ADVERTISEMENT

Black Lives Matter Has Requests for You Evil White Bastages!

I read the first one and it did not provide your answer.

Sure it did. The presupposition (that people do not become politically active to stop black on black crime) your question was based upon is erroneous.

Plenty of people and groups are politically active to address this concern.
 
Sure it did. The presupposition (that people do not become politically active to stop black on black crime) your question was based upon is erroneous.

Plenty of people and groups are politically active to address this concern.
I will give you that a person from Chicago says that some small groups are concerned.

I would like to understand why there is not a national movement against it. Can you speculate why that is?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThorOdinson13
I would like to understand why there is not a national movement against it.

There is. Again, there are plenty of people and groups nationally who are politically active regarding this issue. It is also often tied into other issues, such as economic reform, criminal justice reform, gun control, etc.
 
I'm not trying to shift anything. My original reply (which prompted your original reply) was directed at a post that claimed the above article will "only grow" the numbers of white supremacists. In order to grow a movement, one has to have new people embrace the ideology of that movement.

That was the original context of my response till you started fretting over Marxism.
You are blowing ****ing minds today, genius.
 
I'm not trying to shift anything. My original reply (which prompted your original reply) was directed at a post that claimed the above article will "only grow" the numbers of white supremacists. In order to grow a movement, one has to have new people embrace the ideology of that movement.

That was the original context of my response till you started fretting over Marxism.

You know how I know you are full of shit?

Your reply to this:

Shit like this, if true, will only grow the numbers of white supremacists.

Was this:

Is this what you are hoping for?

Read an article on the web, become a white supremacist and embrace hate. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.:rolleyes:

To which I replied with this:

Read an article or hear a tv report about a black man being killed by a police officer and join a hate group. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

Followed by a response from you of:

I agree.

However, it is completely reasonable to read an article or hear on tv about numerous black Americans being killed by police officers and decide to become politically active in order to stop such senseless acts of violence.

And my reply followed:

It is perfectly reasonable for a large number of whites living in poverty to hear daily about how privileged they are and feel anger. It's also reasonable to assume that many would start to research this and find not so savory ideologies that confirm what they know, that they are not privileged and be lead to hate.

Which invoked the original claim of "reasonableness" from you:

I disagree. It is not reasonable for whites or blacks or anyone to allow their anger to lead them to embrace hateful ideologies.

And perhaps, just perhaps, some whites should take a moment and try to actually understand what others mean when they speak of "privilege" instead of simply getting angry.

Now, it is very clear following this string of discussion to whom you were replying.

Which means:

This was the original claim I was speaking of and responding to...

"Only grow the numbers" indicates an embrace.

Is proven to be:

Now you are trying to switch gears and shift the argument. You're original statement was that embracing a hateful ideology was not reasonable. @squeak never stated it was reasonable so now you are just twisting words.

And also shows:

I'm not trying to shift anything. My original reply (which prompted your original reply) was directed at a post that claimed the above article will "only grow" the numbers of white supremacists. In order to grow a movement, one has to have new people embrace the ideology of that movement.

That was the original context of my response till you started fretting over Marxism.

Is how I know:

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: squeak
Which invoked the original claim of "reasonableness" from you:

You misplaced where my original claim of "reasonableness" was exerted. It was not here:

I disagree. It is not reasonable for whites or blacks or anyone to allow their anger to lead them to embrace hateful ideologies.

But it instead, it was here:

I agree.

However, it is completely reasonable to read an article or hear on tv about numerous black Americans being killed by police officers and decide to become politically active in order to stop such senseless acts of violence.

Which was harkening back to this:

Is this what you are hoping for?

Read an article on the web, become a white supremacist and embrace hate. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.:rolleyes:

Which, at the time, you obviously understood, because you responded with this:

It is perfectly reasonable for a large number of whites living in poverty to hear daily about how privileged they are and feel anger. It's also reasonable to assume that many would start to research this and find not so savory ideologies that confirm what they know, that they are not privileged and be lead to hate.

I was talking about the reasonableness of the original claim from the start, as you clearly recognized until you started chasing rabbits.
 
Last edited:
You misplaced where my original claim of "reasonableness" was exerted. It was not here:



But it instead, it was here:



Which was harkening back to this:



Which, at the time, you obviously understood, because you responded with this:



I was talking about reasonableness from the start, as you clearly recognized until you started chasing rabbits.

This:

I disagree. It is not reasonable for whites or blacks or anyone to allow their anger to lead them to embrace hateful ideologies.

And perhaps, just perhaps, some whites should take a moment and try to actually understand what others mean when they speak of "privilege" instead of simply getting angry.

Was a direct reply

To this:

It is perfectly reasonable for a large number of whites living in poverty to hear daily about how privileged they are and feel anger. It's also reasonable to assume that many would start to research this and find not so savory ideologies that confirm what they know, that they are not privileged and be lead to hate.

Nice try. Oh, and thank you for confirming 100% your intellectual dishonesty and inability to admit you are wrong.

Pretty sure everyone sees you're not even worth engaging with princess.
 
This:



Was a direct reply

To this:



Nice try. Oh, and thank you for confirming 100% your intellectual dishonesty and inability to admit you are wrong.

Pretty sure everyone sees you're not even worth engaging with princess.

lol

Steve-Carell-Facepalm.gif


Yes, and this post from you:

It is perfectly reasonable for a large number of whites living in poverty to hear daily about how privileged they are and feel anger. It's also reasonable to assume that many would start to research this and find not so savory ideologies that confirm what they know, that they are not privileged and be lead to hate.

Was a what? A direct reply to this:

I agree.

However, it is completely reasonable to read an article or hear on tv about numerous black Americans being killed by police officers and decide to become politically active in order to stop such senseless acts of violence.

Which was a direct replay to this:

Read an article or hear a tv report about a black man being killed by a police officer and join a hate group. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

Which, wait for it.....

was a direct reply to this:

Is this what you are hoping for?

Read an article on the web, become a white supremacist and embrace hate. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.:rolleyes:

I'm sorry you have apparently confused yourself in this conversation.:D
 
I would like to understand why there is not a national movement against it. Can you speculate why that is?

Because whites don't give a shit -- they simply use it for a political "gotcha" point and aren't the least bit interested in finding a solution. Your silence when I asked for yours is duly noted and Exhibit "1" regarding white apathy except for using it as a criticism.
 
Because whites don't give a shit -- they simply use it for a political "gotcha" point and aren't the least bit interested in finding a solution. Your silence when I asked for yours is duly noted and Exhibit "1" regarding white apathy except for using it as a criticism.

Not all whites. Many whites do care and are engaged on this issue and the related issues.

But yes, you are right that many whites on the far-right consistently throw out this talking point without doing any research on its accuracy or showing any real care in addressing these issues. It is like they hear it from a talking head and then repeat it.
 
lol

Steve-Carell-Facepalm.gif


Yes, and this post from you:



Was a what? A direct reply to this:



Which was a direct replay to this:



Which, wait for it.....

was a direct reply to this:



I'm sorry you have apparently confused yourself in this conversation.:D

Last time Toon.

I disagree. It is not reasonable for whites or blacks or anyone to allow their anger to lead them to embrace hateful ideologies.

This is what you have been harping on and what you are trying to say was in reply to @squeak when you can clearly see above was a reply directly to me.

You have been proven to be completely full of shit.
 
This is what you have been harping on and what you are trying to say was in reply to @squeak when you can clearly see above was a reply directly to me.

Yes, I know what I've been posting. I'm not the one confusing myself here. And I also know who my first reply was to, which resulted in a reply from you, which resulted in the rest of the conversation. The whole conversation had a starting point. And that starting point is clear to see for anyone who scrolls up!

Now, if you would like to continue the actual conversation, be my guest. I am more than willing to continue the actual conversation. But this nonsense of re-posting replies and debating the structure of the conversation itself is just absurd.
 
Yes, I know what I've been posting. I'm not the one confusing myself here. And I also know who my first reply was to, which resulted in a reply from you, which resulted in the rest of the conversation. The whole conversation had a starting point. And that starting point is clear to see for anyone who scrolls up!

Now, if you would like to continue the actual conversation, be my guest. I am more than willing to continue the actual conversation. But this nonsense of re-posting replies and debating the structure of the conversation itself is just absurd.

You're not confused. You know exactly what you are doing with the redirection. What's absurd is you're continuing to do so when you've been completely called on it using you're own posts.
 
By the looks of things he's doing just fine.

Says the poster who believed (or maybe hoped) it was reasonable to think some random internet article would lead more people to embrace white supremacist ideology lol.
 
Your reading comprehension is on a 3rd grade level.

Your original post speaks for itself. I can understand you wanting to back away from what your originally posted now, but at least own that instead of leveling lame ad hominem attacks my way.
 
This is showing real promise as a politics HOF pissfight thread. New lib? Check. Cons packed up on him? Check. Lib not going anywhere? Check.

Hang in there, GL. Weakness only arouses contempt in their hearts, to quote the great HST.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD and GL97
This is showing real promise as a politics HOF pissfight thread. New lib? Check. Cons packed up on him? Check. Lib not going anywhere? Check.

Hang in there, GL. Weakness only arouses contempt in their hearts, to quote the great HST.

lol it is funny to watch how they all congregate together at the sign of anyone who challenges their worldview. Predictable, but still hilarious.

Groupthink at its finest.
 
Bring back the draft...some, not all, but some of this bullshit would end (can't ever do much about the government do gooders and their f'ed up attempts at social engineering and atoning for the past, although I can assure you none of them live in neighborhoods they corrupt) and lots of now dead young men would still be alive and probably have a much brighter future then they had.
 
Your original post speaks for itself. I can understand you wanting to back away from what your originally posted now, but at least own that instead of leveling lame ad hominem attacks my way.
2nd grade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThorOdinson13
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT