ADVERTISEMENT

About that popular vote claim....

Do I have to name them for them to exist? Don't be daft.

I guess you are who I was talking about. "Conservatives don't/wouldn't do that. It's only the Democrats".

It is soooo simple. No illegal voting equals fair voting equals let the chips fall where they may. That simple. If you can not get on board with that? Only conclusion I have is the following:

1. You see illegal voting as good for Dems
2. We KNOW illegal voting exists, it is a variable we should not have and it should be stopped. Do you believe in russian interference in our last election which is yet to be proven, and if true should it be stopped? The answer to both of these questions is a simple yes, but one the Dems appeared to be hypocritical on, even conflicted. Makes no sense, none.
 
Do I have to name them for them to exist? Don't be daft.

I guess you are who I was talking about. "Conservatives don't/wouldn't do that. It's only the Democrats".

Who is trying desperately to keep as many illegals out of this country as possible and who is trying desperately to make sure we have the same immigration policy we had as a military policy in Vietnam? Answer that.

Who wants there to be no identification required to vote but has no problem being forced to have an id for everything else under the sun? Which group wants a legal id as a requirement to vote?

Without even going into tactics on Election Day which you haven’t studied since you decided to splash your robust opinions in on politics 2 years ago. You don’t have common sense if you don’t see what is motivating this. It’s very frustrating knowing this is not obvious to you. Syskatine knows the game. Cup knows the game. They want the illegal vote and thinks it’s a wink wink when they do.

Your position is just broken and I don’t get it.
 
It is soooo simple. No illegal voting equals fair voting equals let the chips fall where they may. That simple. If you can not get on board with that? Only conclusion I have is the following:

1. You see illegal voting as good for Dems
2. We KNOW illegal voting exists, it is a variable we should not have and it should be stopped. Do you believe in russian interference in our last election which is yet to be proven, and if true should it be stopped? The answer to both of these questions is a simple yes, but one the Dems appeared to be hypocritical on, even conflicted. Makes no sense, none.

I can only speak for myself.

I don't want illegal voting.
I don't think it is close to as much of a problem as Trump, FOXnews, and many Cons make it out to be.
I'm not at all opposed to changes to voting laws that reduce the chances of illegal voting.
I never said I didn't think it happens or that I want it to continue.

If it is happening, it is happening on both sides. The idea that the popular vote discrepancy was due to massive illegal voting by Dems, when there wasn't offsetting illegal voting on the other side defies logic. Yet, you, and others on this board buy into it wholeheartedly.

I'm not getting into Russian interference. Different topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoblock
Who is trying desperately to keep as many illegals out of this country as possible and who is trying desperately to make sure we have the same immigration policy we had as a military policy in Vietnam? Answer that.

Who wants there to be no identification required to vote but has no problem being forced to have an id for everything else under the sun? Which group wants a legal id as a requirement to vote?

Without even going into tactics on Election Day which you haven’t studied since you decided to splash your robust opinions in on politics 2 years ago. You don’t have common sense if you don’t see what is motivating this. It’s very frustrating knowing this is not obvious to you. Syskatine knows the game. Cup knows the game. They want the illegal vote and thinks it’s a wink wink when they do.

Your position is just broken and I don’t get it.
tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighStickHarry
If conservatives truly sought fair elections.....there would be no such thing as voter suppression and unlawful voter ID tactics, specifically to target the black vote.

North Carolina had to admit it to US 4th District Court of Appeals...we still don’t have that Rep seat election verified.
 
If conservatives truly sought fair elections.....there would be no such thing as voter suppression and unlawful voter ID tactics, specifically to target the black vote.

North Carolina had to admit it to US 4th District Court of Appeals...we still don’t have that Rep seat election verified.
Tell me more about how IDs target races?
 
Voter Id’s would solve the problem, no matter how large or small.
The people in the OP all have drivers licenses that match a name on the voter rolls. Hard to see how and ID requirement solves the "problem."
 
Do you believe the disenfranchisement of the black vote by Republicans is a morally/ethically good thing?

You are just hook line and sinker on this dumb shit. If you go back I already blew you out of the water on that North Carolina report.
 
Just to be clear, are you saying voter ID’s don’t work? And if not, is your benchmark for success a 100% filtering of illegal voters?
Yes I am saying voter IDs don't prevent the issue that you brought up in your OP. My benchmark would be preventing even one of the 58,000 people cited from voting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: toontown
Purge ALL voter roles and make everyone re-register.
Require proper identification to register and cast a vote.
Require proof of citizenship for all census returns that count towards House of Representatives allocation.
This, but for guns
 
  • Like
Reactions: toontown
Purge ALL voter roles and make everyone re-register.
Require proper identification to register and cast a vote.
Require proof of citizenship for all census returns that count towards House of Representatives allocation.

Punishing registered voters for others’ misdeeds? Sounds like...disenfranchisement ***shrugs shoulders***
 
Unprovoked ad hominems, no substance, no argument otherwise.

“Hopeless”

Oh poor toon. I’ll say this one last time. My argument is here somewhere. I’m assuming you ran and hid like you always do but if you thought you had a chance of challenging me you would have already found it.
 
Oh poor toon. I’ll say this one last time. My argument is here somewhere. I’m assuming you ran and hid like you always do but if you thought you had a chance of challenging me you would have already found it.

Find it and prove me wrong lol...it’s quite clear your fear of the reality of the truth is preventing you from showing your hand ***shrugs shoulders***

If you can effectively outduel the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, I’m all ears and seriously impressed.

Step up and show this bigtime argument you made...
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT