My God — read this article from excellent leftist journalist Glenn Greenwald about Stefan Halper.
Key info for our board’s leftists:
Key info for our board’s leftists:
We’re living in a Tom Clancy novel
- Thread starter NZ Poke
- Start date
again they didn’t think he’d win
intersting to see this backtracking thru the bush
intersting to see this backtracking thru the bush
Remember the stuff Perot was saying about being followed by black choppers.
The stuff that killed his campaign.
The stuff that killed his campaign.
The 2016 election was planned as Bush vs Clinton (Jeb vs Hillary) - either was going to be acceptable.
Trump (and his pesky voters) derailed the whole thing.
Bernie (and his pesky voters) could have derailed it too, but the DNC and it’s corporate media operatives took him down.
The media is in full CYA mode given their extreme one-sided reporting.
Very confused... so your saying the NYTimes is good, Reagan was bad. You guys can't keep your story straight. I suppose that is a good sign.
What the Times article highlights is that the people trying to drive the narrative know their audience is really really stupid and have zero recall.
The same people that were telling you Trump was crazy for saying he was spied on are now saying "Sure we spied on him."
And that washes with libs.
All the Reagen crap does for me and most others is confirm this system needs a reset.
I'm going to give Greenwald some credit he is a lefty but at least he can see there is something seriously wrong with what the FBI and DOJ have been claiming.
The Post and NYT wanted him outed so that when people figured out who the Inspector General is talking about in his report the narrative can be spun to make it seem appropriate or discredit the spy/informant.
The Post and NYT wanted him outed so that when people figured out who the Inspector General is talking about in his report the narrative can be spun to make it seem appropriate or discredit the spy/informant.
It was a compromise to unite the party.
The establishment was firmly behind the Bushes. Reagan not so much.
Yeah, but I would rather not be president than be assassinated.
Then again, my balls are merely mortal flesh.
Speaking of assassinations, Brennan is dropping some interesting tweets.
http://fbnewscycle.com/obamas-cia-c...t-promises-to-expose-his-treason-lock-him-up/
You would have a very good point if Cicero was a Emperor of Rome assassinated by the Praetorian Guard of a former Emperor.
Instead, Cicero was a Senator proscribed by Imperial edict for criticizing a member of the ruling Triumvirate.
It's "constitution"
What a dastardly move, to claim the mantle of defender of the constitution.
All the while pissing on the very document he claims to defend.
Communists are almost all alike.
thanjs for the constitutional correction
in the belly of a trojan horse
a dastardly claim indeed
What document pissing have we established?
So far we have established that he likes to quote Cicero a defender of the republic and non assassination victim. How does that jibe with the incoherent article about assassination threats?
Pretty unbelievable that the director of the FBI would be in an official photograph shaking hands with a special agent.
Also is Asha Rangappa good now that we have discovered that she shook hands with the guy who is using this whole Trump investigation as a smoke screen to investigate Hillary/Obama?
There's a lot that's been established re: Brennan so far.
If he has been a party to unlawfully spying on an opposition party candidate for POTUS, you have no problem with that?
Pretty telling that a Tucker video and a website that couldn't be bothered to Google Cicero are the sources you are trotting out.
Keep the band playing. It's good for morale.
