They don't even try to appear intellectually honest any more. The consensus was clear after the dust settled, one hour before the debate. Lemmings don't care, either.
What a stupid, predictable constituency...
- Thread starter anon_xl72qcu5isp39
- Start date
"...when they post it." Hopefully there's at least a pretense of waiting until the debate occurs before bragging about winning it. And wouldn't you know.. Pence is losing. Huh.
No excuse for what they did there. But you want to talk about Lemmings?
"Donald Trump called all Mexicans rapists" - Nope, not at all what was said.
"Donald Trump said everyone should have nukes" - Nope, not even close
"Donald Trump says a judge can't make a ruling just because he's Mexican" - Yeah, could never had been any potential bias in the ruling.
"Trump is a fascist who admirers Putin, Kim Jon Un, Sadam Hussein, and Quadafi."
Need to start a business for both sides.
No excuse for what they did there. But you want to talk about Lemmings?
"Donald Trump called all Mexicans rapists" - Nope, not at all what was said.
"Donald Trump said everyone should have nukes" - Nope, not even close
"Donald Trump says a judge can't make a ruling just because he's Mexican" - Yeah, could never had been any potential bias in the ruling.
"Trump is a fascist who admirers Putin, Kim Jon Un, Sadam Hussein, and Quadafi."
Need to start a business for both sides.
You cannot win this argument with facts.
I know. It's always the same no matter what board I run across. They just don't deal well with cognitive dissonance, it's uncomfortable.
No excuse for what they did there. But you want to talk about Lemmings?
"Donald Trump called all Mexicans rapists" - Nope, not at all what was said.
"Donald Trump said everyone should have nukes" - Nope, not even close
"Donald Trump says a judge can't make a ruling just because he's Mexican" - Yeah, could never had been any potential bias in the ruling.
"Trump is a fascist who admirers Putin, Kim Jon Un, Sadam Hussein, and Quadafi."
Need to start a business for both sides.
Well, he did kind of express that stuff. Those aren't whole cloth fabrications, like making up a debate review before the debate!
So, you're saying whole cloth fabrications like I did not have classified email on that server, I don't know of any weapon sales to terrorists in Libya, and Benghazi was caused by a terrible internet video?
1. The Bush administration deleted MILLIONS of emails -- nobody cared. This is why I decline to give a shit about the emails and server. Since when does that matter to conservatives? Talk about false equivalence.
2. I'm sure we are doing all kinds of deals in the middle east. We should, and we should NOT be getting americans killed. Again, it's an impossible situation over there and any attempts to surreptitiously guide events without getting americans killed is statecraft imo.
3. Benghazi is just silly at this point. Again, why does someone care about that compared to Iraq? Her malfeasance is several thousand times worse with Iraq, imo, vs. anything she did with Benghazi.
Whatever happens, conservatives will bitch, cry wolf, and contend it's some type of existential crisis. Yawn. Ya'll need to be more selective about the hysterical scandals becaue the general public doesn't even bother to listen any more. The conservatives lie so damn much I tune them out. It's a shame, because the country actually needs a credible conservative voice.
No, they were taken out of context to create alarmism and scare people. Also, was it Trump that made up a debate review before the debate or the RNC? The GOP is dying a glorious death.
A quick skim indicates nothing but the usual liberal talking points excusing their Queen's behavior. Yawn.
Illegal mexicans! Thugs and rapists! Muslims! Isis! You can't walk outside without getting shot!
Yes, please accuse another candidate of alarmism and scaring people. When your guy says it, it's facts. When the other side uses Trumps own words its alarmism.
His own words, sure. But with many contextual words missing.
Also, good to see you finally admit it's stupid to think you are going to randomly get shot.
Words taken out of context to insight fear. Yeah, I can damned sure say it.
You're actually more concerned about what one candidate has said than what the other candidate has actually done. You're clearly well principled. /sarcasm
