Anthony bordain trashed the clintons and the rest is history...

[HighStickHarry]

@Been Jammin how many Clinton related murders are we ignoring right now?

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...bill-clinton-in-newly-released-interview.html

 

[GunsOfFrankEaton]

@Been Jammin how many Clinton related murders are we ignoring right now?

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...bill-clinton-in-newly-released-interview.html

Bourdain spoke of the Clintons in a way that suggests he owned personal knowledge of some of their shenanigans.

 

[Been Jammin]

@Been Jammin how many Clinton related murders are we ignoring right now?

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...bill-clinton-in-newly-released-interview.html

Be careful. Keep it up and you might end up on the list of the CDS.

 

[wino]

He's also taken aim at Trump

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/350857-cnn-host-bourdain-jokes-about-poisoning-trump

https://www.foodandwine.com/fwx/food/bourdain-trump-boycott

https://thesouthern.com/news/celeb-...cle_87b221a6-928e-57d8-839b-ed1e8d833214.html (same interview in OP!)

And Guy Fieri, too...

http://www.atlantamagazine.com/dini...rips-on-guy-fieri-and-other-food-celebrities/

Probably ought to check them out while you're at it... I'd start with the King of Flavortown. Can't trust a guy with frosted tips.

 

[HighStickHarry]

He's also gone after Trump & Kim

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/350857-cnn-host-bourdain-jokes-about-poisoning-trump

And Guy Fieri, too...

http://www.atlantamagazine.com/dini...rips-on-guy-fieri-and-other-food-celebrities/

Probably ought to check them out while you're at it...

List of trump and guy fieri murders?

 

[Been Jammin]

List of trump and guy fieri murders?

Wow. You really believe in the CDS. And, all along, I thought you were one of the more intelligent posters here. I thought you were just trolling in the OP.

 

[wino]

List of trump and guy fieri murders?

Gotta start somewhere!

 

[wino]

Wow. You really believe in the CDS. And, all along, I thought you were one of the more intelligent posters here. I thought you were just trolling in the OP.

I think he's just doubling down on the troll job.

Nobody is that dumb.

 

[HighStickHarry]

It could or could not be true. I’m not the guy who follows politics for two years and dismisses things so arrogantly.

You are like an atheist who has faith there is no god and mocks those who have faith there is.

I’m the open minded agnostic.

 

[Alpha Poke]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-16/haiti-official-who-exposed-clinton-foundation-found-dead

How many before it starts to look suspicious?

 

[HighStickHarry]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-16/haiti-official-who-exposed-clinton-foundation-found-dead

How many before it starts to look suspicious?

There is no number for been jammin. He is everything he mocks.

 

[Been Jammin]

There is no number for been jammin.

Wrong. There is a number. The number is 1.

All I want is 1 definitive murder that can be proven to be planned/carried out by the Clintons. I might even settle for them being suspects in 1 murder/suspicious death. The entire CDS conspiracy theory defies basic logic. Something that you people seem to lack.

 

[Alpha Poke]

Who doesn't have ~30 business associates that have died in accidents/suicides?

 

[wino]

It could or could not be true. I’m not the guy who follows politics for two years and dismisses things so arrogantly.

You are like an atheist who has faith there is no god and mocks those who have faith there is.

I’m the open minded agnostic.

You seem to be open only to the possibility that it did happen, and not to the possibility that it's fringe conspiracy nonsense.

Just like the pee tape and the money laundering. I'm open to those possibilities as well, but I'd rather have some kind of proof.

 

[HighStickHarry]

You seem to be open only to the possibility that it did happen, and not to the possibility that it's fringe conspiracy nonsense.

Just like the pee tape and the money laundering. I'm open to those possibilities as well, but I'd rather have some kind of proof.

I’m open to both. It could very well be multiple coincidences.

 

[wino]

Who doesn't have ~30 business associates that have died in accidents/suicides?

According to the political scientist Michael Barkun, conspiracy theories rely on the view that the universe is governed by design, and embody three principles: nothing happens by accident, nothing is as it seems, and everything is connected.[6] Another common feature is that conspiracy theories evolve to incorporate whatever evidence exists against them, so that they become, as Barkun writes, a closed system that is unfalsifiable, and therefore "a matter of faith rather than proof"

So, like I said, we better vet this guy...

 

[Been Jammin]

Who doesn't have ~30 business associates that have died in accidents/suicides?

Probably the same people who are able to murder 30+ individuals and get away with it. It is so easy to get away with murder in this day and age.

 

[wino]

I’m open to both. It could very well be multiple coincidences.

OK, fair.

Same with the pee tape and the money laundering?

What about the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Fine line between "believe in" and "open to the possibility"

 

[HighStickHarry]

Wrong. There is a number. The number is 1.

All I want is 1 definitive murder that can be proven to be planned/carried out by the Clintons. I might even settle for them being suspects in 1 murder/suspicious death. The entire CDS conspiracy theory defies basic logic. Something that you people seem to lack.

You are dismissing one pretty big thing. If you had even a small grasp of history you would realize that powerful people THROUGHOUT TIME have gotten away with things without being charged or convicted. That’s the elementary part that makes you look like your head is in the sand.

 

[HighStickHarry]

OK, fair.

Same with the pee tape and the money laundering?

What about the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Fine line between "believe in" and "open to the possibility"

All possible. I believe the Clinton murders have way more credibility than the spaghetti monster though if you really dive in and study both subjects.

 

[wino]

You are dismissing one pretty big thing. If you had even a small grasp of history you would realize that powerful people THROUGHOUT TIME have gotten away with things without being charged or convicted. That’s the elementary part that makes you look like your head is in the sand.

If it were 1 murder, it'd be easy enough to cover up. And then you'd probably spend the rest of your life realizing how hard it was to keep that 1 covered up, not create 30 more, one of which would invariably contain enough sloppy loose ends to at the very least result in a grand jury or a trial or some sort of legitimate investigation.

Can you bleed out from Occam's Razor?

 

[Been Jammin]

You are dismissing one pretty big thing. If you had even a small grasp of history you would realize that powerful people THROUGHOUT TIME have gotten away with things without being charged or convicted. That’s the elementary part that makes you look like your head is in the sand.

Welcome to the 21st century.

Where security cameras, and cell phones are everywhere. Where DNA databases and testing are growing exponentially.

The concept of the CDS is stupid. They would not be able to pull it off without making at least 1 mistake along the way.

 

[Alpha Poke]

After the 14th and 15th people croaked I was like' "Hey, something is fishy."

Then the count got into the mid thirties.

That's a trend.

 

[HighStickHarry]

According to the political scientist Michael Barkun, conspiracy theories rely on the view that the universe is governed by design, and embody three principles: nothing happens by accident, nothing is as it seems, and everything is connected.[6] Another common feature is that conspiracy theories evolve to incorporate whatever evidence exists against them, so that they become, as Barkun writes, a closed system that is unfalsifiable, and therefore "a matter of faith rather than proof"

So, like I said, we better vet this guy...

Why don’t you post your fieri evidence links and I will post the suspicious Clinton deaths and we will compare. Do you want to go that route and see if your argument is on the same level?

 

[wino]

All possible. I believe the Clinton murders have way more credibility than the spaghetti monster though if you really dive in and study both subjects.

Care to put a number on it? Like 1% chance it's true? 0.01%? 10%

 

[wino]

After the 14th and 15th people croaked I was like' "Hey, something is fishy."

Then the count got into the mid thirties.

That's a trend.

Seems like something a prosecutor would be interested in, if true.

 

[Alpha Poke]

Welcome to the 21st century.

Where security cameras, and cell phones are everywhere. Where DNA databases and testing are growing exponentially.

The concept of the CDS is stupid. They would not be able to pull it off without making at least 1 mistake along the way.

Really, did you read the IG report?

 

[Alpha Poke]

Seems like something a prosecutor would be interested in, if true.

You'd think.

 

[wino]

Why don’t you post your fieri evidence links and I will post the suspicious Clinton deaths and we will compare. Do you want to go that route and see if your argument is on the same level?

Your Bourdain "evidence" seems to be limited to he trashed them in an interview. Same applies to Fieri.

Evidence in quotes, because you don't really believe it.

Call it a push.

 

[HighStickHarry]

Welcome to the 21st century.

Where security cameras, and cell phones are everywhere. Where DNA databases and testing are growing exponentially.

The concept of the CDS is stupid. They would not be able to pull it off without making at least 1 mistake along the way.

This is just simple minded. There are things in this country that go on all the time that you don’t know about that don’t meet your child like criteria.

Do me a favor. Research fbi murders in this country and dismiss them under your criteria.

 

[wino]

You'd think.

And yet, here we are.

So why not?

 

[HighStickHarry]

Your Bourdain "evidence" seems to be limited to he trashed them in an interview. Same applies to Fieri.

Evidence in quotes, because you don't really believe it.

Call it a push.

Let’s just compare all suspicious fieri deaths and suspicious Clinton deaths and compare.

 

[wino]

This is just simple minded. There are things in this country that go on all the time that you don’t know about that don’t meet your child like criteria.

Do me a favor. Research fbi murders in this country and dismiss them under your criteria.

We should stop talking now. The illuminati may be watching.

 

[wino]

Let’s just compare all suspicious fieri deaths and suspicious Clinton deaths and compare.

Are you not willing to entertain the possibility that Fieri is a murderer? Tsk, tsk, not very open-minded of you...

I just posted a photograph of him menacingly pointing a gun, and linked to an article where Bourdain called him a douche. Bourdain is now dead. None of these things are disputable. What more proof do you need?

 

[07pilt]

Really, did you read the IG report?

I skimmed it for murders, didn't find any.

 

[HighStickHarry]

Are you not willing to entertain the possibility that Fieri is a murderer? Tsk, tsk, not very open-minded of you...

I just posted a meme of him menacingly pointing a gun, and linked to an article where Bourdain called him a douche. Bourdain is now dead. What more proof do you need?

I said let’s compare fieri and Clinton suspicious deaths with evidence. Is this getting to close to an evidence based conversation? This is usually where a liberal/emotion based brain hits the end of the sidewalk.

 

[HighStickHarry]

We should stop talking now. The illuminati may be watching.

Good one. No such thing as powerful people/entities spying on American citizens. No evidence of people saying that at all.

 

[Alpha Poke]

And yet, here we are.

So why not?

Well, we all know the law is applied fairly.

 

[wino]

I said let’s compare fieri and Clinton suspicious deaths with evidence. Is this getting to close to an evidence based conversation? This is usually where a liberal/emotion based brain hits the end of the sidewalk.

I thought this was a Bourdain death thread. You seemed to insinuate that Clinton had something to do with it. I simply offered an alternative theory.

Of course you don't believe the Clintons had anything to do with Bourdain, and of course you don't want to back down when called out on it.

Spare me the liberal ad hominem shit. I've never voted blue in my life. I like small government, low taxes and fiscal responsibility. I don't personally own a gun, but I think you ought to be able to.

I also like dots that are connected, not half-baked nonsense.

I guess I'm just not a "team player". Sorry, coach.

 

[wino]

Well, we all know the law is applied fairly.

Not a single political enemy in a position to bring the truth to light? Seems unlikely.