ChatGPT says, it's worth noting that the situation following the 2014 events in Ukraine was indeed complex. There were concerns about the treatment of Russian-speaking populations, and it's important to approach this issue with nuance and consider various viewpoints in order to gain a well-rounded understanding.
I would be really interested to learn about this. Wikipedia only mentions a civil war between separatists and Ukraine, and no apartheid. Can you point me to some sources that are more sympathetic to your point of view?
I'd be happy to provide some additional resources. To gain a more nuanced understanding, you might want to explore academic articles, independent analyses, and books on the topic. Here are a few suggestions:
Sorry, the first book you list was written before the time period referenced by OP. Do you have anything relevant to the discussion of Apartheid in the Donbas?
You will have to look at reporting in Ukraine as there have been reports of human rights abuse, but no investigations that are publicized. It is difficult to answer any question where it has not been fully investigated during a war or a conflict. I'm sure Amnesty International has their opinion, or the UN.
You might want to get that mind virus checked out. It's already eaten 2/3 of your brain.
Biden is not in control of anything. He's merely a puppet.
No, just that the left wing sites, like your beloved Wikipedia only use that term when it suits them.
I am genuinely curious. Does anyone that has a clue about Donbas call it apartheid? And where can I go to hear their evidence and argument? Or is this just a hamfisted what about from you?
Are you arguing that Wikipedia isn't left wing? Really? Lol you really are sheltered and uninformed.
nypost.com
Wow!Wikipedia co-founder says site is now ‘propaganda’ for left-leaning ‘establishment’
Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
Do you know how long it took the US to accept South Africa an apertheid state.Wow!
As a left wing propaganda site, I bet you could never find criticisms like Sanger's on Wikipedia.
Larry Sanger - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You'll never guess what wikipedia's other co-founder's position on this is.
You mean like having elections that control those regions while restricting residents of those regions from voting? That smells like apartheid to me. Then bombing the shit out out of those regions for rejecting the results of those elections? I get why you don't want to call it apartheid. That label screws with your party's whole anti-Israel narrative.
