ADVERTISEMENT

We finally used the MOAB

This was used in Vietnam to clear landing areas in jungles aka Daisy Cutter. Target was a Taliban training complex with massive tunnel system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaPoke
This was used in Vietnam to clear landing areas in jungles aka Daisy Cutter. Target was a Taliban training complex with massive tunnel system.

pretty sure this is different, the MOAB was first tested in 2003, it has never been dropped since.

Form the fox news article...

The MOAB -- Massive Ordnance Air Blast -- is also known as the “Mother Of All bombs.” It was first tested in 2003, but hadn't been used in combat before Thursday.
 
Biff love Boom-Boom. Biff make big Boom-Boom after warn Russia first! Biff can't take out aiport with 59 missiles. Syria keep flying after Boom-Boom. Biff eat chocolate cake and talk more shit. Biff is cuck. ISIS supposed to over in February.

Maybe he should've launched another 41 missiles? 59 wasn't enough, maybe 100 missiles would've put the airport out of commission for a day?
 
Biff love Boom-Boom. Biff make big Boom-Boom after warn Russia first! Biff can't take out aiport with 59 missiles. Syria keep flying after Boom-Boom. Biff eat chocolate cake and talk more shit. Biff is cuck. ISIS supposed to over in February.

Maybe he should've launched another 41 missiles? 59 wasn't enough, maybe 100 missiles would've put the airport out of commission for a day?

graspingatstraws.jpg
 
Biff love Boom-Boom. Biff make big Boom-Boom after warn Russia first! Biff can't take out aiport with 59 missiles. Syria keep flying after Boom-Boom. Biff eat chocolate cake and talk more shit. Biff is cuck. ISIS supposed to over in February.

Maybe he should've launched another 41 missiles? 59 wasn't enough, maybe 100 missiles would've put the airport out of commission for a day?
Nice to have a 6 year old chime in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007

You're right, Head. He should've probably used 200. Maybe he could keep them from using the airport if he launched 200 missiles.
 
Honestly, could someone please explain how 59 missiles doesn't destroy an airport? 59? Has there ever been a target hit with 59 missiles?
 
Honestly, could someone please explain how 59 missiles doesn't destroy an airport? 59? Has there ever been a target hit with 59 missiles?
They blew up the infrastructure and munitions you moron. A cruise strike to a runway can be repaired in a day.

It's a waste of millions of dollars to hit the runways. That's an Obama move.

You have gone full retard lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
Honestly, could someone please explain how 59 missiles doesn't destroy an airport? 59? Has there ever been a target hit with 59 missiles?
They also destroyed 29 aircraft that's a significant hit to Assad's air force.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
They blew up the infrastructure and munitions you moron. A cruise strike to a runway can be repaired in a day.

It's a waste of millions of dollars to hit the runways. That's an Obama move.

You have gone full retard lately.

Okie Dokie. Wouldn't know that the infrastructure and munitions were destroyed from the looks of the airplane that took off and dropped bombs later that same day.

Edit: Wow -- "Moron" and "retard" in the same post. You're not usually a big name caller. Let me ask you: Please provide me a piece of evidence that could more conclusively establish that bombing as ineffective other than Assad using that airport afterwards in the same day to bomb the same place. As usual, it was all optics for Biff. Make lots of press and explosions and don't accomplish shit. We could've housed Melania in NYC for a long weekend for what those 59 missiles cost.
 
Last edited:
Okie Dokie. Wouldn't know that the infrastructure and munitions were destroyed from the looks of the airplane that took off and dropped bombs later that same day.

Edit: Wow -- "Moron" and "retard" in the same post. You're not usually a big name caller. Let me ask you: Please provide me a piece of evidence that could more conclusively establish that bombing as ineffective other than Assad using that airport afterwards in the same day to bomb the same place. As usual, it was all optics for Biff. Make lots of press and explosions and don't accomplish shit. We could've housed Melania in NYC for a long weekend for what those 59 missiles cost.
Sorry about the name calling but you have been more obtuse than usual and it's annoying as hell. (I know that's the point, but still.)

Syria used the runways, the hangers and other facilities are mostly trashed and it is my understanding they destroyed the chemicals being stored there. The chemicals have to be mixed before they are used that is why it was safe to bomb them without endangering civilians.

I doubt they destroyed every plane or they may of brought some over from another another airfield.

Besides trashing a military air base the message was sent, attack civilians and you'll get punched in the nose. How much you want to bet they don't use chemical weapons again. If they do it will be because Assad is at the end of his rope.

I know the game plan is to attack Trump for every single thing he ever does, good or bad, but you need to pace yourself. At this rate you'll double your natural aging process.
 
Honestly, could someone please explain how 59 missiles doesn't destroy an airport? 59? Has there ever been a target hit with 59 missiles?
I will answer once you answer my question and quit stalling...... I have a nice Malbec blend on ice so it should be ready in a few I have a little time.
 
Honestly, could someone please explain how 59 missiles doesn't destroy an airport? 59? Has there ever been a target hit with 59 missiles?
It obviously did more than a deal with Assad to remove ALL of his chemical weapons did. How'd that Obama brilliance pan out? No attacks with chemical weapons since then, huh? Geaux Obama!
 
The Daisy Cutter imprimis referred to earlier was "only" a 15,000 lb. bomb, but was also C-130 delivered:

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT