Once again, a completely non-scientific poll. In order to be a legitimate representative poll, the participants MUST be randomly chosen. Self-Selection participation does not produce valid results.
These are known as "SLOP" polls because they are invalid.
You want an example? Let's say the Sports Animal put out an online poll asking the question: Is ou one of the favorites to win a national championship next year (Y) or (N)? Given the make-up of the audience, what in the hell do you think the results would be? Think it may be "weighted" (biased) just a teeny-tiny bit towards ou?
My bad, earlier in the day I read on another forum that this was an online poll by Drudge.
So, I would accept that Monmouth polling is a legitimate polling organization and accept it's results. I apologize for confusing the subject.
Any comments on the percentage?
There was an online poll on Drudge asking similar.My bad, earlier in the day I read on another forum that this was an online poll by Drudge.
So, I would accept that Monmouth polling is a legitimate polling organization and accept it's results. I apologize for confusing the subject.
No, because most people like the deep state (defense, law enforcement, national security) in the abstract. They only dislike it in specific instances, like when they perceive it as being controlled by their political rivals, and in those cases their preferred political party puts up a more effective fight than the libertarians do.Regardless of whether or not the deep state is real, does the belief that it is real end up getting successfully used by candidates? Could the Libertarian party use this as a foothold?
Regardless of whether or not the deep state is real, does the belief that it is real end up getting successfully used by candidates? Could the Libertarian party use this as a foothold?