Why Ideology is the Ancient Enemy of Civilization
What ultimately destroyed the evil empires of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were bankrupt dogmas.
townhall.com
Victor David Hansen is spot on as usual.
Why Ideology is the Ancient Enemy of Civilization
- Thread starter 2012Bearcat
- Start date
townhall.com
Victor David Hansen is spot on as usual.
Then why are you so committed to your political ideology?Why Ideology is the Ancient Enemy of Civilization
What ultimately destroyed the evil empires of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were bankrupt dogmas.
Victor David Hansen is spot on as usual.
self defense. Only one side wants to transform America, drastically change energy policy, control the health decisions and livelihoods of their citizens and disrupt social norms. If the left all agreed to shut the Fvck up and support a simple and basic federal government we could all put down our guns and take our trucks home. But instead of transforming things locally in leftist strongholds you are wasting resources fighting federally with the right fringe.
I have no problem admitting I'm committed to a political ideology.
Are you honest enough to do the same?
You may think people on the right are committed to an ideology, but you would be wrong like you are on most everything else in life. All we really want is for the government to leave us alone, enforce all of our laws equally, provide for the common defense, secure our borders, quit spending our children's children into poverty, quit trying to divide the people, support the Constitution in the manner it was intended (meaning limiting the power of government while supporting and defending the rights of the individual) and a few other things. If that is an ideology to you, you have some issues.
Thank you for describing your political ideology from your perspective
You are a committed American right-wing ideologist. As usual, you decry that which you are.
Only if you think freedom is an ideology.
Spoken like the committed Putin puppet you are.
Brace yourself, Bearcat, the man who sees right-wing hobgoblins under every rock is about to school you in what is the definition of ideology. He’s busy reading the dictionary as we speak.
Here is one definition you definitely need to know and understand @Ponca Dan as you display this rather often, as other posters have noted too. A brief excerpt:
"If someone challenges you, for example, you might deny it by saying, “No, that’s not what I meant at all.”
"a tendency to pout, sulk, or give people the silent treatment when things don’t happen as you planned . . . frequent complaints about feeling unappreciated, misunderstood, or deceived."
How to Recognize (and Handle) Passive-Aggressive Behavior
Last edited:
Same reason I abandoned the toon and @ClintonDavidScott screennames. And all the other posters you've claimed I am. I got bored.
🤣🤣
Unlike you and your numerous screennames. Yep, projection is real with you too, just as it is with @OUSOONER67.🤣🤣
Are you actually going to try to deny you were @GL97 before toon_cents? Give us a straight answer. Don't be a chickenshit. The search feature will maybe help jog your memory.
Are you going to deny that you have numerous screennames you actually post and respond under? Give us a straight answer. Don't be chickenshit.
😎
I can definitely pout and sulk, but I almost never give anyone the silent treatment. But you’re wasting your time trying to
learn about passive aggressive behavior; you should do an intensive deep dive into multiple-personality disorder. Do your personalities talk among themselves, or are they unaware of each other?
You don't? Still giving @CowboyJD the silent treatment?
He recognized what you were about early on didn't he?
Notice what he says about how the continued obsession is getting a little creepy? Take note, again.
Go ahead, claim I'm @CowboyJD now!🤣🤣🤣
(btw, sorry to invoke you JD. You are welcome to attack me and note my faults to even this all out in your mind.👍)
Wouldn’t you love to see an ongoing conversation between @my_2cents and @_Insider_? One is so thoroughly an ideologue that spews divisive rhetoric with every word, sees right wing ideology as an existential threat to mankind and believes it and its adherents probably should be eliminated from existence, while the other claims to be a squishy moderate that deplores divisive language and worries for the future if it continues. The back and forth between the two personalities might throw the poor guy straight into schizophrenia.
Last edited:
Again, . . .
Are you going to deny that you have numerous screennames you actually post and respond under? Give us a straight answer. Don't be chickenshit.
Bet you will never honestly answer the questions.
Oh, I would never claim you are JD. In spite of our many differences I never doubted JD’s intelligence, while I question yours on a daily basis.
I don't believe adherants of right-wing ideology should be eliminated from existence. I'm not an authoritarian like you are Dan.
Stop projecting for once.
But what if I am? Oh, the possibilities!🤣
Hoping he will come to your defense now huh?🤣🤣🤣🤣 Maybe you will get lucky and he will, or attack me so you can feel better. We all know you are mad and upset right now. You desperately need more help than what you are receiving from the board's loon, aka @Medic007 and his other screennames.
Really though, you still giving him the silent treatment, what you claim you almost never do? Need more examples of this behavior from you on this board?🤣🤣
Do you actually think we have two "lawyers" with bullshit salvation selling degrees with 4 children on this board?
Exposing you as a liar yet again was that easy. You're not a lawyer. We both know that.
Are you going to deny that you have numerous screennames you actually post and respond under? Give us a straight answer. Don't be chickenshit.
Bet you will never honestly answer the questions.
Flail Meds, flail! You do you. Meanwhile . . .
Are you going to deny that you have numerous screennames you actually post and respond under? Give us a straight answer. Don't be chickenshit.
Bet you will never honestly answer the questions
In the tv series, Hanna, Erik teaches Hanna: “When they’re coming after you, run. If you can’t run, hide. If you can’t hide, attack.” Medic made an accusation against you from which you can neither run nor hide. So you ignore the accusation as if it never happened and go into a ridiculous attack mode, accusing Medic of doing what everybody knows you have done. I don’t think you understand how small and insignificant you make yourself look when you do that. You should man up and either confess or deny. Your refusal to do either makes it obvious you are guilty of that for which you have been accused.
I'll man up when he mans up. Meds is accusing me of doing that which he does. When he is honest, and tells us all the screennames that he currently uses to posts and respond to on this board (which we all know he does), I will be more than happy to be just as forthcoming about any other screennames I have used in the past.
Till then, it is just Meds playing his silly games and flailing about as he usually does on here. You really want honesty Dan, then demand it from everyone. In fact, do you have any other screennames that you use or have used?
So again, @Medic007 . . .
Are you going to deny that you have numerous screennames you actually post and respond under? Give us a straight answer. Don't be chickenshit.
I don’t know if Medic is playing a silly game, but it’s clear that you are. It’s amazing how often your behavior on this board mimics that of a 13 year old boy. Your reply to my comment is further proof that you have used (and in my opinion are now using) multiple names on this board. That you won’t deny it makes it clear Medic has the goods on you and you are terrified he’ll expose you for the fraud that you are.
Of course Meds is playing a silly game, that is all he does. You have acknowledged this rather often in the past when you two have butted heads. Check out the search function if you need some reminding.
I am not currently using multiple screennames on this board. I post under this screenname currently. If I ever change in the future for whatever reason, I'll let you know.
Now, since you all of a sudden want honesty on this issue, let's see if this extends to you as well. Do you have any other screennames that you use or have used? You nor Meds can't call someone a fraud for doing something you both won't give an honest answer to.
I do not have, and have never had another screen name on this board. To be perfectly honest I wouldn’t know how to do it if I wanted to. But why would I want to? I have no fear in expressing my opinions in all their passive aggressive glory.
