What is funny....

[OKSTATE1]

Dems have weaponized BK against them. He will never forget this. He will have a 100% conservative voting record. Payback will be a MF’er. You politicize the process gonna get it back in your face 100x.

It would take Jesus himself to forgive the Dems for this total shit show.

He is gonna rape the Dems, LOL

 

[SMemmett]

Brett “The Grudge Judge” Kavanaugh.

 

[poke2001]

Brett “The Grudge Judge” Kavanaugh.

Whatever works.

 

[Been Jammin]

He is gonna rape the Dems, LOL

Probably not the best choice of words in this case.

 

[CowboyPhil]

Or the perfect words?

 

[OKSTATE1]

Brett “The Grudge Judge” Kavanaugh.

Dems will have created him. How you treat people matters.

Harry Reid open pandora’s box with nuke option. This is part 2 of a Karma train on Dem butt holes.

Going to be funny as hell to watch for several decades.

 

[HighStickHarry]

Probably not the best choice of words in this case.

He didn’t say fake made up rape so it doesn’t really apply here.

 

[Been Jammin]

Dems have weaponized BK against them. He will never forget this. He will have a 100% conservative voting record. Payback will be a MF’er. You politicize the process gonna get it back in your face 100x.

It would take Jesus himself to forgive the Dems for this total shit show.

He is gonna rape the Dems, LOL

Just curious. If you are correct (and I agree with you) is an extremely partisan individual the best option for the SCOTUS in your opinion? Or, does it not matter, because the Dems are reaping what they sewed?

 

[OKSTATE1]

Just curious. If you are correct (and I agree with you) is an extremely partisan individual the best option for the SCOTUS in your opinion? Or, does it not matter, because the Dems are reaping what they sewed?

Washington is what it is, Dems will do anything to win. Dems created this problem, not me. I hate Washington, he will be confirmed. How he votes from the bench might exhibit the same way the Dems vote.

Hell, he may not. But frankly it will be FUNNY to see political payback and he tears the Dems rectum. Harry Reid. Dems started it, now this. Going to play dirty fine, stupid to create an enemy for potentioally 30 years when things could been handled right.

My opinion does not mean shit other then to know like Harry Reid, Dems may really regret this.

 

[Been Jammin]

Washington is what it is, Dems will do anything to win. Dems created this problem, not me. I hate Washington, he will be confirmed. How he votes from the bench may be exhibit the same way the Dems vote.

Hell, he may not. But frankly it will be FUNNY to see political payback and he tears the Dems rectum. Harry Reid. Dems started it, now this. Going to play dirty fine, stupid to create an enemy for potentioally 30 years when it things could been handled right.

My opinion does not mean shit other then to know like Harry Reid, Dems may really regret this.

You don't think the GOP started this with M. Garland? Or, is it OK for them to play the game, but not the Dems?

 

[CowboyPhil]

Reid changed the rules in 2013 well before Garland

 

[Pokeabear]

Reid changed the rules in 2013 well before Garland

McConnel threatens to change the rules in 2004 unless the Dems acquiesced. They did. It was going to happen.

 

[Ostatedchi]

McConnel threatens to change the rules in 2004 unless the Dems acquiesced. They did. It was going to happen.

It was bound to happen when the 17th Amendment was ratified.

 

[Pokeabear]

It was bound to happen when the 17th Amendment was ratified.

Arguable. State assembly appointed Senators had its advantages in the early days of our Republic. Times change as do Constitutional mechanisms.

 

[Ostatedchi]

Arguable. State assembly appointed Senators had its advantages in the early days of our Republic. Times change as do Constitutional mechanisms.

The 17th Amendment turned the Senate into a glorified House of Representatives. It was bound to happen.

 

[blbronco]

Dems have weaponized BK against them. He will never forget this. He will have a 100% conservative voting record. Payback will be a MF’er. You politicize the process gonna get it back in your face 100x.

It would take Jesus himself to forgive the Dems for this total shit show.

He is gonna rape the Dems, LOL

And if that is the case, he is as bad as the Dems are trying to make him out to be.

 

[OKSTATE1]

And if that is the case, he is as bad as the Dems are trying to make him out to be.

Nope, equals and they deserve him.

 

[blbronco]

Nope, equals and they deserve him.

So, and I get this is hypothetical, you are fine with a supreme court judge ruling by revenge/emotion rather than the constitution?

 

[OKSTATE1]

So, and I get this is hypothetical, you are fine with a supreme court judge ruling by revenge/emotion rather than the constitution?

No, I did not say that. I am saying it will be funny as shit if the Dems weaponized him against them. Dems created the circus, perhaps they poked and tortured the lion a few times too many and whoopsy daisy the lion is out of the cage and is hungry for a meal.

Obviously, with the responses I am seeing, some Dems now see this as a real possibility.
Whoopsy daisy, Throw the boomerang sometimes it comes back and gets you.

Might as well enjoy Washington for the entertainment value.

At best this a great troll, at its worst BK rips Dems rectum for decades. I never believed BK would overturn abortion, but I kinda hope he does now just for the wailing and entertainent value, I think he should since evidently this is all what the Dem hysteria is about.

 

[Been Jammin]

So, and I get this is hypothetical, you are fine with a supreme court judge ruling by revenge/emotion rather than the constitution?

Clearly he is fine with that. Because it will be entertaining to him. SMH. #Sad

 

[N. Pappagiorgio]

So, and I get this is hypothetical, you are fine with a supreme court judge ruling by revenge/emotion rather than the constitution?

You talking about Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

 

[blbronco]

You talking about Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

I can say that about any supreme court justice or hopeful. Have I been at all unclear about this?

 

[xplor58]

I don't think it will change the way he sees things. He is a strict constitutionalist and like his history shows will do the job of a supreme Court judge and interpret the Constitution.

Now since the Dems want someone that will make up new laws that will be enough to send them over the edge every time. And that is funny enough!!!!!