Whose to say if he was talking to or about you anyway ?
Like his EvIdEnCe of Trumps Russia Collusion. Nah an Attorney wouldn't lie. 🤣🤣🤣Has exactly zero percent chance of passing....maybe less.
Just another idiotic piece of political grandstanding.
Gridlock in many cases, is a very good thing.
Was the NSG/BSG (LSG) equally as vocal when the left was saying building a wall at the Southern Border was Racist? What about the Cages they accused Trump of when in fact Obama and Biden built them?Not exactly sure how introducing legislation is "Commie stuff", but you do you.
PTSD is tearing you up.Was the NSG/BSG (LSG) equally as vocal when the left was saying building a wall at the Southern Border was Racist? What about the Cages they accused Trump of when in fact Obama and Biden built them?
Muh Russia Collusion? Fisa Warrants? I could go on and on but you get my drift.
Keep doing you BSG/NSG (LSG) 🤡🤣
Yet no indictments for a treasonous coup anywhere in sight?
I was guaranteed indictments for this treasonous coup.
I want my indictments.
There is that.You mean the doj isn’t going to prosecute themselves when they all agree they would do it again under the same cover?
Oh Harry now you're just mimicking arguments your cohorts have already made.You mean the doj isn’t going to prosecute themselves when they all agree they would do it again under the same cover?
Didn't Durham indict some folks and try them?
Yes he did.
Couldn't he at least recommend charges against treasonous coup participants if not prosecute them himself?
Yes he could.
What amazes me is how board Trumpies guaranteed me that Durham would sweep in like an avenging angel and convict all these treasonous coup participants and put them in jail for the rest of their treasonous lives.
Yet he doesn't even recommend further charges for anyone.
And now you and yours are left with strawman arguments claiming that "Democrats" are accepting of this when no one is actually saying that.
Durham ended up with a report that actually pisses off both sides. That indicates to me that it's a pretty fair report. Both "sides" have tried to politicize the justice system and the intelligence/law enforcement agencies of the executive branch.....your side has done it and continues to do it.....2 Cents and Cups side has done it and continues to do it.
Both you and your cohorts and 2 Cents and his cohorts are okay with it when it's your guys and reeee! when it's their guys. Two sides of the same coin....both pawns.
Oh Harry now you're just mimicking arguments your cohorts have already made.
So I will just quote my previous response to it.
LMAO. None of the Trump people were prosecuted for anything related to Trump or Russian Collusion. The DOJ/FBI and the rabid Anti-Trump investigators searched for anything in their targets past, going so far as to entrap a couple in order to punish them for associating with Trump. Durham wasn't focused on punishing people associated with the soft coup attempt, he was focused on informing the American people of why and how the investigation was started. It's disingenuous at best to try and use the Durham Report's lack of referrals for prosecution as some kind of exoneration but you already knew that.Oh Harry now you're just mimicking arguments your cohorts have already made.
So I will just quote my previous response to it.
Harry approves forum shopping contrary to venue laws?Bsg likes a Washington DC jury that is guaranteed to be 90% left wing loons? Doesn’t seem very bsg but contrarian overrides that so I get it.
JD is not wrong here. Packing the court right now is political grandstanding and no matter how much legislation is passed in the Senate, it will never make into debate in the house. It goes nowhere and is thus just rhetoric.Has exactly zero percent chance of passing....maybe less.
Just another idiotic piece of political grandstanding.
Good post.JD is not wrong here. Packing the court right now is political grandstanding and no matter how much legislation is passed in the Senate, it will never make into debate in the house. It goes nowhere and is thus just rhetoric.
This is where the Democrats are so much better at using their platform to make Republicans look stupid. Every time you see a split congress Democrats will file all the crazy legislation that their cooky leftists want so they can turn around to them and say we passed legislation but those darn Republicans. Knowing full well that the bill will never make out of committee let alone the other house in congress. These same bills will never make it to committee if Dems control both sides, as they know these things are not popular at all and passing them would be more harmful than good. However, what they can do is test the public to see how far out of mainstream they are. If it surprises them by being mildly supported, they will try to get in the next time they hold both houses.
With that being said Dems are testing the waters to see what kind of support they can gen up. If they get anywhere close to 40% popular support expect an attempt to ram this through as soon as they have both houses (as long as a republican isn't President at the time). This also shows the Dems biggest weakness in that they never consider the "and then what" when republicans replace them in power. Thats how they lost the SCOTUS.
Dead to rights, Schiff is a lying POS and should be forced to resign in disgrace but Democrat voters will reward him by voting for him to be a Senator. Tells you all you need to know about Democrat voters.
With Democrats shouting from the roof tops "No One Is Above The Law" shouldn't they be screaming for Schiff to be held accountable?This is worse than Watergate.
The only difference? Dems aren't honest and they don't really care for our country.
Neither are the "professionals" in the press not interested in being fair and unbiased.
Both this and Watergate pale in comparison to the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964. So at least we have that going for us.This is worse than Watergate.
The only difference? Dems aren't honest and they don't really care for our country.
Neither are the "professionals" in the press not interested in being fair and unbiased.
Feel for anyone that supports the guy.
You right-wingers sure are helping Schiff out.
What laws did Durham say were broken and what new criminal charges did he recommend?With Democrats shouting from the roof tops "No One Is Above The Law" shouldn't they be screaming for Schiff to be held accountable?
I don't necessarily disagree that it is somewhat political grandstanding, but so what?JD is not wrong here. Packing the court right now is political grandstanding and no matter how much legislation is passed in the Senate, it will never make into debate in the house. It goes nowhere and is thus just rhetoric.
And Republicans don't do the same thing?This is where the Democrats are so much better at using their platform to make Republicans look stupid. Every time you see a split congress Democrats will file all the crazy legislation that their cooky leftists want so they can turn around to them and say we passed legislation but those darn Republicans. Knowing full well that the bill will never make out of committee let alone the other house in congress.
According to some polls, this already has the support of more than 40% of Americans.If they get anywhere close to 40% popular support expect an attempt to ram this through as soon as they have both houses (as long as a republican isn't President at the time).
And you left nut wings swallow what he gives you to swallow. 🤣You right-wingers sure are helping Schiff out.
I'm not the one quoting his tweets and obsessing over him right now.And you left nut wings swallow what he gives you to swallow. 🤣
Sure SkittlesI'm not the one quoting his tweets and obsessing over him right now.
But hey, you keep doing you. He is definitely counting on it.
I don't necessarily disagree that it is somewhat political grandstanding, but so what?
Democrats have every right to show the American people what they support or would support, just as Republicans do. Both chambers should vote on the measure and let the people see where their representatives stand before the 2024 election.
And Republicans don't do the same thing?
This is politics man.
According to some polls, this already has the support of more than 40% of Americans.
The republican answer to this should beI don't necessarily disagree that it is somewhat political grandstanding, but so what?
Democrats have every right to show the American people what they support or would support, just as Republicans do. Both chambers should vote on the measure and let the people see where their representatives stand before the 2024 election.
No shit sherlock, you just catching on, how cute.And Republicans don't do the same thing?
This is politics man.
And the reason you have not seen this brought out yet is because the Dems know it's closer to 25% and that would be generous. Although you should let me know what polls say 40% so I can write them off.According to some polls, this already has the support of more than 40% of Americans.
What laws did Durham say were broken and what new criminal charges did he recommend?
You just make this too easy sometimes.
I'm not the one quoting his tweets and obsessing over him right now.
But hey, you keep doing you. He is definitely counting on it.
At least two of them purport to be lawyers. God help their victims, er, clients.
Schitt and you lefties have been obsessing over Trump and Muh Russia for how many yrs now? But keep saying we are obsessing over Schitt's lies while you ignore them Dear Party Fan Boi. 🤣I'm not the one quoting his tweets and obsessing over him right now.
But hey, you keep doing you. He is definitely counting on it.
Will have to check it out, maybe.O/T 67 or anyone else, your work is needed over at MCConnells badly