ADVERTISEMENT

White tears

ScreamingFemaleBIGGER.jpg

I got your white tears right here...
 
What a pathetic way to crawl through life.....both the accused and accuser. "We're Dreaming of a White Dorchester," simply means that they want the town to be white WITH SNOW not all honkies. Someone needs to get off their bellies and tell the "offended" to FO and that if they don't have a grasp of literal meaning and or interpretation they should FO, if they don't understand the linkage to Bing Crosby's "White Christmas" they should FO and if they are so offended by such an innocuous play on words they should move to Canada and FO in the process.
 
What a pathetic way to crawl through life.....both the accused and accuser. "We're Dreaming of a White Dorchester," simply means that they want the town to be white WITH SNOW not all honkies. Someone needs to get off their bellies and tell the "offended" to FO and that if they don't have a grasp of literal meaning and or interpretation they should FO, if they don't understand the linkage to Bing Crosby's "White Christmas" they should FO and if they are so offended by such an innocuous play on words they should move to Canada and FO in the process.

The town is 45 percent black, but pretend to have read the story lol
 
Well, I'll be damned. More race.
You shouldn't be surprised about it. You lefties have made race a central component of your party platform and are always finding something stupid complain about. There's just way too much available fodder not to make fun of you dorks on the regular.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerRedYukon101
You shouldn't be surprised about it. You lefties have made race a central component of your party platform and are always finding something stupid complain about. There's just way too much available fodder not to make fun of you dorks on the regular.

That’s the part he refuses to understand. He either doesn’t follow his own people or is trying to paddle upstream and pin the blame on someone else. To think that I am obsessed with race when all I am doing is bringing articles written by his people is ridiculous.
 
That’s the part he refuses to understand. He either doesn’t follow his own people or is trying to paddle upstream and pin the blame on someone else. To think that I am obsessed with race when all I am doing is bringing articles written by his people is ridiculous.
It's his feeble attempt at deflection. He's been on this planet long enough to know how completely idiotic his political brethren have become but he's too afraid to speak up about it. He doesn't want one of those mean labels attached to him. Words hurt really bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerRedYukon101
That’s the part he refuses to understand. He either doesn’t follow his own people or is trying to paddle upstream and pin the blame on someone else. To think that I am obsessed with race when all I am doing is bringing articles written by his people is ridiculous.

Harry and Medic are right, Sys.

If you want to be taken authentically on the subject, you are forced to acknowledge the inordinate amount of focus on identity politics on the Left and the chaos that it causes not only your party but also the nation as a whole.

You and other non-hard left* are lazy in not critically evaluating what comes from your left flank.

*Culturally you are not hard left, policy you might be. The cultural hard left is ground zero for societal divisiveness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerRedYukon101
Harry and Medic are right, Sys.

If you want to be taken authentically on the subject, you are forced to acknowledge the inordinate amount of focus on identity politics on the Left and the chaos that it causes not only your party but also the nation as a whole.

You and other non-hard left* are lazy in not critically evaluating what comes from your left flank.

*Culturally you are not hard left, policy you might be. The cultural hard left is ground zero for societal divisiveness.

Ah. Let's have an intellectually honest discussion, Brad.

The problem Brad, is I see a guy that purports to love women, but also uses femininity as a slur. Cankles. Vaginasaurus. Menstruation jibes. That's strange. Why would someone that's not a mysogynist use such phrases to insult someone they don't like? Am I suppose to compartmentalize that disconnect and impute a white heart in other, similar issues?

Also, Brad, there's antother big problem and if you want a dialogue, I'd welcome it.

1. Can you tell me when and where conservatives have helped out the plight of blacks, and

2. Why blacks don't vote republican? Are they just too dumb to identify their true enemy?

3. Why do so many nationalists, D Duke types, mass killers, gravitate to Trump? Are they also just too dumb to identify their true enemy?

Thank you, Brad. I look forward to an intellectually honest and vigorous exchange about race.
 
Ah. Let's have an intellectually honest discussion, Brad.

The problem Brad, is I see a guy that purports to love women, but also uses femininity as a slur. Cankles. Vaginasaurus. Menstruation jibes. That's strange. Why would someone that's not a mysogynist use such phrases to insult someone they don't like? Am I suppose to compartmentalize that disconnect and impute a white heart in other, similar issues?

Also, Brad, there's antother big problem and if you want a dialogue, I'd welcome it.

1. Can you tell me when and where conservatives have helped out the plight of blacks, and

2. Why blacks don't vote republican? Are they just too dumb to identify their true enemy?

3. Why do so many nationalists, D Duke types, mass killers, gravitate to Trump? Are they also just too dumb to identify their true enemy?

Thank you, Brad. I look forward to an intellectually honest and vigorous exchange about race.

Are you 5? GTFO here with your narrative driving, framing questions.

When I see that you're not a liar, and that you genuinely do want an intellectually honest conversation, you'll have more than one take on this board.

Until then, I refer you to my "A few observations" thread.

Me, waiting on the non-lying Sys to show up:

tenor.gif
 
Are you 5? GTFO here with your narrative driving, framing questions.

When I see that you're not a liar, and that you genuinely do want an intellectually honest conversation, you'll have more than one take on this board.

Until then, I refer you to my "A few observations" thread.

Me, waiting on the non-lying Sys to show up:

tenor.gif


You get enraged anytime takes you off the right wing airwave-driven talking points. Those are fair questions. You wanna talk about race, let's talk about race. The conversation won't go like a one sided Rush or Hannity convo though.

Or at least bring some dank memes to the table.

And why can't you be more entertaining like Wharry? It's so, so, goshdarned boring to ask some obvious questions and just draw deflection and refusal to engage. Every time.
 
You get enraged anytime takes you off the right wing airwave-driven talking points. Those are fair questions. You wanna talk about race, let's talk about race. The conversation won't go like a one sided Rush or Hannity convo though.

Or at least bring some dank memes to the table.

And why can't you be more entertaining like Wharry? It's so, so, goshdarned boring to ask some obvious questions and just draw deflection and refusal to engage. Every time.

I do engage, but I don't engage you in the game you play. They aren't "fair" questions, because you narrow the context of the conversation to fit your desired ends. A conversation "about race" is just what you want, but it's far from sufficient.

Unsurprisingly, you want to go just deep enough to have an issue upon which to rail (most likely reinforcing for yourself that your political team is "good")....but not deep enough to perform adequate root cause analysis which may yield avenues for progress.

Yeah, I think your type of thinking is lazy, toxic, and the worst.

I'd ask you to reach deep down and find your inner Quant, but you won't. You're old and entrenched. Your type of thinking will never go away, but it will be better informed in the future. Hold-overs like you are legacy dead weight.
 
I do engage, but I don't engage you in the game you play. They aren't "fair" questions, because you narrow the context of the conversation to fit your desired ends. A conversation "about race" is just what you want, but it's far from sufficient.

Unsurprisingly, you want to go just deep enough to have an issue upon which to rail (most likely reinforcing for yourself that your political team is "good")....but not deep enough to perform adequate root cause analysis which may yield avenues for progress.

Yeah, I think your type of thinking is lazy, toxic, and the worst.

I'd ask you to reach deep down and find your inner Quant, but you won't. You're old and entrenched. Your type of thinking will never go away, but it will be better informed in the future. Hold-overs like you are legacy dead weight.

Alrighty. I engage you every couple of years to the safe effect. Those are fair questions. You're a caricature of a narrative-fed conservative that can't operate outside of right wing messaging. Those are fair and obvious questions, they're just never addressed on the incel circuit.
 
Alrighty. I engage you every couple of years to the safe effect. Those are fair questions. You're a caricature of a narrative-fed conservative that can't operate outside of right wing messaging. Those are fair and obvious questions, they're just never addressed on the incel circuit.

Legacy dead weight doesn't acknowledge that reasonable explanations have been provided (and refreshers are easily findable).

You are guilty of not digging deep enough.

Your type of thinking most likely isn't motivated by malicious inner racism, but the effect is the same: problems aren't solved (or worse, they are exacerbated).
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT