In light of today’s excellent GDP figure, which we were repeatedly told would “never” happen — it’s time for a poll.
In light of today’s excellent GDP figure, which we were repeatedly told would “never” happen — it’s time for a poll.
Trump has not yet achieved this, however, this number gives him a strong opportunity to do so.
Who said that?This is not accurate. Noone stated that Trump (or any president) couldn't achieve 3% or even 4% growth in a quarter. It was stated that the US economy could never grow at an annual 3% rate again. Trump has not yet achieved this, however, this number gives him a strong opportunity to do so.
Who said that?
There were a number of articles at the time on CNBC (one of the sites I follow religiously). I just googled and here's several:
http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-3percent-20170519-story.html
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...onomists-are-skeptical-us-can-grow-3-percent/
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/ec...realistic-economic-growth-say-experts-n763666
This was a common theme during the budget review because his 3% growth projected in his budget was so unobtainable. So there are a number of articles across the media spectrum espousing the inability of the US economy sustaining 3%. Surprised you don't remember these.
All of those concede that GDP growth can exceed 3% just not for a sustained period like the 90s. I disagree with them, but they haven't been proven wrong yet.There were a number of articles at the time on CNBC (one of the sites I follow religiously). I just googled and here's several:
http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-3percent-20170519-story.html
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...onomists-are-skeptical-us-can-grow-3-percent/
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/ec...realistic-economic-growth-say-experts-n763666
This was a common theme during the budget review because his 3% growth projected in his budget was so unobtainable. So there are a number of articles across the media spectrum espousing the inability of the US economy sustaining 3%. Surprised you don't remember these.
Agreed. My post explicitly states that.All of those concede that GDP growth can exceed 3% just not for a sustained period like the 90s. I disagree with them, but they haven't been proven wrong yet.
No it says annual rate of 3% and Trump has a strong chance.Agreed. My post explicitly states that.
You left off that electing Trump would create an immediate recession and stock market plunge. These were statements made by individuals that prior to the election I would have considered as apolitical in their perspectives but clearly showed otherwise.
No it says annual rate of 3% and Trump has a strong chance.
It also says and I quote: "Trump has not yet achieved this".