Why didn’t he choose Mexico or Haiti?
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
Take advantage of all that American exceptionalism has to offer and then run to a white country to pimp snobby beer.
what a tard and epitome of why i wait til redbox comes out with a movie before i watch
Same reason all the liberals said "I'm gonna move to Canada if Trump wins" and not Mexico. Doesn't make sense. Mexico is closer and has better weather. Its almost like they don't like brown people.
I wonder if the US, Australia, and Canada share another key characteristic that plays a big role in daily life?
Of course. Mistreatment of their natives. But whatever you are alluding to, we all know Damon would never take his family and riches to a majority Brown / Black Country.
Not to mention, the carbon footprint from traveling back and forth from Australia is ridiculously high.
Isn’t Matt Damon an environmentalist?
Why don't any liberals move to to Nigeria, Liberia or South Africa?
Man you guys are funny.
You scream about FAKE NEWS and then site the NY Post, the king of fake news. Page six is Enquirer bad.
Oh, and heres the truth:
https://www.boston.com/culture/cele...t-moving-to-australia-because-of-donald-trump
“Matt has visited Australia several times recently,” Allen wrote in an email, “but he has not bought a house there nor is he moving there.”
Do a little research folks.
You scream about FAKE NEWS and then site the NY Post, the king of fake news. Page six is Enquirer bad.
Oh, and heres the truth:
https://www.boston.com/culture/cele...t-moving-to-australia-because-of-donald-trump
“Matt has visited Australia several times recently,” Allen wrote in an email, “but he has not bought a house there nor is he moving there.”
Do a little research folks.
Almost as much as Trump has burned jetting to Mar-a-Lago 14 times since the inauguration.
“According to the publicist for Matt Damon.”
This Matt Damon....
One of Harvey’s pimps moving to the country isn’t exactly good PR for the Australian government, which already faces accusations of racism.
If you were choosing between the two countries, which would you choose?
Hint: You are much more likely to be the victim of a crime in one over the other.
Let’s be sure to let anyone move to our country from that one where you are much more likely to be the victim of a crime.
USA Today also reported it.
https://www.usatoday.com/videos/lif...-his-family-australia-because-trump/32964013/
I think that the immigrants/refugees from those countries are tacitly agreeing that the US is indeed a more desirable place to live.
Totally agree. If I was in their shoes, I'd do everything possible (including illegal immigration) to get to America.
Yes, why aren’t they moving to these diverse countries?
After all, the liberal mantra is “diversity is our strength.”
“Burning American flags” looks an awful like burning Trump campaign posters with Stars and Stripes on them. Hmmm...
So apparantly if you are American you are racist if you support ethno-nationism, but if you aren't then go right ahead and rub it in our faces?
Some of it....even if HOW he said it really doesn’t.
Which is why I hate his methods of communication. The validity of the message gets hampered by its expression.
I know the claim will be that I feel that way because of WHO is doing the communicating, but...at least for me...it’s not.
I agree on principle but not in this example. He called the countries S*holes, which is not an innacurate assessment. However, it was the anti-trumpers who extrapolated that statement to mean that he was talking about the people of and from those countries and thus another facet of his racist beliefs.
“According to the publicist for Matt Damon.”
This Matt Damon....
One of Harvey’s pimps moving to the country isn’t exactly good PR for the Australian government, which already faces accusations of racism.
NZ...you gotta know by now that there is a hugely effective response to your WeinsteinPicapaloozaWeinsteinPicapalooza every time you try this.
There is even the picture with Trump and That dirtbag.
Yet you keep banging away with the Weinstein pictures. I admire your persistence no matter how dumb I think it is to do it.
Calling the countries “shitholes” absolutely takes away from the validity of what I think he was trying to say IMO. This example falls in line with exactly the principle I stated, IMO.
He likes to provoke. When that is the basis of your communication, validity in the underlying message is almost always subject to greater scrutiny and doubt.
Am I correct in stating that these comments were made in private?
Which, if it were the case, doesn't seem quite as heinous.
It was made in an immigration policy meeting with House and Senate members.
Well, you might need to define what you mean by private. It was in a bipartisan group of legislators discussing immigration negotiations...which might arguably make it more egregious.
Similar threads
