ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone hear of the QAnon "The Storm" theory?

The media sure is working hard to explain Q and why it's a crazy conspiracy.

They could put this all to bed by doing one thing.

Ask the President

My goodness


And why do they care so much?

We don’t see articles going after moon landing deniers. They put it in the same realm of ridiculousness.

I swear I’m seeing new articles every freaking day.

Just ask the President and put it to bed
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerRedYukon101
Ask the President

My goodness


And why do they care so much?

We don’t see articles going after moon landing deniers. They put it in the same realm of ridiculousness.

I swear I’m seeing new articles every freaking day.

Just ask the President and put it to bed

If the POTUS was available bit a sure they would. Statements from the Administration on this question have largely been deflected thus far.

Q Thank you, Sarah. Two quickies about last night in Tampa. First of all, does the President encourage the support of people who showed up last night in these “QAnon” and “Blacks for Trump” fringe groups?

And secondly, is the White House willing to say right now, in view of what happened with one of our TV colleagues last night, that it is wrong for his most vocal supporters to be menacing toward journalists doing their jobs in a situation like that or any situation?

MS. SANDERS: On the first part, the President condemns and denounces any group that would incite violence against another individual, and certainly doesn’t support groups that would promote that type of behavior. We’ve been clear about that a number of times since the beginning of the administration.

On the second part of your question, the President, as I just said, does not support violence against anyone and/or anything. And we’ve been very clear every single time we’ve been asked about that.

When it comes to the media, the President does think that the media holds a responsibility — we fully support a free press, but there also comes a high level of responsibility with that. The media routinely reports on classified information and government secrets that put lives in danger and risk valuable national security tools. This has happened both in our administration and in past administrations.

One of the worst cases was the reporting on the U.S. ability to listen to Osama bin Laden’s satellite phone in the late ’90s. Because of that reporting, he stopped using that phone and the country lost valuable intelligence. Unfortunately, it’s now standard to abandon commonsense ethical practices. This is a two-way street. We certainly support a free press. We certainly condemn violence against anybody. But we also ask that people act responsibly and report accurately and fairly.
 
The media sure is working hard to explain Q and why it's a crazy conspiracy.

They could put this all to bed by doing one thing.

Ask the President

My goodness


And why do they care so much?

We don’t see articles going after moon landing deniers. They put it in the same realm of ridiculousness.

I swear I’m seeing new articles every freaking day.

Just ask the President and put it to bed

Ask him what?

Unlike moon landing theories, we have a noted sufferer of Trump Deification Syndrome routinely posting QAnon snippets.
 
If the POTUS was available bit a sure they would. Statements from the Administration on this question have largely been deflected thus far.

Q Thank you, Sarah. Two quickies about last night in Tampa. First of all, does the President encourage the support of people who showed up last night in these “QAnon” and “Blacks for Trump” fringe groups?

And secondly, is the White House willing to say right now, in view of what happened with one of our TV colleagues last night, that it is wrong for his most vocal supporters to be menacing toward journalists doing their jobs in a situation like that or any situation?

MS. SANDERS: On the first part, the President condemns and denounces any group that would incite violence against another individual, and certainly doesn’t support groups that would promote that type of behavior. We’ve been clear about that a number of times since the beginning of the administration.

On the second part of your question, the President, as I just said, does not support violence against anyone and/or anything. And we’ve been very clear every single time we’ve been asked about that.

When it comes to the media, the President does think that the media holds a responsibility — we fully support a free press, but there also comes a high level of responsibility with that. The media routinely reports on classified information and government secrets that put lives in danger and risk valuable national security tools. This has happened both in our administration and in past administrations.

One of the worst cases was the reporting on the U.S. ability to listen to Osama bin Laden’s satellite phone in the late ’90s. Because of that reporting, he stopped using that phone and the country lost valuable intelligence. Unfortunately, it’s now standard to abandon commonsense ethical practices. This is a two-way street. We certainly support a free press. We certainly condemn violence against anybody. But we also ask that people act responsibly and report accurately and fairly.

I know. But only POTUS can put it to rest imo.

And her non answer fueled it more
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
So...it’s relevant for discussion on this board.

COMPLETELY relevant.

So....what are we supposed to ask Trump about it.

I was referring to the media dork

Not this board

If they are so concerned as to write story after story why don’t they just do what’s needed to put it to bed?

I love Q fodder on a board
 
I was referring to the media dork

Not this board

If they are so concerned as to write story after story why don’t they just do what’s needed to put it to bed?

I love Q fodder on a board

Relevant for the media too so as long as a notably sized group of MAGA’ers hold to it.

Ask the President whether he is involved?

That puts it to bed?

It really doesn’t as long as a decent number of his supporters believe he is whatever he says.

Have another drunko.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
Relevant for the media too so as long as a notably sized group of MAGA’ers hold to it.

Ask the President whether he is involved?

That puts it to bed?

It really doesn’t as long as a decent number of his supporters believe he is whatever he says.

Have another drunko.

If Trump says it’s nothing but a conspiracy it puts it to bed.

It loses a lot of followers.
 
If Trump says it’s nothing but a conspiracy it puts it to bed.

It loses a lot of followers.

“A lot” is a completely relative, subjective. Also, as has been pointed out, his spokesperson had an opportunity to do exactly that. Finally, I just don’t see Trump clearly and expressly disavowing something like that. Not to rehash old arguments, but this is the guy that mucked up an express disavowal of Nazis and white supremacists with a “good people on both sides in Charlottesville” statement.

Given the nature of the conspiracy theory in question, which includes the theory that Trump could disavow publicly while still speaking in “code” to certain people, I don’t think it puts it to bed in any meaningful fashion.
 
Podesta Pedo alert!!!

Q has now told us that Voodoo Doughnuts in Portland is also a site of rapey child stuff. Its going on in the basement and tunnels underneath it.

Davaid Allen its up to you to go rescue them!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
“A lot” is a completely relative, subjective. Also, as has been pointed out, his spokesperson had an opportunity to do exactly that. Finally, I just don’t see Trump clearly and expressly disavowing something like that. Not to rehash old arguments, but this is the guy that mucked up an express disavowal of Nazis and white supremacists with a “good people on both sides in Charlottesville” statement.

Given the nature of the conspiracy theory in question, which includes the theory that Trump could disavow publicly while still speaking in “code” to certain people, I don’t think it puts it to bed in any meaningful fashion.

I think only the most extreme take the code route if he disavows.

Which are those BJ is referencing.
 
I don't think you understand conspiracy theories or the people who believe in them.

2018 conspiracy theorist — one of the rare people 30+ years old, with lingering trust in the mainstream media, after:


— media promises that invading Iraq would be a “good move for the American people”


— daily media assurances that Hillary was headed for a landslide election victory



601_BDDDE_3269_4_AB7_B836_30_ADB24_A25_E6.jpg



E2568394_64_FE_403_D_8122_308533800436.jpg




CFD8_C764_4_B2_B_45_C2_87_D0_EBD08_C115_A30.jpg


A395_C706_2_AB1_42_CA_ACE0_BE07_FA78625_A.jpg




Pictured below: media representative (left) with conspiracy theorist (right)


FB216_DB2_85_B1_4176_9_A31_B981650220_C5.jpg
 
I think only the most extreme take the code route if he disavows.

Which are those BJ is referencing.

I disagree...even if he expressly and clearly disavowed and called them nutty or stupid for believing it....and he is unlikely to do so IMO. He’s had the opportunity to do so through Huckabee, and she gave a notably limp statement. I’ve never known him to clearly and unequivocally do so regarding people that are probably voting for him.

Btw, where does this dude lay on your extreme spectrum?

2018 conspiracy theorist — one of the rare people 30+ years old, with lingering trust in the mainstream media, after:


— media promises that invading Iraq would be a “good move for the American people”


— daily media assurances that Hillary was headed for a landslide election victory



601_BDDDE_3269_4_AB7_B836_30_ADB24_A25_E6.jpg



E2568394_64_FE_403_D_8122_308533800436.jpg




CFD8_C764_4_B2_B_45_C2_87_D0_EBD08_C115_A30.jpg


A395_C706_2_AB1_42_CA_ACE0_BE07_FA78625_A.jpg




Pictured below: media representative (left) with conspiracy theorist (right)


FB216_DB2_85_B1_4176_9_A31_B981650220_C5.jpg

He sure seems to believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
I disagree...even if he expressly and clearly disavowed and called them nutty or stupid for believing it....and he is unlikely to do so IMO. He’s had the opportunity to do so through Huckabee, and she gave a notably limp statement. I’ve never known him to clearly and unequivocally do so regarding people that are probably voting for him.

Btw, where does this dude lay on your extreme spectrum?



He sure seems to believe.
agree to disagree

Edit: want to say one thing.

Trump stands to be hurt by not nipping this in the butt.

The following is growing daily. Regular Americans

When these people see none of the things being promised

They become disenchanted and stay home in November
 
Last edited:
Podesta Pedo alert!!!

Q has now told us that Voodoo Doughnuts in Portland is also a site of rapey child stuff. Its going on in the basement and tunnels underneath it.

Davaid Allen its up to you to go rescue them!!
Donuts are over rated Bluestar the hot spot now. The path is clear for those who open doors. 12-23-36-42. UUDDLRLRBA.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CSCOTTOSUPOKES
2018 conspiracy theorist — one of the rare people 30+ years old, with lingering trust in the mainstream media, after:


— media promises that invading Iraq would be a “good move for the American people”


— daily media assurances that Hillary was headed for a landslide election victory



601_BDDDE_3269_4_AB7_B836_30_ADB24_A25_E6.jpg



E2568394_64_FE_403_D_8122_308533800436.jpg




CFD8_C764_4_B2_B_45_C2_87_D0_EBD08_C115_A30.jpg


A395_C706_2_AB1_42_CA_ACE0_BE07_FA78625_A.jpg




Pictured below: media representative (left) with conspiracy theorist (right)


FB216_DB2_85_B1_4176_9_A31_B981650220_C5.jpg

Keep spamming this board with the same repetitive shit. The next time you post an original thought will be the first time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0rangeSlice
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT