Just dropped first two episodes, looks interesting. It is based on a Steven King book or something SK.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have the book but I haven’t read it yet. My wife got it for me and she read it and thoroughly enjoyed it. It’s still in my queue.Haven't read the book. Watched the first two episodes last night. Very good. I'm hooked.
I am hooked can't wait for tonight's episode. I read the Mr. Mercedes books and loved them. I didn't care for the TV series as much. I haven't read The Outsider but may read it after this series is over.
It's pretty much been great since episode 1. Love all those characters outside the overwrought widow.
Didn't realize Homeland is still on. That show lost me after season 2. Drove me crazy that Patinkin's character would always tell Danes what she should do, and then she would do the exact opposite and never get reprimanded for disobeying direct orders.
Tough crowd.
I see the GOT online criticism spawned a real monster--full-time armchair TV critics.
Your ancestors would wander into the caves after the charcoal craftsmen had done their finest work, and complain about the horns on the bull or the length of the warrior's spear.We have been around since the dawn of time.
Your ancestors would wander into the caves after the charcoal craftsmen had done their finest work, and complain about the horns on the bull or the length of the warrior's spear.
Agreed. Disappointing. Also I think in that situation you’d be doing full body exams on everyone just to make sure no one got scratched.
To show that there's another example of an evil doppelganger, like Terry's.I don't think it mattered if they were scratched since the evil creature was dead. He could imitate someone he scratched, but once he was dead, they didn't have to worry about doppelgangers of them suddenly appearing.
Explain something to me about the ending. What convinced the DA that Terry Maitland was innocent? Why send him a video of Claude's doppelganger trying to take a kid? Wouldn't he just think Claude was the one who did it?
To show that there's another example of an evil doppelganger, like Terry's.
1). How does that show what you say? It is one video, with no confirmation that Claude had an alibi. (the viewer knows he did, but there is no indication that the DA had that information).
2). Why did Ralph's wife go to Glory and make it clear that she can't say anything about there being an evil doppelganger?
3). They all agreed to make a plan to tell the story of what killed Jack, Howie, Claude's brother, etc, which did not include the evil doppelganger. Ralph even says something like "we all need to get on the same page if we are going to pull this off". Then, they go to the D.A. and make sure he knows about the evil doppelganger in order to get Maitland off. How does that make any sense?
I don't think it mattered if they were scratched since the evil creature was dead. He could imitate someone he scratched, but once he was dead, they didn't have to worry about doppelgangers of them suddenly appearing.
Explain something to me about the ending. What convinced the DA that Terry Maitland was innocent? Why send him a video of Claude's doppelganger trying to take a kid? Wouldn't he just think Claude was the one who did it?
Is it dead? I mean if a shotgun blast and stalagmite through the chest didn’t kill it would a rock to the head? Why did they do the dramatic mid credit scene if it doesn’t mean anything?
Also, why not just seal off the cave? No need to chase it just let it starve.
My wife and I agree.
More room and rations on the bandwagon for me and mine with you lot jumping ship to fend for yourselves.My wife and I agree.