting in small groups or individually that would make it a nightmare to combat and almost impossible to snuff out. That is if you could get the police and military to turn their weapons on their own citizens, which I doubt would happen.

Exactly, plus - I do believe eventually cohesion and leadership would develop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rulz
Not being touchy. Just always think it's crazy that people blow off what would happen if this country ever defended back into a civil war or some similar catastrophe. For every dozen soft suburban couch potatoes, you would have at least a few legit fighters and many of those are veterans thanks to our endless foreign wars over the last 20 years. Those numbers add up fast if you really do the math. For starters there are 13 million licensed hunters in this country and that's not taking into account tens of millions more motivated gun owners who plan to stay free if the shit hits the fan. Not sure how much cohesiveness you need to see right now in order to know that would be an insurmountable problem for someone.

If indigenous guerrilla insurgencies in backwoods shit holes like Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq and so forth can routinely stymie world powers, I think my bet is pretty safe that in a country of this size, I think it's highly unlikely that one wouldn't be far more effective here.

Having said all that, it is funny to think of a BLM charge up the front lawn of the White House to attempt their coup.

A coup of any kind in America would be impossible and laughable right now, but if the America of tomorrow became a different place, you are fooling yourself if you think we are beyond the reach of civil war, rebellion etc. Nobody in their right mind wants any of that, but there are a lot of people who understand it's not beyond the realm of possibility within our lifetime or our children's.
davidallen is just projecting his "pink" onto everyone else. He'll be hiding in his closet waiting for the all clear from his government masters or his liberators. Either way, he's an excellent ass kisser and will do as he's told. That's the beauty and the downfall of the liberal.
 
Having said all that, it is funny to think of a BLM charge up the front lawn of the White House to attempt their coup.

No one will ever confuse advocates of killing cops with being Teddy Roosevelt leading the charge up San Juan Hill.
 
Your presumption that such a cohesive group would/could ever be formed is what I question. I know your neck is only pink - don't be so touchy....

How organized were the LA riots 20 years ago? Answer: Not very
How dangerous and chaotic was America's 2nd city during the riots? Answer: very
 
Why are they mad at Republicans? Maybe because the Democrats have deflected their lack of fulfillment in helping them to the right? Next thing you know it will be the Republicans fault for stopping gay marriage and abortion rights being passed .
 
BLM are idiots. Why don't they go kill the politicians that made the laws instead on blaming the police for enforcing the laws.

Johnny, Johnny, Johnny.....WTF part of "straw man" don't you get?
 
Boy you conservatives are on fire now, you LOVE discussing shooting at government employees -"Counter insurgency" and coups and hundreds of thousands or millions of people kicking some government ass. You guys love it, don't you? It's like cowboys and indians for grownups.
 
Boy you conservatives are on fire now, you LOVE discussing shooting at government employees -"Counter insurgency" and coups and hundreds of thousands or millions of people kicking some government ass. You guys love it, don't you? It's like cowboys and indians for grownups.
The only people shooting at government employees are Democrats shooting at cops.
 
Boy you conservatives are on fire now, you LOVE discussing shooting at government employees -"Counter insurgency" and coups and hundreds of thousands or millions of people kicking some government ass. You guys love it, don't you? It's like cowboys and indians for grownups.

BLM radical threatens coup = conservatives shooting at government employees

Come on man. You are getting lazy.
 
Last edited:
Boy you conservatives are on fire now, you LOVE discussing shooting at government employees -"Counter insurgency" and coups and hundreds of thousands or millions of people kicking some government ass. You guys love it, don't you? It's like cowboys and indians for grownups.
Retard alert.

26794775.jpg
 
Not being touchy. Just always think it's crazy that people blow off what would happen if this country ever defended back into a civil war or some similar catastrophe. For every dozen soft suburban couch potatoes, you would have at least a few legit fighters and many of those are veterans thanks to our endless foreign wars over the last 20 years. Those numbers add up fast if you really do the math. For starters there are 13 million licensed hunters in this country and that's not taking into account tens of millions more motivated gun owners who plan to stay free if the shit hits the fan. Not sure how much cohesiveness you need to see right now in order to know that would be an insurmountable problem for someone.

If indigenous guerrilla insurgencies in backwoods shit holes like Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq and so forth can routinely stymie world powers, I think my bet is pretty safe that in a country of this size, I think it's highly unlikely that one wouldn't be far more effective here.
Being part of an insurgency is hard and it sucks. It is a little different equation for people living in shitholes with foreign invaders than for people living in mansions and taking boats to the lake every weekend. Could there be an insurgency? Sure, but people would need a really good reason. I would wager it comes from the lower class before than middle class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDT816 and MegaPoke
Being part of an insurgency is hard and it sucks. It is a little different equation for people living in shitholes with foreign invaders than for people living in mansions and taking boats to the lake every weekend. Could there be an insurgency? Sure, but people would need a really good reason. I would wager it comes from the lower class before than middle class.

Lower class is always the larger threat of rebellion. It's part of the reason that elites support welfare programs. It lowers the risk. That's my conspiracy of the day offering.
 
Been to the Murrah memorial lately? How far do we have to dig before we find disagreement between you and McVeigh?

"I chose to bomb a federal building because such an action served more purposes than other options. Foremost, the bombing was a retaliatory strike; a counter attack, for the cumulative raids (and subsequent violence and damage) that federal agents had participated in over the preceding years"

Are you now going to state that he has a lot in common with the Black Lives Matter radicals within that movement?
 
Major asshole post. Even by your low standards.

You're getting to the point where all you do is bitch and insult.

I'm accused of running with cop killers, sharing the same ideology as cop killers, etc. but if I throw out the very obvious response, I'm an asshole. Guns is a stupid, angry, ignorance-loving, entitled dickhead that doesn't think more than bumper sticker deep. He likes to throw bombs, so he can be a big boy and defend himself. I don't gratuitously name call and accuse on here -- he does. Don't defend him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clinton Scott
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT