ADVERTISEMENT

Meltdowns On Fox News

Apparently you do.

But hey, you got to defend your dear leader and hateful ideology at all costs, don't you? Have fun being a pawn.
No. You haven’t cited any specific language by Trump inciting people to riot. It certainly isn’t in the lengthy paragraphs you quoted. That is why the overwhelming majority of this board sees you for the dumbfvck that you are.
 
But these are...

"Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that's what this is all about. And to use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with: We will stop the steal."

"Anyone you want, but I think right here, we're going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated."

"So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we're going to the Capitol, and we're going to try and give. The Democrats are hopeless — they never vote for anything. Not even one vote. But we're going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help. We're going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."

Just a few quotes there. Talk of "taking our country back," "show strength not weakness," etc.

Add that to the lies and misinformation he was feeding his supporters (from the moment he lost the election) and it clear to see Trump fomented the insurrection. He wanted his supporters to "take back our country" by marching to the Capitol and showing strength. And they thought they were doing just that when they attacked our Capitol.

Also, you want to talk about all those who have been arrested who have stated that they were doing what they thought Trump wanted them to do? I guess they are all lying now, huh?🙄

As usual, you are flat out wrong in your defense of your dear leader. At least be honest for once and admit what your dear leader did. The man fomented an insurrection with his lies and rhetoric. He is a traitor.

And your hero Lil Debs said this:
See any similarities? I sure do.

"Capitalism Doomed

Capitalism is rushing blindly to its impending doom. All the signs portend the inevitable breakdown of the existing order. Deep-seated discontent has seized upon the masses. They must indeed be deaf who do not hear the mutterings of the approaching storm.

Poverty, high prices, unemployment, child slavery, widespread misery and haggard want in a land bursting with abundance; prostitution and insanity, suicide and crime, these in solemn numbers tell the tragic story of capitalism’s saturnalia of blood and tears and shame as its end draws near.

It is to abolish this monstrous system and the misery and crime which flow from it in a direful and threatening stream that the Socialist party was organized and now makes its appeal to the intelligence and conscience of the people. Social reorganization is the imperative demand of this world-wide revolutionary movement.

The Socialist party’s mission is not only to destroy capitalist despotism but to establish industrial and social democracy. To this end the workers are steadily organizing and fitting themselves for the day when they shall take control of the people’s industries and when the right to work shall be as inviolate as the right to breathe the breath of life.

Standing as it does for the emancipation of the working class from wage-slavery, for the equal rights and opportunities of all men and all women, for the abolition of child labor and the conservation of all childhood, for social self-rule and the equal freedom of all, the Socialist party is the party of progress, the party of the future, and its triumph will signalize the birth of a new civilization and the dawn of a happier day for all humanity."

Source: Eugene Debs, “Speech of Acceptance,” International Socialist Review (October, 1912).
 
No. You haven’t cited any specific language by Trump inciting people to riot. It certainly isn’t in the lengthy paragraphs you quoted. That is why the overwhelming majority of this board sees you for the dumbfvck that you are.
His recitation of probable cause is as empty as his head. Robots gonna robot.
 
You haven’t cited any specific language by Trump inciting people to riot
🤣🤣

And your defense of your dear leader's and his riot blindly continues.

btw, the vast majority of voters on this board are crazy right-wingers like yourself. I don't expect them to agree with my comments. They are pawns in Trump's dangerous game, just like you are.

Heck, even @OUSOONER67 admitted he was worthless scum. But he still supports the worthless scum!🤣
 
Last edited:
You’re a liar.
you-mad-u-mad.gif


🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
🤣🤣

And your defense of your dear leader's and his riot blindly continues.

btw, the vast majority of voters on this board are crazy right-wingers like yourself. I don't expect them to agree with my comments. They are pawns in Trump's dangerous game, just like you are.

Heck, even @OUSOONER67 admitted he was worthless scum. But he still supports the worthless scum!🤣
Just pointing out that you haven’t proven any wrongdoing. But hell yes, I’ll always defend free enterprise against marxist punks like you. Common decency demands it.
 
@my_2cents

I have made a decision to ignore you for a while. I think it’s fair to tell you this in advance so you’ll know why I’m not answering you any longer.

There are several liberals on the board that I enjoy bantering with. They are honest people who believe differently than I do on many subjects. I enjoy these people. We make an effort to understand each other and they can admit when their side comes up short on something. I can admit when my side fails to meet my expectations.

You are not one of these people. You are incapable of an honest discussion.

I find it hard to believe that you’re a lawyer. Lawyers are among my favorite people. The successful lawyers possess something that you do not: the ability to understand the opposing point of view and to craft an argument to persuade.

Why are you here? What is your connection to Oklahoma? Are you here as a political plant? Did the Daily Kos send you here?

Anyway, I don’t wish any harm to come upon you. It’s not like that. Whatever anger I had has dissipated. But I get to choose who I spend time with and I’m choosing to not spend any more time with you.

I apologize for the rude things I have said to you. You can choose to forgive or not. Your call. But I think it’s pointless to continue until some time passes by.

Good night.
 
Why are you here? What is your connection to Oklahoma? Are you here as a political plant? Did the Daily Kos send you here?
🤣🤣🤣

I apologize for the rude things I have said to you. You can choose to forgive or not. Your call.
No need to apologize. This is a message board. Nothing said on here hurts my feelings. Nor do I allow myself to get angry over comments from someone who doesn't know me personally.
 
Last edited:
Back to the Garland contradictions you go. Like a good little Carlson follower.

Are you paying attention to the select committee's investigation besides what Carlson tells you about it?
You mean the emails Lying Adam edited to say something they didn’t? Yea I saw that, did you? Seems to me if Democrats had such a strong case, as you say, they wouldn’t have to lie to make it, but that’s different, right?
 
Last edited:
You are never going to accept any proof of wrongdoing on the part of your deal leader. The truth is staring you right in the face, yet you continue on believing lies.
I’ve asked you to cite the specific words where Trump incited the riot. So far, all you’ve cited is “muh.....,Pennsylvania Avenue.....peacefully protest.......yada yada yada”. That is the polar opposite of inciting a riot. You are so blinded by your desire for a Stalinesque purge of conservatism that you can’t see the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC2020
You mean the emails Lying Adam edited to say something they didn’t? Yea I saw that, did you? Seems to me if Democrats had such a strong case, as you say, they wouldn’t have to lie to make it, but that’s different, right?
What up with that? Why do the democrooks need to fabricate evidence?
I am assuming you both are speaking about the text, and once again, you both prove my point. You have received misinformation from Fox News and other right-wing propagandists without attempting to actually research the issue yourself.

And considering you are a lawyer fascistinlouisiana, it is ridiculous to see you claim there was fabricated evidence, when that clearly was not the case. You should know better. But heck, you didn't even know what the law was in Louisiana, so I'm not really surprised.

There was no fabrication of evidence. Take a moment and actually read the truth instead of what Fox News tells you...

Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan Jan. 6 Evidence in Meadows Hearing?

"There is absolutely no validity to the complaints about the way this text was excerpted during the House debate on holding Meadows in contempt," argued Norm Eisen, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who was co-counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment of Donald Trump.

The fact that a period was inserted, possibly inadvertently, instead of an ellipsis on a graphic presentation is irrelevant. The use of a period versus an ellipsis doesn't change the meaning of the deeply troubling and false statement that the vice president should tamper with electoral votes," Eisen told Newsweek in an email.
"
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AC2020
I’ve asked you to cite the specific words where Trump incited the riot.
And I have. Again, you are never going to accept anything that is the truth concerning your dear leader and the role he played in the insurrection.

You are so blinded by your desire for a Stalinesque purge of conservatism that you can’t see the truth.
I have no desire to "purge" conservatism. I do, however, strongly oppose fascists like Trump and yourself. I also oppose attacks on our Capitol as well, as do most Americans who aren't part of the Trump cult.
 
so schiff didn’t alter the text. He just read an altered text into the record.
Did you even read the article I linked to?

There was no fabrication of evidence. This is, as usual, a much ado about nothing from right-wing propagandists who are trying to get you and other Trump pawns to ignore what is being revealed. It was a distraction and you guys, as usual, ate it up.

The question remains, have you Trump pawns been keeping up with what the select committee has been doing besides what you are told on Fox News?
 
Did you even read the article I linked to?

There was no fabrication of evidence. This is, as usual, a much ado about nothing from right-wing propagandists who are trying to get you and other Trump pawns to ignore what is being revealed. It was a distraction and you guys, as usual, ate it up.

The question remains, have you Trump pawns been keeping up with what the select committee has been doing besides what you are told on Fox News?
Yep. Read the article, and plenty of other news sources. Schiff is a crook. Like all the other leftists.
 
I am assuming you both are speaking about the text, and once again, you both prove my point. You have received misinformation from Fox News and other right-wing propagandists without attempting to actually research the issue yourself.

And considering you are a lawyer fascistinlouisiana, it is ridiculous to see you claim there was fabricated evidence, when that clearly was not the case. You should know better. But heck, you didn't even know what the law was in Louisiana, so I'm not really surprised.

There was no fabrication of evidence. Take a moment and actually read the truth instead of what Fox News tells you...

Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan Jan. 6 Evidence in Meadows Hearing?

"There is absolutely no validity to the complaints about the way this text was excerpted during the House debate on holding Meadows in contempt," argued Norm Eisen, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who was co-counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment of Donald Trump.

The fact that a period was inserted, possibly inadvertently, instead of an ellipsis on a graphic presentation is irrelevant. The use of a period versus an ellipsis doesn't change the meaning of the deeply troubling and false statement that the vice president should tamper with electoral votes," Eisen told Newsweek in an email.
"
Interesting that you claim those who disagree with you are victims of misinformation when it is you that is misinformed but that’s the leftist MO accuse others of what you are guilty of.

Sorry there 2 dogs but the Committee admitted their wrong doing but here you are spreading lies. Just like the leftist version of Trump’s “fine people” comment.

 
  • Like
Reactions: AC2020
Yep. Read the article, and plenty of other news sources. Schiff is a crook. Like all the other leftists.
And yet, you refuse to accept the facts contained in the article. And you then double down, calling Schiff a crook.🤣🤣

You are hopeless.
 
but the Committee admitted their wrong doing but here you are spreading lies.
I am not spreading lies at all. I gave you a link to an article that discusses the facts. You are the one that was misinformed, and is apparently choosing to remain so, even though the truth is right before your eyes.

The Committee admitted that a period was added inadvertently. Big deal! That isn't fabrication of evidence nor does it change what Jordan was up to with his texts.

You continue to be deceived and for some reason, you just allow it too keep happening. Do you enjoy being a pawn?
 
I am not spreading lies at all. I gave you a link to an article that discusses the facts. You are the one that was misinformed, and is apparently choosing to remain so, even though the truth is right before your eyes.

The Committee admitted that a period was added inadvertently. Big deal! That isn't fabrication of evidence nor does it change what Jordan was up to with his texts.

You continue to be deceived and for some reason, you just allow it too keep happening. Do you enjoy being a pawn?
A Marxist claims he's honest.

That's a new one.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT