Why would the DOJ oppose a "special Master" request?

[aix_xpert]

Question for the libs or the lawyers on the board? Why would the DOJ, who should be doing everything in their power to avoid looking political, oppose the judge putting a "Special Master" in place? If this wasn't a fishing expedition and they are truly investigating the crime of illegally possessing classified documents, then the special master just shows they are on the up-and-up. Their opposition to what is a clearly a very reasonable request regarding a highly political matter just adds to the stench of the whole affair.

DOJ opposes special master for documents seized from Trump, says more than 100 classified records found at Mar-a-Lago

Donald Trump wants a special master to examine documents seized from Mar-a-Lago in an FBI raid, which the DOJ says found scores of classified documents.

www.cnbc.com

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

I’m curious what privileges you think exist for a guy refusing to turn over SCI-level documents he conveniently kept alongside his framed Time magazine covers???


carry on

 

[aix_xpert]

I’m curious what privileges you think exist for a guy refusing to turn over SCI-level documents he conveniently kept alongside his framed Time magazine covers???


carry on

I'm not expecting privileges. But I also don't expect the government to attack its political opposition. That usually only happens in places where the elected leadership rules like dictators, i.e. Russia. I'm not questioning the government's position that they believe he committed a crime and need to investigate him. But why be against a "special master" if this isn't just a fishing expedition.

 

[davidallen]

I'm not expecting privileges. But I also don't expect the government to attack its political opposition. That usually only happens in places where the elected leadership rules like dictators, i.e. Russia. I'm not questioning the government's position that they believe he committed a crime and need to investigate him. But why be against a "special master" if this isn't just a fishing expedition.

A taint team was already established and has completed their work. Trump lawyers can oppose evidence they believe was improperly seized. At this point a Special Master is unneeded IMO.

 

[2012Bearcat]

I’m curious what privileges you think exist for a guy refusing to turn over SCI-level documents he conveniently kept alongside his framed Time magazine covers???


carry on

Oh I don't know, maybe attorney client privledge documents, Constitutional protections provided to everyone in this country including those that are the political enemies of Democrats. I assume you are familiar with the Constitution or at least of existence.

 

[Alpha Woke]

A taint team was already established and has completed their work. Trump lawyers can oppose evidence they believe was improperly seized. At this point a Special Master is unneeded IMO.

Which article did you read to form your opinion?

Link?

 

[2012Bearcat]

A taint team was already established and has completed their work. Trump lawyers can oppose evidence they believe was improperly seized. At this point a Special Master is unneeded IMO.

Are Trump and his attorneys allowed to have a different opinion?

 

[GoPokes43]

A taint team was already established and has completed their work. Trump lawyers can oppose evidence they believe was improperly seized. At this point a Special Master is unneeded IMO.

The ol' "just trust us" argument. Very convincing!

 

[davidallen]

Are Trump and his attorneys allowed to have a different opinion?

Certainly. They probably shouldn't have waited two weeks to express it.

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

Oh I don't know, maybe attorney client privledge documents, Constitutional protections provided to everyone in this country including those that are the political enemies of Democrats. I assume you are familiar with the Constitution or at least of existence.

What attorney-client privilege do you think exists concerning him not turning over SCI-level documents to the National Archives, as required by law???

You realize you’re just chasing your tail with this crap, yes?


Carry on

 

[davidallen]

Which article did you read to form your opinion?

Link?

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

 

[2012Bearcat]

What attorney-client privilege do you think exists concerning him not turning over SCI-level documents to the National Archives, as required by law???

You realize you’re just chasing your tail with this crap, yes?


Carry on

Do you have a functioning brain cell left that has not been infected with the dumb ass disease?

 

[Corndog2021]

Sean Hannity: FBI Personnel Are Demanding Chris Wray Step Down - At Least 20 Whistleblowers Have Stepped Forward (VIDEO)

Sean Hannity opened his show on Tuesday night by discussing the chaos at the thoroughly corrupt FBI. According to Sean’s sources, there are now at least 20 whistleblowers who have stepped forward to speak to Congress. The whistleblowers are demaning dirtbag Chris Wray step down as chief after...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

Do you have a functioning brain cell left that has not been infected with the dumb ass disease?

***confronted with facts and cogent rebuke of his hyperbolic rhetoric…..flails away with Trumpian defense mechanisms yet again***


Carry on

 

[davidallen]

Do you have a functioning brain cell left that has not been infected with the dumb ass disease?

Quite the fact filled, reasoned response you got there.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Sean Hannity: FBI Personnel Are Demanding Chris Wray Step Down - At Least 20 Whistleblowers Have Stepped Forward (VIDEO)

Sean Hannity opened his show on Tuesday night by discussing the chaos at the thoroughly corrupt FBI. According to Sean’s sources, there are now at least 20 whistleblowers who have stepped forward to speak to Congress. The whistleblowers are demaning dirtbag Chris Wray step down as chief after...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I saw where Garland sent out a threatening memo to the FBI reminding them they should not be talking to members of Congress. So much for whistleblower protections and celebrations.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Quite the fact filled, reasoned response you got there.

Yea when presented a stupid question I tend to give a stupid response.

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

Yea when presented a stupid question I tend to give a stupid response.

 

[davidallen]

Yea when presented a stupid question I tend to give a stupid response.

I'm sorry you can't defend an assertion of privilege by the FPOTUS in this case.

 

[Ponca Dan]

I'm sorry you can't defend an assertion of privilege by the FPOTUS in this case.

Bearcat doesn't need to defend it. Trump has lawyers that will do that.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Quite the fact filled, reasoned response you got there.

Facts are readily known to anyone paying attention to anything other than leftist's propaganda.

 

[aix_xpert]

What attorney-client privilege do you think exists concerning him not turning over SCI-level documents to the National Archives, as required by law???

You realize you’re just chasing your tail with this crap, yes?


Carry on

If the only documents taken by the FBI were the classified documents, your argument would make sense. But they took boxes and boxes of items, many of which do fall under attorney-client privilege.

 

[davidallen]

Facts are readily known to anyone paying attention to anything other than leftist's propaganda.

Apparently there are those who disagree.

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

If the only documents taken by the FBI were the classified documents, your argument would make sense. But they took boxes and boxes of items, many of which do fall under attorney-client privilege.

If only the documents taken by the FBI were kept in actual consideration of security and organized away from his ego-building self-portraits and the like as they are legally required to be - including the viewing of them in confined, secure rooms by authorized persons, such an argument would make sense.

But they had to take all those boxes and boxes because he doesn’t follow the law he just shoots from the hip and does as he pleases.



carry on

 

[davidallen]

Bearcat doesn't need to defend it. Trump has lawyers that will do that.

Uh huh. That's why we all post on this board. To wait for the attorneys to make our arguments for us. Yep.

 

[Alpha Woke]

Apparently there are those who disagree.

Hows their track record?

 

[iasooner2000]

(Melania’s undergarments especially)

 

[davidallen]

If the only documents taken by the FBI were the classified documents, your argument would make sense. But they took boxes and boxes of items, many of which do fall under attorney-client privilege.

What items would be admissable in court because a special master wasn't appointed? In other words how is Trump disadvantaged here? If he is in such peril from an over reaching prosecutorial apparatus why wait two weeks to make this request?

 

[davidallen]

Hows their track record?

Quite good actually. Do you only have ad hominem circumstantial arguments to make?

 

[ClintonDavidScott]

(Melania’s undergarments especially)

I guess she’s the first wife to have her undergarments searched through. That’s a completely unprecedented act of diligence by the Federal Bureau of Investigation…..



Carry on

 

[Corndog2021]

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/114/680/286/original/eeebfc9b0f636db3.webp

 

[Corndog2021]

Utah FBI employee arrested on suspicion of multiple counts of child sex abuse

STANSBURY PARK, Utah — A Utah man, who is also an employee of the FBI, has been arrested on suspicion of child sexual abuse. Robert Alexander Smith, 65,

ksltv.com

 

[Alpha Woke]

Quite good actually. Do you only have ad hominem circumstantial arguments to make?

It would help if you were truthful.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Apparently there are those who disagree.

The same ones that support the double standard juducial system and abuse of power? Yea tell me something I didn't know.

 

[davidallen]

It would help if you were truthful.

Do we need to list our the successful outcomes to get you to engage on this topic? Seems silly. Maybe somebody though would enjoy enumerating them though.

 

[davidallen]

The same ones that support the double standard juducial system and abuse of power? Yea tell me something I didn't know.

So no argument in support of the FPOTUS position then? You seemed really sure of yourself.

 

[Alpha Woke]

Do we need to list our the successful outcomes to get you to engage on this topic? Seems silly. Maybe somebody though would enjoy enumerating them though.

1) Russiagate

2) Impeachment II

3) you are here

 

[2012Bearcat]

So no argument in support of the FPOTUS position then? You seemed really sure of yourself.

I can't help you if you don't see the serious concerns about the fourth amendment, the double standards and the abuse of power.
If any of this were happening to one of your Democrat masters you would be raising hell and rightfully so but since it's a repulsive Republican you question nothing.

 

[2012Bearcat]

Do we need to list our the successful outcomes to get you to engage on this topic? Seems silly. Maybe somebody though would enjoy enumerating them though.

Sure, list all of those successful Democrat outcomes to get Trump. All you have is BS process crimes that everyone, on both sides, in Washington is guilty of.

 

[davidallen]

I can't help you if you don't see the serious concerns about the fourth amendment, the double standards and the abuse of power.
If any of this were happening to one of your Democrat masters you would be raising hell and rightfully so but since it's a repulsive Republican you question nothing.

Progress! In your opinion, what from the 4th Amendment applies here? Wasn't there a finding that there was reasonable cause for the search?