ADVERTISEMENT

At Least One Democrat Still Has Some Sense

Bad day for the America last crowd…


269355644_153115560383819_2764937695815782442_n.jpg
 
I was told by posters this man would fold and a man with test says they are very smart hum weird.
 
The fact that you think “most Americans” need help shows me that your world view is to be opposed and stopped at every opportunity.
I know, you have no desire to help Americans in need. You think they are losers, as you said. And that is why your hateful ideology must continue to be defeated at the ballot box.
 
Slow down for a minute. If you do, it just might dawn on you I've read a book or 2 about FDR.
Well either you've read right-wing propaganda trash about FDR or you didn't comphrend too well the books you read about FDR. If you had, you wouldn't be making the foolish statements you continue to cut/paste on this board.
 
That’s like an opinion, the old multi millionaire is a moronic Marxist and liked by few in the lEast.
Old self-hating Jews are always on the fringes of sanity
 
I know, you have no desire to help Americans in need. You think they are losers, as you said. And that is why your hateful ideology must continue to be defeated at the ballot box.

i stated very clearly that I wanted to help people in need. What you and I disagree with is the definition of need. By having a broad definition and letting the losers take advantage, it of course hurts people who actually cannot provide for themselves. That’s why I support local charity that provides basic needs.

Your brain cannot comprehend that
 
Last edited:
I know, you have no desire to help Americans in need. You think they are losers, as you said. And that is why your hateful ideology must continue to be defeated at the ballot box.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Good luck with that, toontard.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iasooner2000
Who you voted for.
🙄🤣

btw, Sanders has more power right now than your hero Trump does. Who is the real loser?😎
Oh sure, he has so much power that he got the bullshit regressive spending spree passed...

Oh wait...

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
i stated very clearly that I wanted to help people in need. What you and I disagree with is the definition of need. By having a broad definition and letting the losers take advantage
Ok then, give your definition of what separates the "losers" from the real people in need? Which of those Americans in need are you willing to help with government aid and/or intervention?
 
Oh sure, he has so much power that he got the bullshit regressive spending spree passed...

Oh wait...

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why do you constantly attack a man you voted for? Do you just enjoy being a hypocrite with every post you make about Sanders?
 
Ok then, give your definition of what separates the "losers" from the real people in need? Which of those Americans in need are you willing to help with government aid and/or intervention?

people that cannot help themselves. I told you we already have free health care, free food, rent assistance and free or borrowed college education. If that’s not enough, you can join the military and have everything provided for you for 20 years plus retirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
Are what, those who truly need help or are losers?

Give me some examples of those you think truly need help and aren't losers.

handicapped mentally or physically. Under 18 without parents. The elderly. There are obviously people who grew up in liberal shitholes that have been run by liberals for decades that don’t get quality educations or life lessons because their parents and community are immoral when it comes to raising their kids. They should join the military immediately.

Anyone over 25, with an able body has access to programs that can lead them toward opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
handicapped mentally or physically. Under 18 without parents. The elderly.
So you support then government aid/intervention going to these individuals then, correct?

For example, you support policies that will lower prescription drug costs for the elderly, correct?
 
i stated very clearly that I wanted to help people in need. What you and I disagree with is the definition of need. By having a broad definition and letting the losers take advantage, it of course hurts people who actually cannot provide for themselves. That’s why I support local charity that provides basic needs.

Your brain cannot comprehend that

Leftist don't want to help poor people; they want to enslave them to Democrats by forcing them to be reliant on government. Conservatives want to help people help themselves a completely different approach than leftist.
Hell, I'm ashamed with the way our government provides for those truly in need but because of the freeloaders we can't afford to provide the way we could. Leftist will never understand that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
So you support then government aid/intervention going to these individuals then, correct?

For example, you support policies that will lower prescription drug costs for the elderly, correct?

if there was a stand alone bill that I thought was fair and responsible, then absolutely. We are only talking about the poor elderly right? You wouldn’t support something that subsidized drugs for elderly across the board right?
 
Leftist don't want to help poor people; they want to enslave them to Democrats by forcing them to be reliant on government. Conservatives want to help people help themselves a completely different approach than leftist.
Hell, I'm ashamed with the way our government provides for those truly in need but because of the freeloaders we can't afford to provide the way we could. Leftist will never understand that.

how do you know that? Democrats have only had total control of most liberal shitholes for several decades.
 
if there was a stand alone bill that I thought was fair and responsible, then absolutely.
Why a stand alone bill? Why not a bill that also includes other assistance for those groups you claim to want to help?

Do you support extending the enhanced child tax credit? Or do you want to see an estimated 10 million children be at risk of falling back below the poverty line or slipping even deeper into poverty? Are these children losers or those in need, according to you?
 
Are these children losers or those in need, according to you?
No, but their parents are. If you really want to help children, there's no need to funnel taxpayer money to useless bureaucrats. Your local Catholic Charities or Bishop Services Appeal has plenty of ways you can help, and without other people's money, strictly with your own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
Why a stand alone bill? Why not a bill that also includes other assistance for those groups you claim to want to help?

Do you support extending the enhanced child tax credit? Or do you want to see an estimated 10 million children be at risk of falling back below the poverty line or slipping even deeper into poverty? Are these children losers or those in need, according to you?

because the other dumb shit you people put in there is ridiculous and bad for the country?

no I do not support the enhanced tax credit. Too many people will spend it on drugs. If their parents weren’t losers they wouldn’t be in poverty, but hopefully being in poverty in the easiest place in earth to be in poverty will motivate them to break the cycle as adults.
 
The State and Local tax deductions benefit all people. Want to talk about a big tax loophole look at Qualified Business Income where wealthy folks don't have to pay income on 20% of their earnings. Salt deductions help all tax payers and especially the middle income.
 
because the other dumb shit you people put in there is ridiculous and bad for the country?
Such as?

no I do not support the enhanced tax credit. Too many people will spend it on drugs. If their parents weren’t losers they wouldn’t be in poverty,
You just love repeating the right-wing's hateful talking points, don't you?

Losers who are going to buy drugs. That is every American who receives the child tax credit, huh?🙄

I tell you what, why don't you Republicans run on that in 2022. Tell American parents they are losers who are going to buy drugs with the tax credit. Please, do this. See how well that works for your party.
 
Why a stand alone bill? Why not a bill that also includes other assistance for those groups you claim to want to help?

Do you support extending the enhanced child tax credit? Or do you want to see an estimated 10 million children be at risk of falling back below the poverty line or slipping even deeper into poverty? Are these children losers or those in need, according to you?
How about the reinstatement of the SALT deductions? That sure helps out the poor, right?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
Why because I call you what you are, a fascist? Maybe I should be more prescise. You are a hateful neo-fascist. Better?
Nope. I'm not out there burning businesses down. I'm not out there banning people for saying the wrong thing. I'm not the one sending people to "sensitivity re-education." That would be your side. The true fascists. methinks thou doth protest too much, punk-ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner2000
Nope. I'm not out there burning businesses down. I'm not out there banning people for saying the wrong thing. I'm not the one sending people to "sensitivity re-education." That would be your side. The true fascists. methinks thou doth protest too much, punk-ass.
🤣🤣 You are the one protesting in every post that you aren't what you are, a fascist!

😎
 
Because there is often stuff in a bill that one may not agree with or may still be trying to have removed/amended. This is part of the legislative process. Part of the compromise process.

Sanders opposes plan to scrap ‘SALT’ cap, then restore it

Do you agree with Sanders on this or no?
And yet despite being the Senate Budget Committee chairperson, it's still in the bill that Bernie just tried to pass. You can flail your retarded dick beaters around like a wildman but it doesn't change the fact that Bernie is nothing more than empty rhetoric that you're dumb enough to buy into, toon.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iasooner2000
And yet despite being the Senate Budget Committee chairperson, it's still in the bill that Bernie just tried to pass. You can flail your retarded dick beaters around like a wildman but it doesn't change the fact that Bernie is nothing more than empty rhetoric that you're dumb enough to buy into, toon.
Again, do you agree with Sanders on this or no?

Also, did you think Sanders was empty rhetoric when you voted for him? Were you dumb enough to buy into his rhetoric when you voted for him??
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT