ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

Wow maybe the medical establishment is catching up....

T
Pancreek1 said:
answer is economics. Again, until someone funds an FDA clinical trial, it’s illegal to prescribe. And nobody has ever done such with off patent molecules. A 350M cost for low margin generic product.

The one party that would have a near immediate payback is the US Government (Medicare). I’m working on that
Click to expand...

That makes sense. I didn’t even consider the “legality” aspect of the whole situation. Thanks!
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: AC2020

Wow maybe the medical establishment is catching up....

O
Pancreek1 said:
answer is economics. Again, until someone funds an FDA clinical trial, it’s illegal to prescribe. And nobody has ever done such with off patent molecules. A 350M cost for low margin generic product.

The one party that would have a near immediate payback is the US Government (Medicare). I’m working on that
Click to expand...
There are billions in grants available for off patent trials for promising cures - you can't blame it on pharmaceutical companies.
Click to expand...

Wow maybe the medical establishment is catching up....

Pancreek1
tcpoke said:
I don’t have anything close to enough information, much less knowledge, on the subject at hand to have any sort of opinion in all of this.

My question is why isn’t MD Anderson (or any of the other institutions you’ve discussed) shouting from the mountain tops about this?
Click to expand...
answer is economics. Again, until someone funds an FDA clinical trial, it’s illegal to prescribe. And nobody has ever done such with off patent molecules. A 350M cost for low margin generic product.

The one party that would have a near immediate payback is the US Government (Medicare). I’m working on that
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: AC2020
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back