Always knew FISA was abused...
- Thread starter aix_xpert
- Start date
An increase of that percent, when the beginning number is low, is really business as usual for viral behavior.
Hey guys CIA plant Evan McMuffin, who ran for POTUS solely to tip the scales and get Hillary elected/lose the SCOTUS for a generation, can't seem to shut his mouth. We better listen to him this time!
FIFY Brad. Wonder why those Russians are so helpful to Biff? Why did they want Hillary to lose? Probably because they just wanted to make America great again...
I'll say. You guys always fall right in with their propaganda.
Why do you think they wanted Biff to win? I'm curious what your theory is.
That's not an assumption I make.
In other words, I allow reality, on its time, to inform me of that which I don't know.
I don't try the leftist approach of forcing reality to adapt to my perception.
Russian Twitter bots? Hahahahahahahahahaha!
Geezus this is hilarious! Hey, Russia is causing climate change too! Go get em!
Anytime something trends that libs dislike they blame Russian twitter bots.
The gullible eat it up.
They just can’t believe their views are actually in the minority.
Excuses excuses.
#MuhRussia
It wasn't me. It was those Russian Twitter Bots. You know how menacing those things are.
So you dont' accept that Russian bot farms tried to help swing the election to Biff? You really haven't read up on that, have you?
#altfacts These are credible journalists, of course you wont' believe it. Now a Rep. Ponzi? You'll spread it around and buy it hook, line and sinker!
The best part of the article (outside of Russians still helping Biff and you snarfing it up like an obedient, compliant Trumpanzee):
Democrats, meanwhile, have called the Nunes memo grossly exaggerated and misleading.
"The Majority voted today on a party-line basis to grant House Members access to a profoundly misleading set of talking points drafted by Republican staff attacking the FBI and its handling of the investigation," Rep. Adam Schiff, the panel's top Democrat, said in a statement on Thursday.
"Rife with factual inaccuracies and referencing highly classified materials that most of Republican Intelligence Committee members were forced to acknowledge they had never read, this is meant only to give Republican House members a distorted view of the FBI," Schiff continued.
A source with knowledge of the memo told Business Insider that it was "a level of irresponsible stupidity that I cannot fathom," adding that it "purposefully misconstrues facts and leaves out important details."
Schiff said the document "may help carry White House water, but it is a deep disservice to our law enforcement professionals."
Nunes began investigating the Justice Department and FBI after he traveled to the White House to view classified information in March without telling his committee colleagues. There, he viewed classified information that he said showed FISA abuse by Obama administration officials.
Nunes would neither confirm nor deny that he got the information from the White House.
"We have to keep our sources and methods here very, very quiet," he told reporters at the time. He told Bloomberg later that the information had come from a "network of whistleblowers."
Nunes briefed Trump on the intelligence, which Nunes said showed that the president and his advisers may have had their communications "incidentally collected" — and their identities "unmasked" in intelligence reports — by the intelligence community after the election.
Anything from Rep. Ponzi?
Remember, Trump is smarter than the intelligence community. He’s stable and a genius.
Man, it all has to be blamed on those Russian Twitter Bots. Apparently they are grown on farms? Right?
And seriously, why would I believe a single word that comes out of Full of Schiff's mouth? It seems that if what he claims was actually true, he and his cronies would have eagerly voted yes. But instead, "we have to keep our sources and methods here very very quiet." That from the guy who leaks so much he needs depends. I'm literally laughing out loud.
Anonymous "source with knowledge of the memo." Holy shit dude, several non-anonymous sources familiar with it already spoke about it on the record. It's not even a creative narrative and you brainless lefty windbags are breathless. This is almost as entertaining as election day was.
Yet Dems engaged in KGB tactics trying to prevent and later end his presidency.
Get ready.
Emotionally.
It’s going to be hard on you.
What do you think Flynn is saying to Mueller?
Why do you think Russia worked for Biff so much?
I really enjoy watching you guys evade these questions
The demonization of Nunes was foretold.
You lefties are as predictable as ants following a trail of sugar.
Calling you a dancing monkey would be an insult to dancing monkeys.
Kudos on your loyalty. Don't ever look over the fence.
Your response doesn't make sense, unless you have a i) confirmation bias or ii) authoritarian bent.
You also obviously don't work in analytics or a field that relies on finding insight within data.
Today, buried in all of this serious pornstar stuff, Russian Twitter Bots, NRA, and government shutdown quotes from 2013, is yet another Hildeskank drip. Somebody needs to get that fat-ass a mop and bucket.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...how-knowledge-security-problems-watchdog.html
What, like with a cloth?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...how-knowledge-security-problems-watchdog.html
What, like with a cloth?
Bastages overrode my flu shot; no one is safe from these vermin.
Sys guaranteed that Hillary would win the election.
Reality must be never ending cognitive dissonance for him.
What do you think Flynn is saying to Mueller?
Why do you think Russia worked for Biff so much?
I really enjoy watching you guys evade these questions
They got shit on Flynn.
Weak as charge.
Lying to law enforcement about something that wasn’t illegal.
Who was involved in that?
Peter “insurance policy” Strzok.
Hmm
Russia worked so much for Trump.
This is where your Dossier problem starts.
The story is Steele got his information for the Dossier from the kremlin.
So the kremlin wanted to help Trump by giving wild stories about him to Steele so it could be given to Hillary and used against Trump.
Makes sense.
You’ve have not one time acknowledged anything provided to you that is counter to the narrative dancing around inside of your little monkey mind.
You’ve been bamboozled.
Get ready.
Sharpen your mind.
The mental gymnastics you’re going to need are going to be monumental.
What do you think Flynn is saying to Mueller?
Why do you think Russia worked for Biff so much?
I really enjoy watching you guys evade these questions
What do you think Flynn is saying to Mueller?
Why do you think Russia worked for Biff so much?
I really enjoy watching you guys evade these questions
I addressed your questions. Are you stupid?
I clicked on the picture and it says that almost all of the stuff in the dossier (which I still don't understand why it's so important) is from Kremlin sources. That's simply not true -- the dossier has lots of stuff that plainly didn't come from the Kremlin, like Don Jr's meeting and the money laundering.
I'll go through your frantic sentence fragments and try to dig out the answers later on. IN the meanwhile, I really admire your passion and energy you're putting into all this, Comrade. The Premiere will have a special place of honor for you!
Nunes is such a bitch -- I can't believe anyone takes him seriously after the first stunt blew up in his face. Did you think the first Nunes bombshell was on the level of Watergate, too?
Last: This shit is fun. I love watching these criminals run for the shadows and cook up these schemes to stop the Russia investigation! Karma, bitches!
@syskatine
Aren't you a lawyer by trade or some such nonsense?
What in the hell are you even doing here? Because it looks like you are assigning causality.
Anybody with a remedial knowledge of statistics knows "that's not how it works."
Since I know you're not a "significance" adherent, then what in the legal minded space are you attempting to do?
Aren't you a lawyer by trade or some such nonsense?
What in the hell are you even doing here? Because it looks like you are assigning causality.
Anybody with a remedial knowledge of statistics knows "that's not how it works."
Since I know you're not a "significance" adherent, then what in the legal minded space are you attempting to do?
