What we have so far:
So far all CNN has found was that Trump thought he'd be ****ed by the appointment of a special counsel who would hinder his presidency for 'years and years'.
Trump requested actions that could have amounted to obstruction but those actions were not acted upon by his subbordinates (and thus obstruction didn't occur).
Mueller couldn't prove that Sessions committed perjury due to ambiguous phrasing of questions.
Mueller couldn't prove campaign violations following the Russia Trump Tower meeting.
Anything legal I've missed?
So far all CNN has found was that Trump thought he'd be ****ed by the appointment of a special counsel who would hinder his presidency for 'years and years'.
Trump requested actions that could have amounted to obstruction but those actions were not acted upon by his subbordinates (and thus obstruction didn't occur).
Mueller couldn't prove that Sessions committed perjury due to ambiguous phrasing of questions.
Mueller couldn't prove campaign violations following the Russia Trump Tower meeting.
Anything legal I've missed?